Topic

emergency whistle sounds just like a bird call …

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
James holden BPL Member
PostedMar 26, 2012 at 10:52 am

more at link

http://blog.oplopanax.ca/2012/03/the-fox-40-whistle-and-bird-calls/

However, starting about an hour before dawn on the south coast, there's a bird that begins to call that sounds just like a fox 40 whistle. In the SAR community (at least the local one in the lower mainland), we refer to that bird as "the Fox 40 Bird" because it drives us crazy. For that period of time just before dawn, it makes whistle blasts almost useless because every bird sounds like a distant subject blowing their whistle in return, except presumably the subject would be blowing more frantically.

PostedMar 26, 2012 at 12:45 pm

Interesting.

"except presumably the subject would be blowing more frantically. "

I don't know if I'd count on that! If you're sitting there, leg lodged under a rock or whatever your situation is, for hours and hours with no sign of help, my guess is you're meekly blowing the whistle every minute or so, and not at all frantically.

PostedMar 28, 2012 at 8:14 pm

I was once in a situation where I was hiking and heard what I soon found out was a whistle (from a sternum strap).

I distinctly remember thinking to myself: "What and interesting Birdcall, I should really start learning birdcalls".

PostedMar 29, 2012 at 6:56 am

I think this is a good reason why you should use the universal sign of distress: 3
I think three blasts on a whistle close together at regular intervals, would sound less "organic"?
Maybe the first set could get mistaken for a bird(s), but I think after a few rounds it would seem unnaturally consistent to most people, especially SAR.

Steven Hanlon BPL Member
PostedMar 29, 2012 at 7:37 am

yes, 3 blasts (not SOS) is how the Boy Scouts are taught and it is what i listen for. SOS in Morse code would be (dit dit dit) (dah dah dah) (dit dit dit), 3 blasts is much quicker and easier esp. in an excited state.

Steve, WM3O

Barry Cuthbert BPL Member
PostedMar 29, 2012 at 1:26 pm

A youth SAR group in New Zealand did some testing on whistles to determine which were the best (and worst) in dense New Zealand bush. Some interesting results were noted. The Storm Whistle followed by the Acme Thunderer were best with an audible range out to 400m (1/4 mile), yelling and screaming were just as effective if only for short periods, the Fox 40 whistle was good for 238m. The link below as more results and the methodlogy used.

http://www.ysar.org.nz/technology/Testing.htm

PostedMar 29, 2012 at 2:07 pm

It makes sense that a complex waveform with many harmonics and tonal variations (human voice) would be much better-suited to being heard through / around acoustic impediments such as trees, than a single high-frequency blast (a whistle), which is very directional and more quickly absorbed by any material in the way.

Stephen Barber BPL Member
PostedMar 29, 2012 at 2:33 pm

I got a couple of the Storm whistles after reading about this test – man, they are big! The Fox 40 tucks neatly into a t-shirt; the Storm is a huge big thing! I've yet to actually take it along!

PostedMar 30, 2012 at 9:30 am

Just wait until this bird learns all of the different whistle models!

Youtube video

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Loading...