“All have been conservatively rated”
I disagree with this.
It really depends on the type of pad – regardless of company.
Don’t forget, it wasn’t all that long ago that sleeping pads weren’t even “rated” at all!
While the X-therm pads tend to receive favorable ratings and reviews for cold weather use, the X-Lite pads gets numerous complaints about being “too cold”. Based on what I understand, T-rest’s testing methodology for establishing R-value most likely distorts the results for air mattresses, compared with ccf pads or insulated mattresses. This is my personal speculation based on what I know about their testing, and their lack of accounting for distortion caused by varying amounts of force applied to different parts of the pad.
In other words, their testing uses flat metal plates which evenly distribute force across the entire pad, thus creating consistent and uniform thickness in the pad. While this might make it easier for them to calculate an R value, this system does not compensate for the huge pad thickness differential created when a person actually sleeps on a pad. The heaviest parts of us compress the pad 2-3x more than the lightest parts of us. Because of all this compression (like under our hips, knees, and shoulders if we are a side-sleeper), we have significantly reduced the R value between us and the ground, based on T-Rest’s “measured value”. Conversely, the thickest parts of the pad are are now parts of the pad we aren’t even touching. Side sleepers beware: the listed R-values are NOT accurate, imho.
(Roger Caffin wrote a great piece on sleeping pads, back in 2011. Perhaps it’s due for an update, but the fundamentals are still the same. While they’ve been talking about it for years, the industry still hasn’t changed their ways.)
Â