Aug 10, 2012 at 9:06 am #1292839
Paul WagnerBPL Member
@balzaccomLocale: Wine Country
Did you lose a pair of reading glasses?
When we go into the backcountry, we often go out of our way to find more remote and private campsites. Part of the joy of backpacking is the sense of solitude and isolation that we find. And that means that we often find ourselves camping boldy where no man has camped before.
Well, not really. But you get the idea. Show us the usual sites, and we'll often look for something a bit farther afield.
On this last trip, we were off the John Muir Trail, exploring trails and routes that didn't get so much traffic. And when we stopped for the night, we often spent 45 minutes or more finding a place to camp that would be away from the madding crowd–or at least other hikers. In one case, we considered one campsite, then decided to move on. But before we moved on M noticed a pair of glasses on a log. She actually ought they were mine, and handed them to me. But I had mine right where I wanted them—on my face.
This pair had been on the log for a while, judging from the water spots and corrosion on the frames, so we tossed them in our pack and added them to the junk we've found on the trail.
And then a few days later, we were even farther off the grid, and M wandered off in the woods to do what bears do. Of course, she likes to get far away even from our isolated campsite for that particular activity. When she returned, she was laughing, and holding up a pair of glasses. A different pair.
So we have two pairs of reading glasses right now. They are both about 1.5 magnification, and we'll donate them to a local charity shop.
But it does make you wonder how many other pairs are out there…and how many people are having trouble reading their topo maps.Aug 10, 2012 at 2:54 pm #1901719
Could it have been a themed geochaching? You can get OTC reading glasses for a couple dollars, much cheaper than an Otterbox filled with goodies.Aug 10, 2012 at 3:35 pm #1901733
Sarah KirkconnellBPL Member
@sarbarLocale: In the shadow of Mt. Rainier
Lol…I know if I lost my glasses I'd be in serious trouble. I can only imagine trying to drive home without them – it'd be scary ;-)
It is so bad I carry a spare pair no matter the weight. That bad.Aug 10, 2012 at 4:19 pm #1901738
Justin BakerBPL Member
@justin_bakerLocale: Santa Rosa, CA
If I lost my glasses, I would be soooo screwed. I could easily put myself in a survival situation if I was off trail. I am near sighted, I can actually read without my glasses if I had to, but I can't see things far off… which is much worse.
And I would not be able to drive home, maybe very slowly to the nearest place I could call from.
I ALWAYS carry an extra pair. Laser surgery is on my list of things to get done.Aug 11, 2012 at 9:36 am #1901844
Ken HelwigBPL Member
@kennyhel77Locale: Scotts Valley CA via San Jose, CA
I now where glasses and on my last trip I did not bring them due to me being afraid of losing them….well I found out one tough lesson……it is hard to read maps, especially when you are heading cross country and need to read your map properlyAug 12, 2012 at 4:47 pm #1902089
Piper S.BPL Member
@sbhikesLocale: Santa Barbara (Name: Diane)
Somebody is going to find a penny whistle in the Winds someday, somewhere near Titcomb Lake. Key of Eb.Aug 13, 2012 at 10:55 pm #1902511
@m-lLocale: W-Never Eat Soggy (W)affles
Contacts are lighter…Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 am #1904201
So what's the weight/dollar gain for getting lasik so you can give up your glasses?Aug 20, 2012 at 4:17 pm #1904298
Tom KirchnerBPL Member
@ouzelLocale: Pacific Northwest/Sierra
"I ALWAYS carry an extra pair."
Anyone whose vision is impaired to the point where they would be at risk if they lost their corrective lenses, of whatever type, would be foolhardy not to carry backup. This is one of those places where redundancy is justified, and d@mn the weight penalty, IMO. It shouldn't be more than 3 or so ounces in any case.Aug 20, 2012 at 4:35 pm #1904305
David ThomasBPL Member
@davidinkenaiLocale: North Woods. Far North.
A monocle on a string would weigh 1/4 of what a full pair of glasses does and do a lot for you compared to going without.
For the very far-sighted, it is easy – buy extreme reading glasses at the drugstore for $10-15, saw in half, and remove the bow pieces. Viola'! Two monocles with the screwhole in the hinge to run a thread through. A little friction tape or painting the rim with the dip-your-tool-in-to-make-a-coated-handle goo and it would grip between your brow ridge and cheek better. Put a alligator/roach clip on the end of the string to clip to your lapel.
Likewise for the very near-sighted, but you have to score an old pair of prescription glasses. Maybe from the "Lions Club Eyes for Africa" donation box or whatever they call that program. Take out the closest prescription to your own and put in $20 to balance your karma. Or look on eBay. Or use an old pair of your own – we all keep them but never use them. Or get prescription swim googles on eBay for $19.95 to $24.95 – I've gotten many for me and the kids. Cut it down, one lense or two, and put a thin (shoe-lace-sized) bungie cord so you can wear it like an eye patch. It already has a cushy rim all around it. Spit on the inside or apply a tiny, teeny bit of soap and wipe it clean. That will greatly reduce the condensation while in use.Aug 20, 2012 at 6:34 pm #1904349
Glasses keep gnats out of my eyes.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.