Good catch Dave. I saw that leatherman as well but then forgot to mention it. Agree the ONLY thing I’ve ever actually used was a small pair of travel sewing kit scissors.
I wonder sometimes what posters expect when they ask questions about their gear lists. Are they asking route specific questions? Which I tried to answer…. and based on general 4-corners experience as well as specific Salt Creek experience; or do they really want to review the process of lightening up?
You have to be pretty much relentless on the lightening up process, while knowing where to draw the line at personal safety.
The more I do it the more I think the biggest thing you need to leave at home and out of the pack is fear.
Dave did the report say where they were camped? The canyon is tightest at SC4. You have the opportunity to get a boatload of experience up there in Alaska right? Is there much discussion about planning routes and campsites based on avoiding likely bear corridors?
In Salt you might not be exactly right in the way of a rambling bear at SC1 , SC2 and SC3; but any bear coming along is going right by or more or less through SC4. Relatively close contact is unavoidable and even the tightest cooking/scent practices are not going to create a situation that misses a bear’s notice; though who knows what exactly prompts a response where a tendency towards avoidance is overcome by , well desire.
There are tight cultural-artifact constraints on campsite locations in Salt Creek. There is also the need to locate campsites where water is reliably available. But if there’s a bear going up or down canyon past that SC4 vicinity/meridian whatever, and really anywhere between Peekaboo and the Upper Jump; Mike Kelsey jokes aside, it’s basically coming through your campsite. And there’s no alternative except maybe putting the campsite location in a side canyon like the one a little further downstream leading to Angel Arch, which may also have cultural-artifact constraints and you’d have to walk out to the main stem for water. I’d guess this is the core of what has the Needles District focused on preventing a bear problem.; for the sake of the bear(s). I just wish they’d decide what is necessary.
I also don’t really understand why they couldn’t install boxes at each site; but then again that seems like a pretty practical solution at pretty much every established/official site nation-wide. How much could it possibly cost? enough $ for (insert your favorite moderately priced, questionably necessary federal expenditure) maybe? I mean if you really want to solve the problem.