Topic

Arc’teryx TWEAVE 520e, 518c, LF544 and similar soft shell/wind jacket materials: opinion sought

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
PostedDec 18, 2013 at 7:42 pm

For rain protection during activity, some of us follow the philosophy that a wind jacket beats a rain jacket. With the "windproof, waterproof breathables" having air permeability (CFM) of less than 1, we get damp from the inside out. At the other end of the spectrum, "wind resistant water shedding" jackets that have CFMs of 20 to 40 breathe well, but in a heavier rain one will get damp from the outside in. This post is meant for those of us that prefer a jacket that breathes well in activity at the cost of some water penetration. For reference, a light cotton shirt has a CFM of 400 or so (thanks to Richard Nisley).

Also thanks to Richard Nisley we learned that an old time favourite, the Patagonia Houdini jacket, metamorphed from a breathing wind jacket up to 2012 (CFM about 35) to a far less breathable jacket (CFM about 3) in 2013. The best alternative currently appears to be the Rab Cirrus (CFM 20).

I am curious about jackets rarely talked about from the TWEAVE line from Arc'teryx. No doubt one reason is that they are not quite as lightweight, plus more expensive. I am having a hard time finding any experience reports with these jackets, which surprises me because these fabrics seem to be used by military and police. Here is what is offered, at

http://www.wildthingsgear.com from their "design your own" customizable Mountain Guide jacket options:

1) 518c (lightest fabric, CFM 40):

Rugged 84% Nylon construction, DWR (4 ounces/yard)
16% Spandex (fully encapsulated by the nylon)

2) 520e (appears to be their main product, CFM 23):

Rugged 91% Nylon construction, DWR (6.5 ounces/yard)
9% Spandex

3) LF544 (a "shelled microfibre" kind of insulated fabric, CFM 2-10 (a reason for the range is not specified)

35% DWR nylon outer, 43% polyester insulator
22% spandex

I own a pre-2013 Houdini Jacket for warm weather protection, so I do not have a need for the 518c. However, I do not currently have good cool weather protection, with temperatures between -5 to plus 10 Celsius. A CFM of 40 is not that great for cold rain, so the Houdini with an insulating layer underneath isn't what I want. However, I can see two options with the TWEAVE products.

One is the LF544 as a cool weather wind and rain jacket. I have no idea how protective from cold rain such a jacket would be. The rather low CFM 2-10 suggests possibly quite a bit, but is it possible that the bonding process of the microfibre lowers breathability without a proportional gain in water resistance.

An alternative would be the 520e with its (attractively) higher CFM 23, and wear an insulating layer underneath. I do not know how well CFM 23 protects from cold rain. Those who own the Rab Cirrus could probably tell me as its CFM is close (20).

Thoughts?

David Chenault BPL Member
PostedDec 18, 2013 at 8:22 pm

CFM isn't going to have much effect on rain protection. DWR quality will. A greater CFM might (emp. might) allow more body heat transfer which can dry a windshell from the inside and keep it from wetting out over multiple hours of drizzle.

The main problem with those fabric options, and indeed with most "soft shell" fabrics, is the spandex content. Spandex likes water a lot more than polyester or nylon, and thus I'd estimate once those fabrics get wet, they'll be real wet for a while.

IIRC Tweave was built for the military, with abrasion resistance high on the spec sheet. In the windshirt and soft shell realm using the lightest fabrics appropriate for the task is desirable, precisely because once they get wet they can get dry again fast.

PostedDec 18, 2013 at 8:29 pm

That's interesting about spandex David, with a moisture regain of only around 0.6 to 1.2% on average, you would think it wouldn't hold moisture that much. This is much lower than nylon, and more comparable to polyester and acrylic.

Wonder if the stretchy nature has something to do with it?

PostedDec 18, 2013 at 8:39 pm

Klaus, have you researched or looked into Paramo or Furtech type WPB systems? Unfortunately these are only found in Britain currently.

Basically they are like a fairly breathable windjacket layer combined with a light'ish weight, thin half fleece liner. The liner has smaller fibers on the outer surface (fuzzy, very short pile–probably brushed) and larger fibers (smooth) on the inner surface, which physically tends to cause water to keep repelled to the outer part. They do run a bit warm and are best for cooler weather.

They are not truly waterproof in the technical, or usual sense of the term, but work well enough for a lot of conditions. I don't have a lot of experience with these systems so far, but so far so good. I'ved used a 2012 Houdini in combo with one of their "pump" liners.

My experience so far suggests that the shoulders where the straps from a pack are, are the weakest link in these systems (get more wet there). I made a sort of a half, minimalist silnylon poncho to deal with this and to cover my pack at the same time.

PostedDec 18, 2013 at 8:40 pm

The company claims for both the 520e and 518c: "In the event that the garment does get wet, the fabric will hang dry completely in less than 45 minutes, at standard room temperature."

PostedDec 18, 2013 at 9:24 pm

On most occasions I will ditch my hard shell and just take my wild things wind shirt in epic. It breaths better than any hard shell and is sufficiently water resistant for my purposes. I did seal the shoulder and hood seams. I also own a black diamond single wall tent in epic and haven’t experienced the problems in rain that others complain about.

As a point of reference, I’ve been out in heavy rain and prolonged rain, but I haven’t been out in multi-day heavy prolonged rain in either the wind shirt or the tent.

As far as soft shell fabrics go, while I don’t have an issue with soft shell pants in the rain, I prefer the epic fabric wind shirt’s performance to that which I have experienced wearing various soft shell jackets.

David Chenault BPL Member
PostedDec 19, 2013 at 7:44 am

Justin, I've seen rather different numbers for spandex moisture uptake, and my anecdotal experience (and limited empirical experiments) supports something much higher than ~1%.

To function properly, Epic needs to be cleaned. I think most of the leakage in the old BD tents was the result of this.

PostedDec 19, 2013 at 8:21 am

Justin,
Thank you for the Paramo pointer. I spent a few hours reading up. It appears very suitable to my climate, the Canadian Maritimes. Their "Helki" jacket interests me most but Hobbit sizing appears to be a common problem so a Cioch custom order like you did seems approproate. I also found your older post combining it with the Houdini. I'd love to read your experience reports when you have them.

Part of custom sizing is to get a coatlength rather than the short jacket length that's in fashion. For walking about, coat length (going about to the bottom of the crotch) is far more useful for walking about. With that, even in cold rain all I need is marino long johns and DWR treated Columbia nylon pants, plus gortex gaiters.

PostedDec 19, 2013 at 6:37 pm

Hi David,

I'm wondering if it's the hydrophobic level of the material itself, or possibly more of a structure issue?

What i mean is that if individual fibers of spandex are more inherently fibrous or micro porous in nature, then it might hold more moisture than another material with a similar hydrophobic level of the material itself, but which is more solid in nature?

Don't know if this is actually true or not, just a thought, when thinking about why this should be the case. In any case, the end result is the same, it soaks up more moisture than most other synthetics.

PostedDec 19, 2013 at 6:44 pm

Hi Klaus,

Your welcome. When i do some more testing, i will try to remember to write down more specifics and share it later.

I was less impressed with my wife's knock off "pump liner" that i had tried a little while back in combo with the houdini than with my Cioch pump liner. However, it may be because my wife sweated it out on a trip previously, that it reduced the effectiveness of Nixwax DWR treatment some? I hadn't washed it after that trip.

I got a little wet on the back of the arms with it. I'm thinking of also silicone treating the seams of the Houdini to also help with any issues.

PostedDec 20, 2013 at 3:44 am

As a side note: David, are you sure about that higher number ? Because I mostly find something about 1,3 %. Never higher.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Loading...