Topic

Interesting bear can policy for Big Bend National Park

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 5:37 am

I'm planning a nice Outer Mountain Loop trip in Big Bend in a few weeks, and there is a "compendium" online that says bear cans will now be required. It is NO WHERE ELSE on the website at all…and frankly, if I hadn't noticed a thread on it in the Big Bend forums I would never have known about that at all.

But the policy is an odd choice, since there are something like 3 bears in the whole park and there have been no known instances of bear-hiker problems. Granted, I actually kind of like the idea of NOT waiting until your park is like Yosemite before figuring out how to deal with it, but the whole thing has been odd. The wording of the compendium also is odd…so I emailed Big Bend. Here is our exchange:

On Dec 30, 2014, at 10:56 AM, arnberger, claudia wrote:

Good morning:
There are 4 options for food storage as follows:
1) Attend the food by staying in close proximity and within immediate reach per the compendium. This means within a few feet of the food.

2) Keep food inside a hard sided vehicle

3) A bear proof/animal proof box where provided

4) A bear proof canister from the list at this website: http://www.sierrawild.gov

I think this answers your questions.
Please contact me again if I can be of further assistance.

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Jennifer Mitol wrote:
So to me, this suggests that instead of a bear can I am allowed to just store my food bag in the vestibule of my tent, or even as a pillow (which I have done in the past in various places)
Correct????

Date: December 30, 2014 at 11:01:25 AM CST
Subject: Re: From NPS.gov: bear canisters for OML?
From: "arnberger, claudia"
To: Jennifer Mitol

Yes, you are correct. As long as you are "in close proximity and within immediate reach" of your food.



So you need a bear can, unless you don't. My guess this is for food caches or base camping only; it is common for people to leave water caches around Big Bend because the water shortage, and perhaps they leave food there as well? I also know people drive up on back roads (dual sport motorcycle riding is VERY popular there) so there may be an issue with them?

Anyway, I thought this was an interesting bear can policy.

Alex H BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 6:22 am

Jennifer you are interpreting their strange answer/policy correctly. As one of the folks who has been in the discussions, both on Big Bend Chat and with the park, it is still confusing and maddening that it is not in print or electronic any where but only in the hard to find superintendents compendium.

Their main concern is food left unattended, either longer term caches or for base campers during the day. Evidently they feel the few bears are not so aggressive that they will actually come into camp when humans are there.

The more pain in the ass part of the policy is that if you are caching food and water, the water also has to be in a bear can. This means multiple bear cans are needed.

For those interested here is the thread on BBC that discusses the new policy in detail

http://www.bigbendchat.com/portal/forum/national-park-news/new-food-and-water-storagecaching-rules/

PostedDec 31, 2014 at 6:28 am

Alex, do you know if you can just leave water caches in the bear lockers? I planned on leaving water in the lockers at the Dodson trailhead (my brother rides dual sport and drops water there for me…it's AWESOME!)

I assumed that you can…

M B BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 7:06 am

considering lack of trees to hang from, or tie an ursack too, what they have written are the only sensible possibilities. the only other thing is to leave food unnattended.

Alex H BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 7:12 am

"do you know if you can just leave water caches in the bear lockers?"

Yes all the same old rules apply to the lockers at both Homer Wilson and Juniper canyon trailheads, just label with your name and date of pick up.

Paul Wagner BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 7:19 am

I couldn't help but think that this policy is important. When you only have three bears, you don't want to have to destroy one because stupid people have fed it too often!

Charles Grier BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 8:05 am

Alex, do you know whether they still have the steel storage lockers at the campsites in the high Chisos? When I was last there in 2007, I believe, there were storage lockers at most of the designated campsites around the high Chisos loop trail. Are they still there? I'm planning a trip there in late February, don't plan on caching food or water, and don't want to carry a bear can. I plan nights at Ventana Meadows and somewhere around Boot Canyon.

John S. BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 8:40 am

Big Bend is not enforcing the bear canister for 2015. They plan to enforce it for the future but do not have set up a canister rental structure yet.

Alex H BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 8:45 am

Charles- yes still the same lockers in all the Chisos backcountry sites so no need for a bear can.

Paul- you are correct about minimizing the habituation of bears. Jennifer was exaggerating with 3 bears. The population seems to fluctuate between 20 and 30. If you go and read that thread at Big Bend Chat I posted above, there is discussion about trying to keep them wild and not having to fix it after the fact like Yellowstone or Yosemite. I think most of the posters there begrudgingly agree that keeping food from bears is good. It is the requirement for long term cached water to be in a bear can that makes less sense. But the argument can be made for both bears learning to associate water jugs with food and that if you lose water that you were counting on being there then there is a safety issue too.

M B BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 8:52 am

Bears need water, just like food, even moreso. In a very dry environment i can see them starting to associate humans with that as well if they have access to it.

Alex H BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 8:54 am

"Big Bend is not enforcing the bear canister for 2015. They plan to enforce it for the future but do not have set up a canister rental structure yet."

That is not really clear. There have already been threats of tickets and at least one person was told they thought it would start this month but the official statements from permit issuers has been all over the place. They may start a rental program but you may have to have your own to start. It has been unofficial policy for several years that cached food had to be in a canister (with tickets issued).

I would check with the park before going as it is changing quickly and if nothing else adhere to the closely attended rule and the caching rules. The bookstore has been told it would be good to stock some bear cans for folks to buy but I would bring or rent my own to make sure.

John S. BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2014 at 9:01 am

Alex is right. I misspoke what the chief ranger has said last August. At that time it was none needed for remainder of 2014 and wait and see for 2015. Best to ask them outright before trip as you have done.

PostedJan 1, 2015 at 7:11 am

And my email exchange was a specific reply to bear canister requirements for my trip January 14. She was not at all ambiguous about needing to store food properly for that trip.

And yes, I WAS exaggerating about the three bears. sorry……..

But as someone who has been to Big Bend a few times now, and who is truly amazed at the wildness of it – i think it's a great idea in such a barren place to PREVENT bears from ever associating people and caches with easy-to-get food.

PostedJan 1, 2015 at 8:51 am

“Though the park biologist believes that the resident population of bears in the Chisos Mountains remains somewhat steady over time, estimating its current number, based on sightings and cameras, to be approximately twenty [June, 2013], he is wary of becoming complacent about the bears who live in the park, given that the “small, suitable habitat of the Chisos is very susceptible to climatic changes. This is going to be a dynamic population. We’re probably mid-way in a rollercoaster ride right now, and it could go either way. Them being here is good: our goal is to keep them here.” “

An interesting article.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Loading...