Topic

basic daypack question

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Sebastian O BPL Member
PostedMay 8, 2017 at 3:01 pm

Hello,

I was recently on a basecamping trip during which I was allowed to borrow a Kelty RedTail daypack. Nothing fancy, pretty old school:

Well it turned out to be quite good since it was so hefty/think my back didnt really feel the load (layers, camera, water).  Maybe it was this that did the trick?
<ul class=”product-item-details” data-ui=”product-information-detail-features”>
<li class=”description-text”>Constructed from rugged 600-denier ripstop polyester and reinforced with 610-denier Cordura® polyester to withstand the rigors of the trail
<li class=”description-text”>Lightweight, flexible, high-density polyethylene framesheet helps keep loads from sagging and sharp gear from poking you in the back

https://www.rei.com/product/780622/kelty-redtail-1800-pack

When I got home I loaded all the same stuff on my new but returnable REI day pack and the load felt heavier and kinda collapsed on my back. Obviously its a thinner, lighter, more packable day pack.

https://www.rei.com/product/880836/rei-co-op-trail-25-pack-mens

In a backpacking trip, the Kelty would be better for day hikes but take up a lot more space in my main pack while the REI much less and weigh less.

So, Im curious about your opinions on this comparison and what you think bottom line matters most?

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

David Thomas BPL Member
PostedMay 8, 2017 at 3:49 pm

OTOneH, I think every pound counts, even in a daypack with a total weight of 5 pounds.

OTEPOTH: It only starts to limit my mileage after 35 miles, so I could chalk up any “extra” weight as better training / conditioning.

So, if you’re happy with it as a daypack, use it.  HYOH.  But on a backpacking trip, when you are only using it to take a side trip, peak bag and maybe as an organizer stuff sack and/or bear bag, it’s extra weight for every single mile, including the ones when it’s stuffed in your main pack.

So I’d get a 2.6 to 3.2-ounce sil-nylon minimalist daypack for that packs down to the size of a lemon and use that for all those tasks.  Sea-to-Summit has one for $30-ish, available anywhere.  Some options on eBay are around $10, but always a bit of crap shoot. Then on a side trip, I use my sleeping pad or some clothing to add padding.

But that’s me who is not a photographer.  I know those lenses and camera bodies are really pointy against your back.  If you use a CCF pad under your bag, you could potentially cut it to fit an otherwise unpadded daypack and attach velcro so you can reassemble it for sleeping use.  Or cut a custom daypack pad / sit pad that might also be part of your sleep sleep under your head or hips.

Also, anything you can do to make the lenses less loose in the day pack will help a lot.  A piece of 3-ply 1/8″ plywood with velcro straps to secure each lens and body in a particular spot?  That could be pretty light.  Or similarly but with a double-layer of those corrugated political campaign and “Lose 40 pounds in 30 days” signs you see on power poles.

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedMay 9, 2017 at 6:25 am

I have to ask, What main pack are you carrying that justifies also carrying a day pack that weighs more than a 62-liter Arc Haul???

Definitely go with David’s suggestion and do some mods with that S2S ultra sil day pack so that stuff doesn’t poke your back.

Or forgo the day pack idea altogether and get a good UL pack with side compression cords or straps that snug everything down for side trips without full kit. I do this with my Arc Haul in the winter.

PostedMay 16, 2017 at 7:54 am

Hey S

you could try a Ribz type front pack. Just got one and have yet to put it through the paces, but initially liking it.

Rod

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Loading...