I'm trying to understand the warmth difference between a Polartec Alpha hoody and a Patagonia R1 hoody. Presumably one has to wear a windshirt in breezy conditions for both, so what is the justification for Alpha. It appears R1 is somewhat lighter than let's say the Westcomb Tango, and they are both relatively compressible. Does the Alpha hoody provide significantly more warmth than the R1 and thus can satisfy both demands of an active mid-layer and also an in camp sedentary insulation piece. If the latter, then I can see using the alpha in both applications and not taking my usual R1 and Rab Zenon combo (fall/winter). That would save 10 oz. and some room in the pack. Am I interpreting the Alpha niche correctly?
Topic
Warmth of Polartec Alpha vs. Patagonia R1
Become a member to post in the forums.
- This topic is empty.
I think a simpler and more valid comparison would be
a. Westcomb Tango (14 oz)
vs.
b. Patagonia R1 Hoody (12.6 oz) with Westcomb Crest (5 oz)
I've read here that Polartec Alpha is available in four weights: 60, 80, 100 and 120gm/m2. I suspect that the Westcomb Tango is constructed with 60 or 80 m/m2, but I can't find any specs for it on web.
I suspect that option a would be approximately twice as warm as combination b. Switching the fleece in b to one constructed of Polartec Thermal Pro High Loft fleece would reduce the warmth difference considerably, possibly entirely.
Are there any minimalist hoodies constructed of Polartec Thermal Pro High Loft?
"I've read here that Polartec Alpha is available in 4 weights: 60, 80, 100 and 120gm/m2"
80 and 100 is sure, 60 and 120 not untill someone can show things made from it.
"I suspect that the Westcomb Tango is constructed with 60 or 80 m/m2, but I can't find any specs for it on web."
80
del
Become a member to post in the forums.

