"You lost all your food, right?"
Actually not, but that is another story.
"And what do you think is going to happen the next time those grizzlies see people?"
No danger of that – they have passed on by now. At that time, they probably had done and would do the same thing later that they did to me. Scare me away from my pack to get at whatever food I was carrying.
"… overly inflated idea …"
Sorry, I cannot relate to statistical arguments. I've been listening to them all this election year, and most of it has turned out to be bushwah. At the time this incident occurred, there were a number of injuries from bear attacks that year, warnings were posted and some trails were closed. Nowadays, bear cans might well be required in such a situation, and that's all to the good.
"People shouldn't give up your food unless they're being attacked."
If two of them moving toward me 20-30 feet away is not being attacked, when do I know I'm being attacked? After their claws and teeth get hold of me? And then I can let them have the food bag. Like that's my decision to make? Righto.
Absolutely agree with Kevin B's approach when hiking around grizzlies. But the OP was not looking for info about that, so I regret mentioning a grizz incident that sidetracked this thread. My only reason for bringing it up was to illustrate that bears have an incredible sense of smell, and carrying the food separately to minimize odors getting into the pack is a good idea. That way, in the NE US at least, you can probably safely keep the pack dry and have access to it in the tent vestibule, say, without having to hang it up some distance away.
Buck, I would be less confident about the dangers of even black bears being overinflated. These are powerful creatures, capable of dispatching any of us in a flash, and there is no sure way of knowing what is going to get under their skin. They could be ill, or wounded by another animal, starving for food, or trying to protect their young – any number of things. It is not a science. We have to be very careful.