Topic
Anyone repair their BRS 3000 ?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Anyone repair their BRS 3000 ?
- This topic has 34 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 6 days, 23 hours ago by
Dan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Feb 3, 2025 at 8:30 am #3827715
if you buy orings, they normally come in a package with many
you use one, after a time it degrades and you have to replace
what about that package with the rest of the orings, will they also be degraded, or is there a way to store them so they don’t degrade?
(I have a package of orings for msr fuel bottles. I used one. The package is degrading right now.)
Feb 3, 2025 at 10:18 am #3827726I hate to needlessly encourage more waste production than necessary. I don’t think it’s a huge safety issue, if you follow a safety protocol. Clear the area and smell for gas. Sometimes we let our guard down. Test your stove beforehand. Chances are you’ll only miss a cup of coffee. The stove and fuel become useless dead weight in your pack
Depending on the how long and what conditions the extra o rings were stored. I’d carefully examine them. Then test the stove after.
Feb 3, 2025 at 10:39 am #3827727I want to see if a higher quality-Viton-o ring will help with my gas leakage on the BRS. They don’t have tons of miles but leak while putting on the can more than any stove and when cold way too much for my liking.
Feb 3, 2025 at 1:14 pm #3827739I dare say very cheap crappy O-rings may degrade over time, but I have never heard of either Viton or Nitrile degrading. Bear in mind these two are industrial grades and are expected to last under very severe conditions for years on end.
And I have been buying and using O-rings for decades.
Cheers
Feb 3, 2025 at 1:36 pm #3827740The o-rings on the Challenger shuttle were viton, IIRC. Not criticizing the material, BTW. And I understand that the unexpectedly cold weather was a problem. I was skiing in Vermont that day, and it was brutally cold.
Feb 3, 2025 at 3:33 pm #3827755The cause of the disaster was the failure of the primary and secondary O-ring seals in a joint in the right Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB). The record-low temperatures on the morning of the launch had stiffened the rubber O-rings, reducing their ability to seal the joints. Shortly after liftoff, the seals were breached, and hot pressurized gas from within the SRB leaked through the joint and burned through the aft attachment strut connecting it to the external propellant tank (ET), then into the tank itself.
WikipediaWe do not know exactly how cold the Viton O-rings had become, but they were ‘very cold’. Viton is designed for high temperatures, NOT for use in the cold. Say -20 C to+205 C long term, +250 C short duration.
Personally, I think relying on two huge-diameter O-rings to seal against the temperature range and pressure expected in the booster was ethically unwise, maybe even criminally so.I recollect from the time that the chief engineer tried to stop the launch for this reason, but the relevant mgr told him to take off his engineering hat and put on his management hat. ‘We have to launch today.’
You see what happens when pollies and bureaucrats ignore STEM staff? Death.My 2c
CheersFeb 3, 2025 at 4:04 pm #3827759“The air temperature was forecast to drop to 18 °F (−8 °C) overnight before rising to 22 °F (−6 °C) at 6:00 a.m. and 26 °F (−3 °C) at the scheduled launch time of 9:38 a.m.”
so, not that cold
but, that case is so different than camping stoves that it probably isn’t very useful. Larger orings, larger diameter, more force, you could have racking – more force one one side than the other, hot gases,…
the orings on my msr fuel bottles had cracks in them so I replaced. I bought the bottle in 1972? probably 30 years later I noticed them being cracked. But I never noticed fuel leaking out. No space shuttle explosions or anything
Feb 3, 2025 at 4:47 pm #3827764Personally, I think relying on two huge-diameter O-rings to seal against the temperature range and pressure expected in the booster was ethically unwise, maybe even criminally so.
The overall system failed, so clearly there were design flaws in this particular case, but huge viton o-rings are still used for this application, so I think this is an over-reaching generalization made by someone who is probably not an aerospace engineer. It’s easy to mock engineers and managers retroactively, but the people who designed the space shuttle were not stupid.
Feb 3, 2025 at 5:11 pm #3827769but the people who designed the space shuttle were not stupid.
Oh, for sure, I agree.
But it still blew up.Cheers
Feb 3, 2025 at 7:32 pm #3827774But it still blew up.
Yes it did. And may their memories be a blessing to their families.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.