Topic

BPL Carrying the new Vargo Decagon?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
PostedJul 20, 2007 at 10:09 am

I'm also interested but since its so new I suspect we'll have to wait a month or two for a user review.

PostedJul 22, 2007 at 9:04 am

I am underwhelmed with mine.

Several of the jets are plugged and I haven't been able to open up some of them with a paperclip. The flame waxes and wanes like it's not staying primed… strange. It seems to be way underpowered, although this could just be the plugged jets. I need to find the right number drill to open them up. Or, just return it.

It's designed like a Whitebox Stove, but right now performance doesn't come close.

Sorry Brian, just being honest.

PostedAug 20, 2007 at 11:54 pm

Underwhelming, indeed. Slow to prime, then yields a low, temperamental blue flame that doesn't rise to coalesce toward the center of the burner. Maybe it's the side-oriented burner holes to blame, or the very low pot placement requirement, or perhaps an inability to sustain an optimal fuel temperature within titanium (vs al. soda can). Or a combination thereof. Mine ran out of fuel before boiling a pint of 50+F H20, then primed slowly once more after refilling and relighting (which I did immediately).

As an experiment I then transferred my pot, soon prior to boil, over to a primed Mogo Gear soda can stove. The water immediately roared to life. Back to the Vargo, and it quieted right down again.

The Vargo, with its built-in pot stand, is just as light as the Mogo. The design is elegant, and most attractive of all, it appears to be bombproof. But would I use it on a long hike, where camp chore time is of the essence? If my initial experiment tells the whole story, then no way.

PostedAug 29, 2007 at 5:54 pm

Mine arrived today. Used 15 ml and Firelite 500 pot. Boiled 2 cups to moderate rolling boil in 8-9 minutes with additional 4 minute burn time. Not as quick as Caldera cone which is what I have been using, but I did not have any problems with plugged jets. My reaction was that it seemed surprisingly efficient and would be simpler to pack than Caldera Cone. Keep this test in perspective – indoors, no wind and first try – not real trail conditions. On the other hand, it seems to be worth a second try before discarding.

PostedAug 29, 2007 at 6:57 pm

Second try, eh?

In fairness to this stove, I was burning HEET, and rather stale HEET at that. So let me redact any exasperation apparent in my earlier post. Need to give it a fair shake first. That said, I'm suspicious of the integrated pot stand. Those clever little knobs atop the burner strike me as an ideal conduit for conductive heat loss.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Loading...