Hey, i'm comparing the two recently. I'm going to upgrade from the NEX6.
Though i'm not heavily invested in the NEX E mount system the a6000 would be a familiar upgrade.
but i kind of want to try out the OM-D EM10 or EM5 or EM1.
I like being able to do some time lapse stuff w/o having to buy the applications.
Has anyone owned both? can comment on them? i've read up and down the internet about the two and they seem similarly matched, each having advantages and disadvantages.
Here are things I like about the a6000 that I have experienced with the NEX-6
I like the flash. Its flexible and I bounce flash quite a bit indoors (all the time)
I like the image quality,
the compactness of the system.
I wish it had a touch screen for the af like the OMD.
the OM-D does not have a flexible flash
does have a touch screen
has a huge array of lenses (compared to the apsc amount lenses)
Also has in body image stabilization. which would help with my 200mm minolta legacy lens
One has a bigger sensor which ultimately will capture more light in low light situations, etc.
I'm just turned around and confused.
Love the NEX-6, I know i would love the a6000, but is the grass greener on the other side? or does it appear that way?
