Topic

Wool Midlayer


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Wool Midlayer

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1300629
    Jan S
    Member

    @karl-ton

    I just stumbled over an Icebreaker Sierra Full Zip for 95 € instead of 160 € and am tempted.

    Does anyone have experience with wool mid layers instead of microfleece? How does it dry if wet and how does it hold up in humid conditions?

    #1967255
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    > How does it dry if wet
    Extremely slowly.

    > does it hold up in humid conditions?
    Gets damp, as expected.

    If wet, can distort significantly.

    Cheers

    #1967275
    Justin Baker
    BPL Member

    @justin_baker

    Locale: Santa Rosa, CA

    Don't buy an Icebreaker mid layer. It's a waste of money. You can walk into a thrift store and find light wool sweaters for almost free. I picked up two wool sweaters that weigh about 10 oz each and work well under a windshirt for $3 each. Most wool sweaters are more lofty and warm than technical wool "mid layers" which are usually too dense.
    Fleece is better in most situations. It's lighter and it dries faster. But wool is a bit warmer when wet, so the only situation where it's better is in extended wet conditions where your clothing will constantly be wet. Sometimes in cold weather the slower dry time of wool prevents rapid evaporative cooling.
    So really, just stick with fleece or pick up some wool sweaters from your local thrift store to try out. The only time you need to spend real money on wool is for comfortable base layers.
    I really like wool and use it a lot, but this new wool trend in backpacking is just silly and a result of very clever marketing by smartwool, ibex, ect. to get you to pay much more for a product that is inferior to synthetics in most situations.

    #1967300
    Max Dilthey
    Spectator

    @mdilthey

    Locale: MaxTheCyclist.com

    I like Ibex. I tolerate Smartwool (but they have the best socks). Icebreaker falls short of both of those, in my opinion.

    The only Icebreaker item I have that I like are my Icebreaker bike shorts. Everything else, I go Ibex or Smartwool.

    #1967307
    Packman Pete
    BPL Member

    @packmanpete

    Locale: Rainy Portland

    Some wool layers work fine next to skin, and the really thin ones can dry out fairly quickly if you are generating heat.

    #1967319
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    We used to wear wool sweaters when cross country skiing. I chuckled when I read Roger's comment on distortion. That's putting it mildly: more like wool flavored pasta slung around my arms and trunk. I wouldn't think of anything but fleece now. I like merino wool socks, but it ends there.

    #1967320
    Edward Jursek
    BPL Member

    @nedjursekgmail-com

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    Just look at Roger C's picture! Wool mid-layer advice? Really? Must be why he ditched his base layer, too . . . .

    #1967347
    Steven McAllister
    BPL Member

    @brooklynkayak

    Locale: Arizona, US

    I like light merino wool base layers for the comfort, odor prevention and warm feeling when wet, but fleece or similar light synthetic for the mid layer.
    Wool holds a little more water when wet, takes a little longer to dry and is heavier, especially when wet.

    A loose light weave wool sweaters can be quite good combined with a wind shell in wet weather, but some of the more technical fleece sweaters will be lighter and a little drier.

    I would be happy hiking in a light wool sweater midlayer if I got it for a good price, but if I were going to spend the money for a new item, I'd take the grid style fleece sweater.

    #1967741
    michael levi
    Member

    @m-l

    Locale: W-Never Eat Soggy (W)affles

    An ibex indie hoodie and a windshirt is pretty versitale.

    #1967754
    Jan S
    Member

    @karl-ton

    After getting my suspicions confirmed I think I'll stay with my fleece jumper. Works well enough given that it was £10 on sale somewhere in Scotland.

    Cheers everyone.

    #1967774
    Max Dilthey
    Spectator

    @mdilthey

    Locale: MaxTheCyclist.com

    As for noodling sleeves, my Lightweight Smartwool Merino Wool shirt noodles like there's no tomorrow. it's not fun.

    However…

    My Smartwool midweight Baselayer Crew has never stretched or distorted. I'm confident in this, since, I have literally worn it every single day since October, plus frequent use throughout spring and summer 2012. I've never worn an item as much, probably ever, and it's still going strong- looks brand new. It's been underneath almost every pair of backpack straps I've ever used, every time I've used them (except one early Fall trip).

    #1967833
    Dena Kelley
    BPL Member

    @eagleriverdee

    Locale: Eagle River, Alaska

    I am complete convert to wool base and mid layers. I don't pay retail prices, though. Steep and Cheap frequently offers Icebreaker and other Merino's cheap and I get all of my stuff there. It doesn't stink, it's anti-microbial, and I prefer the feel of it to synthetics. The only downside to wool, IMO, is that it requires some babying. I wash on the gentle cycle or hand wash, and line dry. On the flip side, I don't have to wash it often.

    #1967834
    Max Dilthey
    Spectator

    @mdilthey

    Locale: MaxTheCyclist.com

    I will supplement Dena's very keen observations by saying my higher-quality wool stuff, like my Smartwool layers, have had the crap beaten out of them. I use regular detergent, regular wash cycle, high-heat drying. Nothing different when it comes out except maybe some lint if I forgot to empty the trap.

    My Stoic merino t-shirt, however, shredded when it got grabbed by accident. I won't buy Merino from Stoic, just because I think the quality is lower (same with the price, though)

    #1967931
    Mark Fowler
    BPL Member

    @kramrelwof

    Locale: Namadgi

    In the past there were not many options for warm layers and wool was the best of the natural fibres apart from fur. Back then we didn't have alternatives for warm layers that were relatively warm and handled wet conditions almost acceptably.

    Lightweight base layers (<200gsm) provide the best performance because their "good" properties (odour control, warmth) outweigh their "bad" properties (holds water, slow to dry). As you go to heavier wool layers you change the balance with "bad" properties starting to outweigh the "good". More wool (heavier weight fabric) = more water retention, much slower to dry, heavier than alternatives. In relatively dry conditions heavier wool can work well but usually with a weight penalty, in damp/wet conditions this changes for the worse. Moving back to wool for mid and outer layers is like a return to the 1960's and before. Lets have a return to tweed for outer wear.

    #1967975
    Jan S
    Member

    @karl-ton

    I got the baselayer covered with a shortsleeve from Icebreaker that is relatively new but okay so far and merino boxers (I try to avoid long johns for some reason but have fleece tights I use in winter). The best shirt I ever owned is surprisingly a Silkbody long sleeve. Surprisingly because it's made of 72% silk, 13% merino wool and 13% cotton and for me it's great from -10 C (never got colder here) to 30 C.

    I never managed to actually wear synthetic base layer clothes longer then a day and was happy to get out of them. Never liked the feeling, the too fast drying and the smell.

    As for the back the 1960s thing: I'm not sure if that's a bad thing sometimes. There has been an Everest expedition that tried to climb it in clothes made the same way that people like Mallory had around 1925. No down, just silk and linen. They said they were surprised how well it worked and that from their perspective the differences between modern high tech materials and down and the old style was very, very small. I'm not saying that this is true for wool too, but I don't think that old necessarily means bad when it comes to materials and techniques.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...