Topic
Winter backpacking and 2WD cars with chains?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Winter backpacking and 2WD cars with chains?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 10, 2012 at 9:49 am #1934504
David Olson: "Cut down dump truck chains will get you through
snow pushing on the grill." Really? That sounds like fun, except that it'd probably destroy the front of my car's sheet metal(i.e. plastic).Snow tires: When I tried Nokian Hakkepelitta, they worked well on snow and ice but wore strangely on dry pavement, causing a vibration. Bridgestone Blizzak is what I use now, much better traction on snow or ice than all season tires. The Tirerack website has tests comparing brands of winter tires and comparing winter tires to all season tires. It is interesting that in their tests a 2wd car stopped faster than a 4wd on ice.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/testDisplay.jsp?ttid=103
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/testDisplay.jsp?ttid=167Clearance: This is the main limitation with my FWD Honda Fit. The only time I've gotten really stuck with the Fit I was hung up on snow just a little too deep.
Winter in upstate NY driving an Alfa Romeo was interesting. Rear wheel drive, but with studded snow tires on the rear it was pretty good on snow/ice. It would start reliably at -20F, unfortunately it would get to -30F there. The defroster was completely inadequate — it was great fun driving with the window at 0F to keep the windshield clear.
Dec 10, 2012 at 11:19 am #1934534"Really? That sounds like fun, except that it'd probably destroy the front of my car's sheet metal(i.e. plastic)."
Works only on vehicles like pickups that have lots of clearance all the way round. Even some new pickups may require
special low clearance chains tho .If you have an old 1/2 ton 2 wheel drive Chevy or Ford and want to surprise snowmobilers and piss off
drivers with expensive 4×4's, just put some on, grab a couple of buddies with shovels, and hit the unplowed forest service roads.A come-a-long or winch, and logging chain or tow strap, maybe a high lift jack, may come in handy when you get stuck.
Dec 10, 2012 at 11:51 am #1934543Is there any advantage putting chains on the other pair of wheels which doesn't get any power from the engine.
I bought a pair of expensive link based chains for the front wheels and a cheap cable pair for the rear wheels. With all 4 wheels on some sort of traction, I believe it should be easy for the car move without sliding sideways on ice.
Dec 10, 2012 at 12:00 pm #1934545" The RAV 4 Four Wheel Drive is less money than the AWD Subaru AND has better highway mileage because of the Rav 4's 2 WD, front drive setup. With a Subi your're always in four wheel drive, like it or not. It's the nature of AWD, thus the lower overall gas mileage.
Both cars have about the same ground clearance, which is to say "moderate", hot high clearance as in a Jeep Wrangler. BE ADVISED!"
Forester starts out at lower price than a 2wd Rav4. Outback is a bit more. All three cars get very similar fuel ratings despite Subi AWD.
Forester and Outback have same ground clearance as Jeep Wrangler Sport. Rav4 is lower.
Dec 10, 2012 at 12:02 pm #1934546If you are going to get chains, make sure to get the fancy quick mount style with the hoops. As people pointed out, you will be putting them on in unpleasant conditions, so less hassle is worth the extra $$.
The style with the cable hoops goes on very fast and comes off with less tangling.
Dec 10, 2012 at 12:30 pm #1934555For a lot of years, vast numbers of people worked out in snow with nothing but 2wd and chains, and did fine. Forces you to be a good driver and plan, but it works. When I was a kid, it wasn't unusual to see tracks in 10" of snow in the bar ditch, where some oilfield pumper drove down to the next lease road in the ditch so he wouldn't have to take chains off and put them back on.
Otherwise…………….4wd gets you stuck deeper, farther from the highway!
Dec 11, 2012 at 7:48 am #1934713"1.Always, ALWAYS carry a new, undamaged nylon tow strap (hooks on both ends and rated for much more than your vehicle's weight). This is so kindly 4WD trucks can snatch you from distress."
Eric, I'm one of the kindly 4WD trucks that occasionally snatches sedans (but more often other 4WD trucks…) from distress. As someone who has performed many dozens, perhaps even a hundred vehicle recoveries, my advice is to carry a nylon YANK strap, not a tow strap, and even more importantly, carry one WITHOUT hooks on the ends. Simple nylon loops are much preferred.
The yanker or "snatch" strap rather than a tow strap because the snatch strap is specifically designed to yield and rebound on shock loading for snatching vehicles from distress. Tow straps are specifically designed NOT to yield making the recovery process significantly more violent and likely to damage both vehicles but especially the stuck sedan. Also, snatch straps are typically rated for much higher working load limits than tow straps.
Good snatch straps don't have hooks on them though, only cheap crap straps have hooks. For the simple fact that should the strap break (which they do, all too often), a hook on the end can become a dangerous missile.
As a kindly 4WD truck owner I carry a full array of recovery gear and so don't depend on the stuckees (usually cheap/dangerous) straps. I carry high quality ones. But the single biggest problem with most vehicles I stop to help (and I ALWAYS stop if at all possible), is a lack of suitable recovery point. All too often on todays cars, there simply isn't anywhere to easily attach a strap that isn't likely to damage the vehicle when pulling force is applied. Often, either myself or the owner ends up covered in muck and wet from climbing around under the vehicle attaching the strap to an axle or frame member. Not uncommonly though, due to angles and lack of attachment point, I can't pull a stuck sedan out of a ditch without damaging it. Just have to get a wrecker on the scene that can gently lift without a straight hard pull.
– Dave
Dec 11, 2012 at 11:20 am #1934764Dave,
I need a new strap anyway since it got a bit frayed by a VW running over it after I pulled him from a snowbank. The idiot never stopped as I told him to do and would not even pay for a new strap. "No good deed goes unpunished."
So now I'll get a proper snatch strap per your advice. My RAV 4 carries 2 tow eyebolts that screw into the front bumper once I pop off the hole covers from the bumper cover and screw them in. So at least I'm sure of corrrect tow points. In the rear are shipping tie-down points.
Dec 11, 2012 at 11:33 am #1934771Pros- Within 500 miles of a 200,000 mile odometer rollover. New radiator, strut and brake work the only major costs so far. Studded snows an all 4 fours. Fully independent suspension on all
fours like the first army jeeps and the back of VW bugs (which do well in the snow). Higher clearance than RAV's and most
Suburu. Great for snowy roads, better than high clearance trucks due the center of gravity,Cons- Lack of low range makes all the mini sport utes no good for trail/ steep rough roads tho.
I don't know about new RAV's but the old ones weren't big enough to hold an infant seat.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.