The pots I was planning on taking were a 3L, 2L, and 1.4L. None of the pots have heat exchangers, though…so I may need to rethink the entire situation. (The two larger pots came from REI, so could easily be returned).
Brian,
The pots you’ve got will probably be fine. The majority of the backpacking world uses “plain” pots. HX pots are great for groups because they speed things up (and are more efficient), but they are more expensive and are heavier. But if you take “plain” pots, it’s not like you’d be making some huge mistake or something.
Honestly, I wasn’t even aware that there were inverted stoves. I have seen a lot of Jetboils and such on the trail, but no inverted. Then again, I am rarely around groups.
Remote canister stoves are in my mind the way to go for pots over about 1.5L in size. They tend to have a wider pot support span and are more stable.
A remote canister stove that has the ability to run with the canister upside down (inverted) is a nice thing for cold weather (generally freezing and below). You probably don’t need inverted capability unless you’re planning a trip where things will be down around freezing or colder, but a lot of remote canister stoves have the inverted capability built in. It doesn’t hurt to have the inverted capability although I suppose there’s some weight penalty.
If money were no object, then maybe I’d get two stoves: a remote canister stove without inverted canister capability for big pots for “three season” use and another remote canister stove for cold weather. As a practical matter though, it’s more convenient to have one remote canister stove that will do both.
There are upright canister stoves that will be fine with pots larger than 1.5L, but I sure feel more comfortable having a remote canister stove with a larger pot. Spilled dinner is no fun.
HJ
Adventures in Stoving