Topic
Less trees, more water for California?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › On the Web › Less trees, more water for California?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Oct 14, 2014 at 3:13 pm #1321778
Californians, will someone be thinning your forests pretty soon so you can water your lawns?
Oct 14, 2014 at 3:54 pm #2141573…
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:05 pm #2141580and idea floated by the timer industry, no doubt…
b
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:12 pm #2141582an idea floated by the arsonists association?
maybe the lawyer of an arsonist?
maybe just science – that trees take up water and evaporate it without thinking about the political considerations? Of course, if there's water evaporated, where will it go and will there be more rain Eastward?
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:24 pm #2141587The math that needs to be done here is quite complicated, really. Sure there is water lost, but shaded ground loses less water than exposed terrain and many conifers "catch" the fog with their upper needles and make it drip to the ground. They do mention water run off at least. So many factors to consider and that is if we only think of water and nothing else. Worth looking at but some people will make up their mind one way or the other in less time than it takes to read that bit..
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:29 pm #2141589Actually the math is quite simple:
1 Sierra Club based in CA + 10 million environmentalists = 0 tree cutting to save water
Billy
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:36 pm #2141592…
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:41 pm #2141596…
Oct 14, 2014 at 4:41 pm #2141597Good article on who ( politicians) sold your water to what special interests in California during this drought.
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:06 pm #2141632There sure is a lot of water flowing out the Columbia River.
They should make a pipe going down to California.
Columbia River = 265,000 ft3/second = 8E12 ft3/year
CA water use = 80 million acre ft per year = 2.6E12 ft3/year
Columbia has about 3 times as much water flowing as California uses on an annual basis
If you could send 10% of Columbia water to California it would make a big difference.
Might be easier to ship 30% of people and agriculture in CA to Oregon/Washington
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:15 pm #2141637How can we possibly need water when we have the Great Lakes to drain for LA's drinking water. Pipeline. Get busy.
Timber industry is somewhat alive here still.
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm #2141645Meanwhile my neighbor waters her lawns, by hand, for at least an hour a day, every day of the week. I believe her lawn is actually a parasitic organism similar to Ophiocordyceps unilateralis that has somehow gotten its spores into her brain and has taken control of her mind and body.
It seems there's no end to the shenanigans we'll propose to increase the supply side of the equation, only to put it to completely idiotic and wasteful ends.
Oct 14, 2014 at 6:46 pm #2141647AnonymousInactiveWhat's all our water doing in Canada's lakes?!
Oct 14, 2014 at 7:17 pm #2141658"Might be easier to ship 30% of people and agriculture in CA to Oregon/Washington"
Shut your mouth!
Oct 14, 2014 at 7:18 pm #2141659Had to look up "Ophiocordyceps unilateralis"
My phobia is that humans will go extinct because of a fungus.
Maybe the genetic engineers will create a fungus to produce energy or something, but will also have the unintended property of converting human tissue to an energy source.
Oct 14, 2014 at 7:20 pm #2141660"Shut your mouth!"
okay, but the alternative is to ship 10% of the Columbia to California
I think that would be better
we'de make a bunch off the deal
Oct 14, 2014 at 7:21 pm #2141661Or they could slow their overpopulating.
Oct 14, 2014 at 9:03 pm #2141693Well the good news is that California has done such a great job with its natural resources that we have guys like Yvon Chouinard campaigning to breach our dams on the Snake and Columbia River you know, cause he knows about stuff like this.
BAM! That just happened!
Flame war in 3… 2…
Oct 14, 2014 at 9:17 pm #2141700"Or they could slow their overpopulating."
Single child law? After one, is mandatory abortion and sterilization?
Oct 14, 2014 at 9:18 pm #2141702Take away the financial incentives and welfare state that subsidizes numerous kids.
Oct 14, 2014 at 9:26 pm #2141705I know, welfare mothers have 16 kids so they get enough welfare so they can drive Cadilacs : )
Next you're going to say that global warming scientists claim that the globe is warming just so they can get grants for studies
This is a chaff thread isn't it?
Oct 14, 2014 at 10:30 pm #2141716"Might be easier to ship 30% of people and agriculture in CA to Oregon/Washington"
That's been done over the last 30 years, I thought.
Oct 14, 2014 at 11:02 pm #2141722"There sure is a lot of water flowing out the Columbia River.
They should make a pipe going down to California."
There's a whole book about how certain parties wanted to make that happen.
Oct 15, 2014 at 6:41 am #2141757Someone has their work cut out for them.
Oct 15, 2014 at 8:23 am #2141787Then when you get into the southern sierra's that doesn't have many trees and what do you get?
You get the worst smog in the country from Bakersfield to Visalia.
Go figure.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.