Topic

A thru-hike of the Dixon/Wilson Southern Sierra High Route (6/27-7/3/2016)

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
PostedJul 19, 2016 at 10:31 am

Earlier this month a friend and I completed a thru-hike of the Dixon/Wilson Southern Sierra High Route (SoSHR) (http://www.adventurealan.com/southern-sierra-high-route-soshr-guide/).

We made a youtube recapping the amazing trip here:

Youtube video

 

Since I’ve just left home for grad school in NY, having grown up with the Sierras, I felt it was really important to have one last incredible trip in the Sierras. We thru-hiked Roper’s classic Sierra High Route last year (https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/106650/) and after much thought, we decided there couldn’t be a better follow-up to that unsurpassable level of high route immersion in the range of light than the SoSHR.

We set a challenging pace for ourselves last year on the SHR (12.5 days) so we decided to take a more leisurely pace this year on the SoSHR (6.5 days). Due to heavy snow in the Palisades and an altitude setback, we couldn’t complete Mt. Sill. This was a huge disappointment to me, since I’ve been dying to complete it since I passed it on the SHR last year. We made up for it a bit with a short side trip up to the east ridge of Mt. Russell at the end of the trip. We’ll just have to come back for another trip to the Palisades and do Sill.

 

The concept behind the SoSHR is awesome: finish the highest and finest 100 miles of crest stretching from the northernmost 14ers, in the Palisades, to the southernmost 14er, Mt. Langley, that the SHR neglects, while staying true to the spirit and vision of Roper’s original concept. Plus I’m a huge fan of Alan Dixon. He puts forth incredibly high quality route ideas and info all things backpacking, and he’s super kind as well.

I’ve posted a full day-by-day trip report with photos here: https://austinlillywhite.wordpress.com/trip-reports/247-2/

 

Jacob D BPL Member
PostedJul 19, 2016 at 11:21 am

Superb trip, Austin! Art forwarded me the link to your blog, which I read thru before stopping by here. Good stuff and great photos as well. Congrats and thanks for posting.

PostedJul 19, 2016 at 12:30 pm

What a great way to bid farewell(until next time) to the Range of Light. Thank you for sharing a sublime experience.

Art … BPL Member
PostedJul 19, 2016 at 1:33 pm

thanks for the inspiring trip report.

some more great beta for us, before we head out on the route next week.

your side trip up Russell makes me want to do that also, but not sure we will have time. can you offer more on that bit ?

PostedJul 20, 2016 at 11:03 am

@ Jacob D & @ Tom Kirchner — thanks so much for the kind and encouraging words!

@ Art re: Mt Russell — unfortunately I don’t have a whole lot to offer on Mt Russell. The main reason I decided to pull the plug on getting all the way to the true summit is b/c we hadn’t done any reading at all on it and had no idea about safe routes, potential problems etc. We got to the top of the Russell-Carillon Col, saw that Dixon writes something along the lines of “short and thrilling class 3 climb”, and since that was a mellow day for us, decided to go up as far as we could.

Our experience was: by the time you reach the Russell-Carillon Col, it is (relatively) a short climb the summit of Russell, and you’ve already knocked out most of the elevation. Probably would take an hour to get to the peak. The climbing and scrambling is easy, easier even than the climbing we had to do on Whitney, and is a total blast. We scrambled up to what the eastern ridge that leads up from the Russell-Carillon Col. After about half hour / 40 min we got up that and saw that you then have to contour around or something like that and then ascend a second more western ridge that then leads up to the true summit. However, at this point, while the climbing is still not technically any harder than the Col or than Whitney, the exposure just gets insanely ugly, way worse than anything on the Mountaineer’s Route or the Col. With the poor grip we were feeling on our trail runners and with the total lack of preparation or study for the ascent, we decided it was best to pull the plug.

I would say with adequate reading on the summitpost page for the peak, if you feel mentally prepared for it, and have good sticky shoes, you stand a great chance of finishing it up. Even if you only get out a little bit up the first ridge, you get unsurpassed views forward over your route the next day up the Mountaineer’s gully, the notch and the final 400, as well as backward over Lake Tulainyo.

Here’s an image of us on the way back down from the first (easternmost) ridge after we had turned back. The westernmost ridge (true summit) is not in view. However, the route to the top of the first easternmost ridge lies just above Elijah’s head, on the left frame of the photo. The angled slabs gives you an idea of of the gnarly exposure. Sheer drop off on the other side that is not in view. There is little if any protection from this point.

Art … BPL Member
PostedJul 20, 2016 at 11:15 am

thanks for the Russell beta Austin. 2 of us on our trip are climbers, and one is not. we may skip Russell and call it due to time constraints since the Acrodectes variation will probably put us a half day behind.

Ben C BPL Member
PostedJul 20, 2016 at 11:21 am

Really nice report.  We did a lot of this trip last summer and it really took me back.

PostedAug 7, 2016 at 11:13 am

@ Art — hope your trip goes/went well! Can’t wait to hear about how the Acrodectes-Baxter variations went.

 

@ Ben C — thanks for the kind words! Glad to hear it brought good memories :)

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Loading...