Fuji x100 vs Oly E-M5

Hi Brendan,

If your prime concern is finding the better one-camera solution, the E-M5 would seem to be the right path–you get to choose your lens(es) and the camera itself has far more capabilities. I've taken mine on a total of one backpacking trip, in miserable weather as it turned out, and am already sold. I used it mostly with the 12-50, and a bit with the 45/1.8 (which is not weatherproof, but fast and very sharp wide open). FWIW the 12-50's macro capability is surprisingly good.

I do admire the X100 but would probably go for the X-Pro1 despite the greater weight and price. The single fixed lens is simply too limiting, IMHO, based on using a DP1.

Good luck!

Rick

If, like you said you were only going to use something like the 20 1.7, with the OMD, then I think the X100 would be the better choice, as it has a wonderful macro mode, plus the auto stitch mode, for wide vista shots, or whatever.

I have the X100 and with the recent firmware upgrades and a 95 mb a sec. card, it's a pretty decent camera now and the image quality is a good step above my GH2 ( don't have the OMD).

If, however you want more choices for lenses, specially for the tele end, then the OMD would be a better choice, although the larger sensor on the X100 does allow for more cropping than the 4/3 sensor does, for sure.

A weather sealed body without a weather sealed lens, sort of negates that benefit.

Both of those will be what you make of them, fully capable cameras for image making. I flip flopped between the X100 and waiting for the E-M5, but was sold by the X100 for several reasons, the image quality first and foremost, which is excellent with the fixed lens. The styling is unobtrusive, it is a camera that I have no reservations slinging around my chest everyday.

There are and will be better cameras than the X100, it has its fair share of flaws and quirks, but they can all be worked around quite easily. I sold my very capable Nikon D7000 and acquired lenses because it sat in a bag most of the time, this wasn't a camera that I enjoyed slinging around with me on a regular basis.

Check your exif data and find what focal length you typically settle with.

Pecos Wilderness, 7/2/12. Fuji X100 ISO200 f16-1/100 0ev 23mm

right now my family has an x100, om e-m5, fuji x-pro1, panasonic gh2, a s90, and just received a sony rx100. We plan to downsize and sell / pass on several of these cameras. clearly the s90 is going, but which others we will keep and which we will get rid of is a really hard choice. I guess if we could keep just one camera it would be the OM E-M5 because the image quality is decent, with one of the pancake lens it's pretty light / compact, and I appreciate the versatility of the multiple lens, even if 80% of the time I use the 20/1.7 lens.

the x100 fits my me really well. It's my everyday carry camera. I love the ergonomics (though the menu system could be better). if it had the x-pro1 sensor, I could maybe consider this being my only camera… but I prefer better low light performance for a good bit of my non backpacking photography and having other lens lengths is useful… though if I am honest, most likely 90% of my images can be handled by it's lens. So my minimalist leanings would love this to be my only camera, but practically suggests this is one of the camera that will ultimately go.

I *love* the image quality of the x-pro1… but the speed and accuracy of the auto focus, and the pain of using manual focus is a real handicap. Hopefully a firmware upgrade will improve this soon, just as fuji fixed a number of problems with the X100. The other downside is while not not huge, and certainly lighter than many DSLRs, the x-pro1 camera is larger than you might expect. The x100 slips inside my everyday carry bag, the x-pro1 even with the smallest lens doesn't.

The gh2 is better for video and the fully articulated screen is quite useful at times. The e-m5 has 1-2 stop advantage, but at low ISO settings I don't find the e-m5 having significantly better image quality.

the size of the s90 was perfect, but very rarely was I satisfied with image quality. It was what I would take on backpacking trips when I was really trying to keep weight down… but most of the time a heavier camera came on the trip. I am hoping the sony rx100 which be good enough that I won't feel compelled to bring a larger / heavier camera. We will see if that is the case.

–Mark

Excellent feedback, everyone. Thanks. I feel like the E-M5 is the wiser choice but I really want the X100, mainly for simplicity and a bit better image quality. I feel like I'd carry and use it more, but there will probably be times where I'd miss the versatility of the E-M5. I've definitely checked out the Xpro1 but it's a bit too spendy for me and does appear a bit more bulky.

Mark, have you compared prints of the E-M5/X100/Xpro1?

Eugene, I love the sheep pic. Good stuff.

rarely print, and not enough from these recently cameras to say a lot . mostly view on high res display. The Xpro1 is the champ generally. I have been pleased with both the X100 and E-M5 so long as I keep ISO at 1000 or less.

–Mark

I am pleased with my x100 so far. I haven't worked on any RAW files yet, but jpegs are excellent. It certainly isn't the perfect camera, but for me the combination of small size, simplicity and high image quality was perfect.

There has been a fun great video shootout running for a month or so. Video is one of the reasons that I am still holding onto the GH2… it has worked well, and it did well again other cameras costing 10x,

–mark

I own both.

They are not comparable.

If I had to choose one, I'd choose the OMD E-M5

I have a review and comparison of them on my blog here:

http://larsonweb.com/blog/?cat=4

I own the X100 and also have a D700. For hiking and quick use I like the X100. When I need more versatility I use the D700. I don't have a problem with on lens when hiking. As you note most of your shots would be with a single focal length. If I had to start all over again I would probably have a X PRO 1 with a few lenses and D7000 for tele work.

Pixel peepers can now compare the two at DxOMark, who finally released their E-M5 evaluation. Basically a push, with a slight edge to the Fuji in high-ISO performance.

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Compare-Camera-Sensors/Compare-cameras-side-by-side/(appareil1)/793%7C0/(brand)/Olympus/(appareil2)/695%7C0/(brand2)/Fujifilm

Cheers,

Rick

I ended up with an X100 and have used it on a few trips now. Overall it’s been a joy, but I’ll probably sell it for an X-E1 later this fall. Should be about the same size/wt as the X100 once the 27mm pancake is available, and it’ll be quite a bit more versatile than the X100 (plus a bump in IQ since it has the X pro sensor).

I have the X100 and it is wonderful. As someone who's owned a Canon 30D, T1i, T2i, used a 5D Mark II extensively, I really really love it. I like the constraint of a lack of zoom and find it improves my consideration of composition instead of simply zooming to fill the frame with whatever I'm photographing. Prime lenses make people a better photographer.

That said, my decision in picking the X100 over the E-M5 was that the X100 takes more "filmic" photos. The E-M5 takes very digital, perfect photos that lack the energy that the X100 photos seem to capture.

Sigma SD2M rather than either of these options(though I would go with the OMD-5 over the 100). You want Medium Format Quality, this cam has it according to Luminous Landscape who seems to be more of a photog effenete. Likewise, its user interface stinks. =) Same price too.

Kai, great reviews. Very helpful. I have an Oly e-620 that probably needs replacement as it is beginning to need repair. Since I have several lenses the EM-5 will probably be my next move. It was good to learn about the compatibility of the Canon L series, too. Thanks.