Topic

On the best uses for a Mchale pack

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Andrew Martin BPL Member
PostedMar 1, 2014 at 3:11 pm

I often see discussions of McHale packs on this board and think that the key point about their greatest strength gets lost. They are very flexible packs that are best suited to someone who wants a backpack that can handle mountaineering, ski touring, and backpacking. Their cost is hard to justify simply as a UL backpacking tool but starts to make more sense once you bring more mountain sports into the mix.

For a bit more detail, I just posted a review of my LBP 40 over on the user gear review forums and I'm happy to discuss this viewpoint with anyone or provide more details since I've now dragged that pack around on my back or literally months.

Obviously, you can order a very lightweight and focused pack from Dan but then so much of the value from this unique backpack design is lost.

Stephen M BPL Member
PostedMar 1, 2014 at 3:21 pm

I only have my McHale 6 months but have use it on 6-7 trips and really like it. I think of my McHale Sarc as two packs as sometime use it stripped down to the bare bones saving half a kilo or so.

Andrew Martin BPL Member
PostedMar 1, 2014 at 3:43 pm

I actually think of my pack as 3-in-1:

1.) Top "Brane" on, P&G stays in, bypass straps on, and set of straps on the bottom in: Load carrying monster pack. I've carried 45lbs for an expedition to the Patagonia south ice field like this.

2.) Brane removed, P&G stays removed, and bypass straps and a few other straps off: a really great large summit pack or overnight pack

3.) Top "Brane" only is a really great day-pack or travel satchel and I've stuffed lunch, 1L of water, and the usual hiking supplies in with no problem.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...