New to MRE’s

The thing about MRE's is you are mostly carrying the additional water weight. These maybe good in arid temps where you may be carrying water anyways but probably too heavy for other uses. Also the taste is rather bland as not to be rejected by most populations + the menu is limited and only changes every several years … but eventually the palate tires of this. The Army introduced the MRE to my platoon in Korea in '84 back when I was enlisted but the novelty wore off quick.

Maybe a company needs to make gourmet MRE's??

(Add: Probably a good addition to a bug-out bag for natural disasters too; just don't store them in the trunk of your car in the summer)

I might take them for convenience; can be eaten cold, no extra water needed, but otherwise they're pretty heavy. They are certainly better than MH though, if for no other reason than they aren't as lethally salty.

They are just plain heavy. Also, you can get lighter, better gazing, cheaper food from any grocery.

Not to sound defensive but how are they even remotely considered heavy? an 8 oz entree with 1200 cals. Thats 150 calories per ounce, about the same as peanut butter (even ultralighters eat peanut butter), but with more nutrients (14g fiber, 30g protein, 54g fat). Add to that, the fact that I can save stove and fuel weight, which for me is 13 oz, and just how is it heavier than traditional backpacking foods?

Also, as far as the grocery store goes, show me to how jam 30g of protein, 14g of fiber, 54g of fat etc into eight ounces of food? I would love that!

@HK Not following you on that. As it is I dont "carry" my dinner water, I get it from a stream or lake when its dinner time.

"Also, as far as the grocery store goes, show me to how jam 30g of protein, 14g of fiber, 54g of fat etc into eight ounces of food? I would love that!"

Peanut butter eclipses it.

Greg

Most MRE entrees* are not dried or dehydrated in any sort of way, thus the water (and therefore the water weight) is locked into the food item already, which can add up depending on the number of meals. Contrast this to most backpacking meals which require the user to reconstitute the meal with boiling stream or river water.

*There used to be a quite tasty salisbury steak dehydrated entree but think they discontinued it as heating water for troops is a PITA.

I have a box full of these. An army guy gave them to me because he knew I backpacked and was convince they were light. The first one I picked out is an 8 ounce entrees at 240 calories. That's 30 calories per ounce. That's heavy. Its vegetable lasagna. The other packages are similarly heavy. I have not seen any carrying the calories you mention.

If yours have 1200 calories in an 8 ounce packet, I would consider them. I have never seen an Mrs in that range, though, unless you consider the M&M packets, etc.

Based on my numbers, almost anything at the grocery is lighter.

The water weight might be OK if you're desert hiking and carrying all your water anyway. They might be a better option there.

@ Ben C: I have the nutrition info right in from of me. It says 1230 calories, and I weighed the entree myself at just over 8 oz.

"Also, as far as the grocery store goes, show me to how jam 30g of protein, 14g of fiber, 54g of fat etc into eight ounces of food? I would love that!"

Peanut butter eclipses it.

Correct, but just barely. And while I dont mind eating peanut butter for breakfast lunch and dinner, I bet a lot of the "ultralight sissys" as I refer to them would object. MRE's stack up against peanut butter, which is the gold standard for hikers. Besides, even if they are comparable, ones a hot meal and ones not. So that right there gives the MRE an edge.

If your entree says it has 1230 calories by itself, then it must be some commercial equivalent to a military MRE. Each military MRE 'bag' contains, on average, 1250 Kcal (13 percent protein, 36 percent fat, and 51 percent carbs), all inclusive.

I know there are companies who also make MRE-type meals for the disaster-preparedness crowd. Perhaps you have an MRE made by one of them.

More than you ever wanted to know about MREs procured by DoD: http://nsrdec.natick.army.mil/media/print/OP_Rations.pdf

WOW! 150C per OUNCE!!!
Where can I get these? That's almost 20C per ounce better than I do.

Will you post more info on these mres. I have looked into this in the past and they were heavy and bulky. Can you post a pict of the labels. Almost sounds like the calories are for the whole meal not the entre. No way they come close to pnb

Greg, I haven't seem mres with numbers you mention. Is it possible that the 1200 calories is for everything in the bag and not the single entree? The numbers you mention are not consistent with what I have heard others mention or what's in my box of mres.

Every on-line source I find gives an average of 1250 cals per entire MRE, and a weight of 18 – 26 ounces (depending on menu).

MRE packs are moderately new (last twenty years or so). Before that, we had C-rations, and those were mostly canned foods. I actually gained weight on that stuff. If you keep going back in history, the army has always needed to make its meals easily available for the troops. Now, General Grant always provided salt pork and crackers for us.

Ahh, you young whippersnappers!

–B.G.–

http://www.readymeal.com/store/home.php

I have the nutrition info for homestyle chicken in front of me. It says "Serving Size 1 package; 1190 calories" The cookie, pop tart, peanut butter and crackers it comes with also have their own individual nutrition infos on their packaging (between 200-300 calories each). So im pretty positive the 1200 mark is for just the entree. I know, so sorry to disappoint, folks here usually think im wrong right off the bat. Must suck to know Im actually right sometimes.

BTW, the A-Pack meals claim "Just one meal meets an individual's full daily caloric needs" so if indeed I am wrong and 1200 is for the whole package, thats a bunch of BS then, whos living on 1200 cals a day?

After reading the nutritional label it seems the 1180 calories for the spaghetti dinner is for the whole meal including the pop tart etc. there are much denser meals out there than this.

MREs work well if you have the logistical support and motorized access of the US Military.

So, if you are car camping, by all means take the MREs. :) (I would argue that some inexpensive canned goods and instant brown rice makes a better car camping meal, though!)

When the US military 'backpacks' though, they take meals not far removed from the commercial freeze dried meals many people use.

http://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/subs/rations/programs/mcw/mcwabt.asp
http://www.mreinfo.com/us/older/lrp-dscp-archive-page.html
http://www.mreinfo.com/us/current/current-us-rations.html

In fact, Oregon Freeze dried (the maker of freeze dried Mountain House meals) makes the LRP/MCW freeze dried rations for the military:
http://www.ofd.com/food/military/military.cfm

So, if the military does not takes MREs when "backpacking", why should we? :D

Im talking about using them for overnight trips, two nights at the most, not regular backpacking, and only at times where I want to go ultralight and not carry a stove. Can you use dehydrated stuff without a stove, using the MRE heater? If so then of course I'd be all for it. But again, if the entree I have is 1200 cals (why would they print the info for the cookie and pop tart on separate packages but also lumped onto the one thats on the entree?), dehydrated is not coming close to that in terms of calories. Mountain house meals that supposedly serve two give you like 300 calories per person!!

you will find this list of ingredients with the calorie info.
The 1190 calories is for everything. Misunderstanding the label could leave you hungry.

INGREDIENTS: HOMESTYLE CHICKEN WITH NOODLES AND VEGETABLES IN SAUCE ENTRÉE: WATER, CHICKEN, CARROTS, ENRICHED PASTA (DURUM FLOUR (WHEAT), EGGS, EGG WHITES, GLYCERYL MONOSTEARATE, NIACIN, IRON (FERROUS SULFATE), THIAMIN MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN AND FOLIC ACID), PEAS (PEAS, SALT), MODIFIED FOOD STARCH, RENDERED CHICKEN FAT, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF THE FOLLOWING: CHICKEN BROTH, RED BELL PEPPER, SALT, GARLIC POWDER, ONION POWDER, SPICE. OATMEAL COOKIE: SUGAR, ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (BLEACHED FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), VEGETABLE SHORTENING (PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN AND COTTONSEED OILS), OATMEAL, CORN SYRUP, SPICES, SALT, BAKING SODA. FROSTED BROWN SUGAR TOASTER PASTRY: ENRICHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACINAMIDE, REDUCED IRON, THIAMIN MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), BROWN SUGAR, VEGETABLE OIL (SOYBEAN, COTTONSEED AND HYDROGENATED COTTONSEED OIL WITH TBHQ AND CITRIC ACID FOR FRESHNESS), SUGAR, CORN SYRUP, DEXTROSE, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, CRACKER MEAL, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF SALT, CORNSTARCH, LEAVENING (BAKING SODA, SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE), CINNAMON, WHEAT STARCH, GELATIN, CARAMEL COLOR, SOY LECITHIN, NIACINAMIDE, REDUCED IRON, VITAMIN A PALMITATE, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE, RIBOFLAVIN, THIAMIN HYDROCHLORIDE, FOLIC ACID. PEANUT BUTTER: ROASTED PEANUTS, SUGAR, HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL (RAPESEED, COTTONSEED AND/OR SOYBEAN OILS), SALT, VITAMIN C*, VITAMIN A*, VITAMIN B6, THIAMIN. *INGREDIENTS NOT IN REGULAR PEANUT BUTTER. CRACKER: ENRICHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), VEGETABLE SHORTENING (PARTIALLY HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN OIL WITH TBHQ TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS), YEAST, CALCIUM CARBONATE, SALT, SODIUM BICARBONATE, EXTRACT OF MALTED BARLEY AND CORN. PEPPERMINT: SUGAR, CORN SYRUP, NATURAL PEPPERMINT OIL, RED 40, BLUE 1. LEMONADE DRINK MIX: CITRIC ACID, SODIUM CITRATE, ASPARTAME**, NATURAL FLAVOR, LEMON JUICE SOLIDS, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE AND YELLOW 5. **PHENYLKETONURICS: CONTAINS PHENYLALANINE.

Darn. They could save a lot of weight by just cutting the ingredients down to three-syllable words.

–B.G.–

Yeah but most of those ingredients are "less than 2% of" so they probably dont weigh that much :)

If thats indeed the case, then Im pretty bummed. I dont understand why theyd print it all under "1200 calories" but also print each of the calories of the pop tart, cookie, etc, on their individual packages. A phone call tomorrow will hopefully sort it out for sure. I understand they are emergency rations, per se, but even in an emergency, 1200 calories a day is not very substantial. The military style MREs have to contain way more calories right?

"If thats indeed the case, then Im pretty bummed. I dont understand why theyd print it all under "1200 calories" but also print each of the calories of the pop tart, cookie, etc, on their individual packages. A phone call tomorrow will hopefully sort it out for sure. I understand they are emergency rations, per se, but even in an emergency, 1200 calories a day is not very substantial. The military style MREs have to contain way more calories right?"

If you are in a defensive position, ie, sitting still and simply manning an emplacement, sleeping, reading, etc…1200C is about right for this sedentary activity. Hiking will burn upwards of 3-5 times more, depending on the nature of the hike…3500-5500C. Canoing/kayaking all day (12hrs) will burn about 3500-4500C/day. Climbing will use somewhat more, flatland hiking over well groomed trails, somewhat less.

The individual labelling lets a military person pick and choose high density foods. 300C for a 2.5oz chicolate chip cookie is not too bad. After deducting all the add- on's (crackers, cookies, cheese-whiz, etc) I believe you will find the entrie is about 60-70C/oz. I did this about 25years ago and haven't checked it recently. Food hasn't really changed in the past few thousand years…water weight still has no calories.

"If you are in a defensive position, ie, sitting still and simply manning an emplacement, sleeping, reading, etc…1200C is about right for this sedentary activity"

For a physically fit, under 35 year-old, the "just lying on the couch with the remote" number is somewhere between 2000 an 2400 calories per day.

That's why two a day is the usual issue for MRE in the field.