Topic

MSR Carbon Core vs Groundhog Mini Stakes

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
PostedJun 28, 2013 at 4:46 pm

Anyone have any long term experience with either stake? I've read some threads from a while back where folks were saying the minis looked too short (both types look to be the same size). Anybody have a preference?

Bruce Tolley BPL Member
PostedJun 28, 2013 at 5:03 pm

They work fine and grip in both hard and soft ground. Not cheap though.

PostedJun 28, 2013 at 6:57 pm

Looking back over Will Rietveld's article on stakes, it seems the groundhogs have the best holding power.

Anyone have accurate weights on these to the nearest 1/10th of a gram?

PostedJun 28, 2013 at 8:18 pm

Ray, your review of the Carbon Cores is one of the only ones out there. Tent stakes just don't capture the limelight the way shelters do I guess. Are they still holding up well? I am debating between them and the Minis. Skipping Easton stakes since my experience with them was less than positive.

PostedJun 28, 2013 at 8:36 pm

"Skipping Easton stakes since my experience with them was less than positive."

MSR Carbon Cores are made by Easton.

PostedJun 29, 2013 at 2:13 am

Yes they are, but now that most of my hiking is in MN where we have pretty good soil it is a lot easier on my stakes than when I was in the Sierra most of the time. I am taking them out right now for a few days.

I did wish they were longer last week. They were pulling out in very saturated ground using the StratoSpire 2 in high wind. (And yes Henry does send nice long stakes with it…)

Have a good weekend,

PostedJun 29, 2013 at 8:02 am

Saw those on Stick's blog. Way better price than the Carbon Cores. Problem is I have a gift card to backcountry.com so am trying to go with what I can find there.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Loading...