I'm looking at weekend winter backpacking (Adirondacks) most likely all in lean-tos. I'm looking at the Exped line and have some results I didn't expect. I've ruled out the XTherm.
Here's my analysis:
Downmat XP 9M and EMS CCF
Cost $209
Weight 48.0
R-value 9.0
Downmat UL 7M and RR Solar
Cost $224
Weight 44.0
R-value 9.45
Synmat UL 9M and RR Solar
Cost $214
Weight 41.0
R-value 9.50
If we accept that I would use one of the configurations above, how could I not go with the Synmat? It is the nearly the least expensive, highest thermal rating and the lightest. Frankly, I was stunned. I expected the Downmat, of some stripe, to be the best solution.
There are things I could do such as swap out the EMS CCF for a GG thinlight. It would be more $ but less weight.
I could also forego the EMS CCF altogether and just use the Downmat XP 9 which would then be the lightest and least expensive but the least thermal rated.
Thoughts about the above?

