May 30, 2012 at 4:30 am #1290488
Sam SockwellBPL Member
Perusing a few JMT threads I hear this refrain about bear cannisters not needed below MTR(headed south of course) Is this true? Can one simply carry a bear container and mail it out at MTR? Or just take one instead of a couple each needing to carry one?
This is a crucial logistics question but I had not seen it in the books, or on the Yosemite conservancy info.
Thoughts? See you out there first two weeks August.
Sam.May 30, 2012 at 12:09 pm #1882390
Last year when looking into it I found this discussion on the Yahoo JMT group:
Basically, it's required in some sections, but not the section right after MTR so you can probably get away with a smaller canister.May 30, 2012 at 12:49 pm #1882399
Manfred KopischBPL Member
you don't need a bear canister for the 50+ miles south of MTR until Pinchot Pass. But bear canisters are required at Rae Lakes and at Mt. Whitney.
So shipping back your canister from MTR won't work. But at least you don't need to fit all your food into a canister for the first couple of nights after MTR.
Have fun out there,
ManfredMay 30, 2012 at 1:06 pm #1882405
Steven ParisBPL Member
@saparisorLocale: Pacific Northwest
I don't know if this map is still the accurate version of bear can requirements:
Assuming the map is accurate, you will need a canister after Bench Lake into Kings Canyon UNLESS you (a) rush through that area or (b) use existing campsites with bear lockers. Both those options seem . . . limiting.
As an aside, I know that all of us on BPL, who are either going to hike the JMT or have dreams to hike it someday, wish that we didn't have to carry bear canisters. The lower right corner of that map lists some reasons to carry a canister. No. 7 is "this is the single most effective thing you can as a backcountry visitor to protect Sierra black bears."May 30, 2012 at 1:44 pm #1882423
Bob BankheadBPL Member
@wandering_bobLocale: Oregon, USA
Just because they are not required in a given area does not mean they are not needed.
Remember, bears do not read maps; they just use their nose.
If it smells good, they will come.
YMMVMay 30, 2012 at 1:57 pm #1882433
I always take a bear can. Why? Because, at the end of a long day, I don't want to d!ck around trying to hang a food bag – especially above tree line.
Once you get used to the convenience of not having to deal with guarding your pack during rest stops, naps, fishing breaks, etc (marmots & rodents are sometimes worse than bears) ie just take out the can and put it aside, or even better, not needing to wake up to protect your stash during the night, the 2 lbs or so (I use a BV450) becomes practically inconsequential.
The trick is to find a pack that handles the can. Properly sized & configured, you shouldn't even know it's in your pack.May 30, 2012 at 2:22 pm #1882446
Sam SockwellBPL Member
for all the helpful responses, that makes it all clear. Thanks again to all Sam.Jun 1, 2012 at 2:05 am #1882925
I saw threads like you described, so i decided on a smaller can, the BV450. But I won't mail it home at my last resupply as you suggest, because it is needed again later on as others have posted here.
I'm hoping the the extra 2+ lbs for the BV will be offset by not having to carry so much water at any one time.
Have a nice trip.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.