Torso vs. full length pad

I use a torso length pad for three season backpacking but it's a Prolite. I've never found that my feet get cold and I rarely put anything under them other than a ground sheet. I have on occasion just slept on the ground without a pad and it hasn't bothered me thermoregulation-wise so take it fwiw ymmv etc.

My only concern with using a thicker pad like yours is the drop off from the hips to the knees and ankles. I've read many complaints here where that's been uncomfortable for some people.

That "drop" is why I've hesitated to cut down my L-sized XLite. Considering that the pad tapers to the feet, you would be cutting off less width per inch of length, so the weight savings isn't quite as much as it would seem by chopping 30% of the length. My estimate is you might save about 3 oz.

Do you carry a sitpad? That combined with your pack under your legs could give you adequate insulation and reduce the "drop" further.

I've been considering the exact same thing, but then just realized the weight savings on a torso length large X-Lite wouldn't be worth it after considering the drop off and loss of comfort since I'm a stomach sleeper. I imagine the top of my feet would get stretched on the ground or on my pack…but I digress, since this isn't about my situation. I only mention that to say why I'm not going through with trimming down my large XLite.

Nothing else that I can find seems lighter than a large (un-cut) XLite that also offers the same level of comfort.

Have you thought about CCF to save weight? I have a strong feeling that I can't do it since I sleep on my stomach. If I slept on my back, I bet some creative campsite selection would make CCF bearable.

No, I haven't considered CCF, and I value my comfort too much to do so. I see what you guys are saying about the "drop" off an air pad from the torso to the legs. Hmm…maybe stuffing your pack with something to raise it?

As far as cutting down the Xlite goes, if the LARGE is 78", I could still cut off a significant amount and have enough room, since I'm only 5'7" tall. If I could save 3+ oz I would say it's worth it for me, since I've gone to great lengths to cut off fractions of an oz elsewhere. The main reason to cut down an Xlite would be to make a standard length Xlite with a wide shoulder–which I wish ThermaRest would make to begin with. I just don't understand how people bigger than me can be comfortable on a 19"-20" wide pad, esp. with the NeoAir baffle design.

Now someone just needs to invent an inflatable PACK! It could serve as a multi-use item:

1. a flotation device for crossing deep and swiftly moving rivers
2. to go underneath your legs, allowing you to carry a torso-length pad
3. to give the impression that your pack is full so that you can pass gear off to your hiking companions
4. ?

You may want to look at the small Prolite (regular). I find that it's pretty comfortable on anything but concrete and it'll save you the 3oz.

"My thought was this: Have a torso-length pad (or cut down an Xlite) for the summertime when you want to go UL / SUL, and then have a full-length Xtherm for fall/spring/winter when temps drop below 32 F."

I went exactly this route. I have a short xlite for warmer weather and a full length xtherm for cooler weather. My motivation wasn't to cut weight in the summer as much as why put wear and tear on a very expensive pad when it's not needed. The other benefits of the xlite in the summer is that it is faster to blow up than the full length pad, a task I abhor.

You could argue that I have excess gear but I hike enough that I will likely replace both pads before my hiking career ends. It is certainly not the cheapest approach but likely the lowest long term cost.

del

David, you've said:

>>"I was wondering what a LARGE Xlite would weigh at around 50-55" in length (cut down)."

>>"The main reason to cut down an Xlite would be to make a standard length Xlite with a wide shoulder"

Which are you looking to end up with, 50-55" torso length or standard length (which would be 72")? My estimate of saving 3oz was based on trimming to 50-55", you won't save nearly that much trimming to 72" (reducing length by only 5"), my estimate on that would be less than 1oz saved, IMO not worth voiding the warranty.

"My thought was this: Have a torso-length pad (or cut down an Xlite) for the summertime when you want to go UL / SUL, and then have a full-length Xtherm for fall/spring/winter when temps drop below 32 F."
Nothing wrong with that. I use a Klymit Inertia X-Lite Recon for the hottest weeks, and have gone to a Prolite Small for most of summer, spring and fall. Exped Downmat UL 7 for winter, though.
I used a Thermarest Guidelite 3/4 with my feet on my pack year round for a long time, and used to take an extra pair of heavy socks in winter because my feet would be the only thing that got cold(would even wrap them in a fleece vest sometimes). Hasn't happened since I started using full length insulated inflatables.

. –Now someone just needs to invent an inflatable PACK! It could serve as a multi-use item:–

David,

MLD offers that as an option as an inflatable back pad for your pack.

Also, Gossamer Gear sells a torso pad that is tapered in 2 directions, less drop off for your legs.

Either of those might work for you.

I use a large X-Therm in the winter, and a reg X-Lite in the summer.

Like others I've moved the other way – for the comfort/sleep factor – the over-arching thing being better sleep.

Used a TAR short for a few seasons (incl. some quite long trails – CT).

Using a pack under feet is OK – but the big pain for me was making a pillow high enough…as the pillow was off the mat.

With a full-length mat those problems go away at a 60g (oz and a half? penalty); come on – there's no contest…

I'm happier, wriggle less, sleep way better, don't need to muck about with arranging poor mat/pillow alternates that 'creep' in the night and make me restless.

Best thing I've chosen to do in years regarding weigh/benefit.

Torso pads plus backpack has worked for me just fine all winter out here in the Northeast, but my pack has a built-in foam back that is pretty substantial (it's a Boreas Buttermilk). I find that my legs and feet don't rest as firmly on a pad as my torso does, on account for things like heels and knees, so I lose a lot less heat in my lower body. I wouldn't hesitate to use a torso/pack system at any temperature above -20ºF.

I used it last night, in fact. Slept like a baby.

I am 5'7" and only my feet stick off. It is 11 oz but you don't get any extra width. I would like to have a wider pad for the same reason you mentioned but I find that this pad works well.

I tried the torso pad and found it very uncomfortable to the point where my next day was effected by lower back pains from having that 'drop' of legs off the edge off the torso pad. Please have a good go at it before you do decide to go down the torso road. In my case I knew after the first night and NEVER had any luck with it thereafter.

Full length all the way. Life is too short for a crappy night t's rest in the outdoors. I used a 3/4 neo ex lite for years. The full sized pad, though, there is no comparison.

Not mentioned is that a shorter pad (wether "3/4" or torsosize) with your legs and feet on a pack, may allow your legs and feet to lie higher (depending on the pack of course) and recuperate during the night. Having been doing that for ever and sleep good.

After my feet being the coldest part of my body on my pack, no matter what bag I was using, I decided to ditch the torso length pad for a full length pad. Feet are warmer. I was also tired of having to empty my pack to use under my feet. Now I have storage in my pack for odds and ends right next to my head.

Steve

same here – tried torso length, full length warmer and more comfortable feet.

It's narrower at foot end so doesn't add that much weight.

But torso length works too

so actually, one should add the "3/4" pad (actually 2/3) to complete the comparison. Being able to choose only between torso and full length, my choice would be the full length either. But if a "3/4" would also be one of the possible choices, it would make a choice more difficult since, at least for me, I always slep5 nice and I was never cold (not even my feet)on such a pad.

I think there are two keys to using a non-full-length pad:

1. Use other items to insulate/cushion your lower legs and feet (ex: pack or sit pad)

2. Camp on softer or more insulated ground (ex: sleep on pine needles or dead leaves vs packed dirt)

The second is not always possible, but the first should be.

I've been trying out a small XTherm and I think it's fine. I'm 5'6" and I put my sit pad under my feet at night (inside my quilt) and this works for me. I think a 3/4 length pad works well with a sit pad as long as you're not sleeping on snow. If I expect to be sleeping on snow, then I bring a full length pad.

:-) I have been sleeping on snow with a 3/4 pad and I had no issue at all.

I've been using a 3/4 length pad mostly because that's the most pad that I can carry that takes up the least amount of space. I use a z-rest. Sometimes if my feet/lower legs are a little cold, my trash compactor bag flattened out under my feet adds enough extra warmth. You'd think it wouldn't make any difference but oddly it does.