Hi, Diane –
I retired about 10 years ago, at the age of 55. I’d had that number in my head as a dream retirement age for about 10 years, but didn’t really think I’d be able to – but all of a sudden circumstances changed at work that made it more feasible. Retiring at 55 meant that I got a little under half of the amount I’d get if I’d waited until I was 62, but I decided I could live on that since we are pretty frugal. I don’t regret it for an instant. As it is, I think the last few years of working (at a desk) took a toll on my body, but I can’t imagine if I’d stayed longer.
In making my decision I sat down and figured out how much I’d have retiring then vs waiting a few years, and the payoff didn’t seem enough to make it worth waiting. I was lucky enough to have my home paid off already, though, which helped immensely.
If you can sit down and figure out how much you will need to live on, and if you will have the resources somehow to meet those requirements, I’d say go for it. I’ve always been on the conservative side with regard to financial risk, but if you have the ability to live frugally that helps a lot. I think you can find a way to make your dream of hiking work physically – I’m betting on your body healing. I do understand the worry about “losing your dream”; my knee was pretty messed up for about a year, but it eventually has gotten back to being pretty functional. If you say it’s “okay” but hurting, I’m assuming they told you nothing is seriously damaged? Time and physical therapy are your best friends there.
If you can’t afford to fully retire yet, can you work part time? That can make life much more enjoyable until you are able to retire completely.
I hope that you are able to find a path to retiring at the right time for you. It’s understandable that an accident can make many things feel shaken (or shaky), physically and emotionally; as others have said, if you need help (counselling) to work through that, don’t hesitate to seek it out.
Debbie

