I've narrowed down my new tent purchase to a solo+ or a twin. My considerations are… I'm 6'3" (read: need a longer option), I like going lightweight (stratospire is beautiful, but it's heavier than my purposes require, same with solong), I hate mosquitoes with a passion rarely rivaled (love the bug netting, don't see myself preferring flexibility of tarp + net-tent).
All this should make the Solo+ the clear choice. It says 1 person, it's a 1.5 person kind of deal, which by size I rightfully am… The only thing is that I read that it has the same footprint as the twin. So, at that point, there isn't a terrible amount of difference from what I see. The twin requires 2 poles/sticks (fine as if I'm bringing one pole I'm likely bringing 2), recommends 2 more stakes (.6 ounces'ish). Solo+ has 4 more inches of peak height (weird, right?). Twin lists a rear height (solo+ just doesn't list it). Twin with screen w/out beak option adds .3 ounces compared to the solo+.
With that slight difference, I feel like i may as well go with the twin with the idea that I can take the girlfriend along in it sometimes. I had planned on getting something else for this purpose (or more likely keeping my old heavy tent) on account of the lack of privacy/her dislike of meshy-creepy-crawly-bump-in-the-night factor of not being fully enclosed on the floor via a solid piece of material. At this weight difference/footprint-difference though, why bother getting a solo+? Am I right?
Is the beak worth it? I wish I could play with both options, but I have a hard time wrapping my head around this just in theory.
Also on a silly side note, anyone have any color recommendations? I've never owned cuben before. I'm both partial to the clear see through idea, and the blue.
Thanks for reading my nitpicky post. It's a lot of money to plop down, and I'd hate to do it twice.

