Topic

MYOG Flicklock Trekking poles 4.7oz/4.9oz two different options

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
James Klein BPL Member
PostedSep 10, 2013 at 7:19 pm

I recently finished up two different flicklock adjusting trekking poles using Easton Aluminum tent poles. I’ll post the details of each in separate posts of this thread:

The first is a two section pole that uses:
(1) 26″ .49″ OD tent pole section with insert
(1) 26″ .433″ OD tent pole section w/out insert
(1) Wilcor replacement tip
(1) Black diamond 13mm replacement flicklock
(1) Mudhole 4″X3/8″ tapered EVA foam grips

Here is a pic if the poles separated:
pole

And a pic of the flicklock and tip
parts

Finished weight is 4.7oz 132gr.
Collapsed length is ~32″
Fully extend length is ~54.5″
Raw cost $15 + ~$25 shipping (you can make a set for ~$55 bc the shipping is about the same for double the parts).

Additional notes:
-Tentpole tip is under the foam grip and adds about 2″ length to the .49 pole section.
-The flicklock is just slightly to large to properly clamp the larger pole. I had to add 2 wraps of scotch tape around the lower pole to provide a good fit.
-The flicklock has a shoulder that sits on the end of the larger pole the ID of this shoulder is slightly smaller than the .433 pole. This results in the clamping force being applied directly to the lower section (reducing the clamping force applied to lower from the upper). To fix this the bore of the shoulder needs to be increase slightly (I used a dremmel).
-The tips is a press fit onto the lower section.
-The grips are very comfortable upside down.
-1-2″ was cut off of the lower to reduce the collapsed length.
-A section of .49 tent pole could be used as a pole jack at the top of the pole bc the grip is not glued to the 2″ section of insert at the top of the pole (the extension pole would slid under the grip and over the pole insert.
-Upper section has a 1/4″ hole drilled just above where flicklock sits with a short slot (1″ long X 1/8 wide) cut from hole to end of pole.

James Klein BPL Member
PostedSep 10, 2013 at 7:20 pm

The other pole I made uses 3 sections of Easton tent poles. Lower section telescopes into the middle and the middle and upper snap together like typical tent poles.

Parts:
(1) 18″ .49″ OD tent pole section w/out insert
(1) 18″ .49″ OD tent pole section w/ insert
(1) 18″ .433″ OD tent pole section w/out insert
(1) Wilcor replacement tip
(1) Black diamond 13mm replacement flicklock
(1) Mudhole 4″X3/8″ tapered EVA foam grips

Here is a pic if the pole separated:
pole

And a pic of the additional hardware I used to shockcord the middle and lower together
parts

Finished weight is 4.9oz 139gr.
Collapsed length is ~23.5″
Fully extend length is ~53.5″
Raw cost $18 + ~$25 shipping (you can make a set for ~$60 bc the shipping is about the same for double the parts).

Additional notes:
-Tentpole insert is at the top of the middle section.
-The tapered cork plug slides inside the middle section and contact the bottom of the insert.
-The black plastic cap sits on the top of the upper pole section.
-Each of the cap and cork plug have a small hole drilled in the center for shock cord (3/32″) to run through.
-Lower had ~2″ cut to reduce collapsed length.
-The same comments about the flicklock, tips, and grips apply here as well

James Klein BPL Member
PostedSep 10, 2013 at 7:59 pm

Here is a pic comparing collapsed length:
collapsed

Here is one comparing the extended length:
fully extended

These end up being similar in stiffness. I initially though the 3 section one might be a little stronger as it has more length at the large diameter and it doesn’t place a joint near the middle of the pole when fully extended but it seems the extra play added by the 2nd joint negates the benefits.
http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=50320
These are noticeably less stiff than the outdoor products poles I have (maybe 20% less). But I think they are more than adequate for my needs (185lb @ 5’10”) and probably compare favorably with fixed length golf shaft poles.

Adjusting the length on the 3 section pole is a little annoying bc you have to place your static hand on the middle section and the working hand on the flicklock (if you try to adjust with one hand on the grip the lower two pole just rotate).
Another slight annoyance is that when the tip gets planted firmly in mud the middle and upper will separate slightly…the shockcord does keep the sections coming apart completely.

IMO the reduced collapsed length easily pays for the weight increase. But I am still not sure which I prefer overall.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Loading...