Oct 10, 2007 at 2:34 pm #1225395
@kclaytonLocale: Greater Yellowstone
What is the difference between the Delorme mapping software for the entire US and the National Geographic Topo for individual states?Oct 10, 2007 at 11:53 pm #1405145
National Geographic Topo utilizes a collection of USGS maps at various scales that are seamed together for the state you purchase. So the NGP maps look exactly like the USGS maps that you might find at an outdoor store (contours, colors, place names, etc.). I believe that they use 500K, 100K, and 24K(QUAD) series maps depending on zoom level. The software appears overly simplistic in nature, particularly for print functions (the mapping kiosk version is better but probably not available for purchase). All maps in NGT appear to be raster data (i.e. scanned image files). I believe each state will cost you $100 retail.
Delorme Topo USA utilizes vector data to generate it's own contours, roads, and other features for any zoom level. The software automatically turns on increasing levels of detail as you zoom in (much like GIS software can). The maps will NOT look exactly like the USGS maps from outdoor stores. However, Delorme is getting very close to emulating the USGS maps in terms of symbology, color palette, labeling, etc. The software with vector data for the entire US will cost you $100 retail.
Delorme also sells a product called Delorme TopoQuads. This software uses seamed 24K USGS scanned images that are rastered by the program just like the National Geographic software (except with no 500K or 100K maps). The TopoQuads software is standalone, OR you can take the raster data and run it within the Delorme Topo USA application. Delorme TopoQuads are sold by the state (except for a few states that are sold by the half like MT, OR, and CA) at $100 retail per state (or half).
Neither application is perfect on road and trail information. As everyone knows, USGS maps are updated fairly infrequently (maybe every 10 to 20 years?), so they are perpetually out of date on roads and trails that are built, closed, restricted, obliterated/rehabed, or renumbered/renamed. This affects the reliability of maps from National Geographic and Delorme TopoQuads. Delorme Topo USA gets road and trail information from a third party service. The updates are more frequent, but it suffers from its own reliability issues – primarily roads and trails on the maps that no longer exist. I find myself double checking new areas on Google Earth or with land management maps (USFS, BLM, State, etc) before I go into new areas because I have had too many surprises when I trusted what appeared on the software.
I personally run Delorme Topo USA 6.0 with embedded Delorme TopoQuads for Idaho. This setup is a $200 retail value, but has proven the most reliable for my needs. And Delorme Topo USA has a particularly reliable GPS interface for upload/download and real time tracking on a laptop.
I recommend the DVD versions of any of these softwares that you would select, since the data usually fits on one DVD disk. The CD versions require multiple disks which quickly get annoying.Oct 11, 2007 at 10:11 am #1405183
I like using Delorme Topo USA. With Delorme Topo USA you can turn on the quad grid to identify quads. Then it is easy to obtain free, online copies of the USGS quads armed with the reference number.
In all my cases, I've found that the coordinates relating to the intersections of major roads and primary trails are pretty close. You can enter the location into Google Maps or other online mapping to double check. Use caution for forest service roads and rural roads – sometimes these are adequate, but other times they are pure crap based on my experience.
Obviously, trail relocations are not going to get software updates as quickly as road construction updates. It is better to check with the appropriate agency or association if you need the latest trail information.Nov 3, 2007 at 4:15 pm #1407708
I have used both, I definately prefer the Delorme.Nov 3, 2007 at 7:05 pm #1407723
@mad777Locale: South Florida
I prefer the Delorme Topo. I'm on version 6.0 now and I started on 2.0 long ago. Works well with both my Garmin GPS units (eTrex Summit and Map 60CSx).
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.