I agree with Eric. There have been lots of criticisms of the EN13537 ratings and testing system, but IMHO they are the most objective criteria we currently have. It's discouraging that they are often misused here in the US. I keep seeing the "extreme" number (the temp at which you hopefully won't be dead of hypothermia in the morning) used to rate bags (I don't think that number should be there at all), and seeing the "lower limit" (for men/warm sleepers) number used to rate women-specific bags.
While I love my Western Mountaineering sleeping bag, it's quite discouraging to have to go to UK websites to find their EN13537 ratings! They sell their bags in Europe, so they have to have them tested–why aren't the results on the WM website? What are they trying to hide?
For a good layperson's guide to these ratings, read this blog entry from Philip at SectionHiker:
http://sectionhiker.com/deciphering-en13537-sleeping-bag-temperature-ratings/

