Topic

Sawyer 3-Way Inline vs Squeeze?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 19 posts - 26 through 44 (of 44 total)
PostedFeb 25, 2012 at 1:20 pm

I’m still considering various Sawyer options.

The filter and big zip arrived. The filter is running about 2.9 ounces on my scale and the big zip says it weighs 5.7 ounces. That’s 8.6 ounces total which is only a couple ounces less than my current system (pump filter plus a 2 ounce dirty water bucket). Not a lot of difference.

Here’s another Sawyer option that appeals to me.

here

I called Sawyer and they said this filter weighs about 4 ounces. If I connect it to my 2 ounce bucket then I’m up to about 7 ounces total (2 ounce bucket, 4 ounce filter and, say, 1 ounce for hose).

When I backpack on the Olympic Park Wilderness Beach in Washington I already carry a 5 gallon bucket for bear food hanging. (it is allowed there) So, in that case I could mount the filter on the bear bucket.

Does anyone have experience with this bucket mounted Sawyer(or other brand) filter?

The 2 ounce Sawyer filter referred to in the posts doesn’t seem to be available anymore. Perhaps the quick release fittings added to the newer filter accounts for the weight difference?

PostedFeb 25, 2012 at 4:08 pm

John,

“Please let us know what you finally decide on”

I think I’ve decided on the Squeeze. Just odered one here:

here

Daryl

PostedFeb 25, 2012 at 4:45 pm

I had a couple 3 way inlines and both of them eventually became very hard to get water through, which is a bummer when getting water through your platy water tube is labored …… This occurred even with backwashing using very clean water, not muddy or silty water …. eventually I gave up on them, but they seem to be working for others ….

PostedFeb 25, 2012 at 6:20 pm

Not sure if any of you are still thinking of possibilities, but here's one I've concocted for when I want to carry a filter on shorter trips, especially if with a group, and if I've decided to take my Platypus soft bottle with hose. This one is just a gravity filter; I haven't tried to use it in-line for sucking water through. It just happened to work with the resources I had readily available.

Take a look at the Platypus "Gravityworks" filter system.
http://cascadedesigns.com/platypus/filtration-and-storage/gravityworks-filter/product
It uses heavy Platy bags and it's expensive.

But, the filter itself is the same basic weight as all the others discussed here: mine weighs in at a bit under 2oz dry, a bit under 4oz wet. Good to .2 microns. Where I live in Canada, the MEC store has it for just over $40, which is about what we'd pay here to have one of the other slightly cheaper ones shipped, and have to wait forever for it to arrive in the mail. Perhaps one could use the platypus Cleanstream filter cartridge as well, if that's all that's available. Many of the others are not always readily available here.

I had an extra Platy tube + connectors laying around that I'd found at a discount store.
For the "dirty" bag, I substituted a large-size Ziploc, which weighs 13 grams and holds up to 4 liters. I snipped off a tiny piece of one of the lower corners.
I cut off the top of a water/soda bottle compatible with the Platypus screwcaps, put it into the bag, with the bottle neck gently pushed into the corner that was cut off, so that the open neck corresponds with the hole. (it should not go through the hole, however.)
I took my spare platy hose that screws onto a platy bottle, and cut the hose about 6 inches below the screw-on assemblage. This piece weighs about 11 grams.
I then screw on that bit of hose to the bottle neck, with the bag in the middle of them, held secure by them, if that makes sense. The water in the bag goes through the hole, down the hose. I can further secure the bottle-neck inside the bag by putting a rubber band or two around narrower parts of the neck where it will hold pretty well without cutting through the bag.

The Ziploc assemblage now functions as the "dirty" bag: You can (carefully) scoop up water with it and then close it, just like with the zip opening of the "dirty" bag. I can stop and start water flow with the little piece already used for that on my platypus that I'm already bringing.

I then stick the "dirty" end of the Gravityworks filter cartridge into the open end of the bit of tube, just as you'd stick it into the bit of tube coming out of the original "dirty" bag in the actual Gravityworks system.

Onto the "clean" end of the filter, I stick the end of my own platy hose with the mouthpiece temporarily removed. (Taking the mouthpiece/filter on and off is easy enough with my newer, "squishy" platy hose, but a bit more cumbersome with the older, firmer style.) The water would now go through the filter and into my platypus, or into the platypus or compatible water bottle of others in my group.

To get the "dirty" bag higher than the clean one for the gravity effect, gently wrap it in bandanna/clothing or something protective, and place it securely on a rock or soft log, etc. Or, bring a plastic grocery bag with a tiny hole in the bottom of it, and place the filled ziploc "dirty" bag in this bag with the hose sticking through the hole, then hang it with the grocery bag handles. You can multi-use the grocery bag(s) to store/organize something else in your pack if you want.

This system can work fine for a group, and filters much faster than those fancy pump filters my hiking buddies lug around.

If I'm already bringing my platypus and hose (or if someone else is), the rest of the assemblage weighs a bit over 3oz dry, and around 5oz when the filter is wet. If I'm hiking with someone whose a quick-disconnect style platypus, I may bring another snipped-off bit of hose with quick-disconnect end, weighing around .5oz, so they can filter directly to their platy without fussing with taking their mouthpiece off. And if sharing the weight of this filter system with one or two other people, you're each carrying only a couple ounces.

I specified "shorter trips" above, because obviously, the ziploc dirty bag setup is not as durable as the full-on Gravityworks system. You can tinker with ways to make it more durable. Sometimes I'm already carrying some food in another same-size Ziploc, and this would be my spare if the first one gets punctured. Or, I can just bring a spare Ziploc at a half-ounce penalty and use it to store clean water around camp. I bring some purification tabs as well, just in case.

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 7:15 am

Trace,

Do you have a rough idea of how many gallons were filtered before the filter became hard to use?

Daryl

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 8:55 am

Daryl,

"…I think I've decided on the Squeeze. Just odered one here:…"

Thanks! I've seen several folks with this over the last year, and they all seemed very happy with it. The only downside I've heard of is that the rubber o-ring on the inside of the filter where it screws onto the dirty bag is slightly too small and sometimes falls out, so it might be worth keeping an eye on that.

Otherwise, I think you'll be happy with that one.

–John

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 9:05 am

REI just posted the Squeeze days after getting my 3-Way. Trying to decide what to do. I wanted the squeeze all along, but the 3-way is pretty cool.

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 10:07 am

Daryl: Great question …. hard to remember, both were probably about 10 to 20 liters, so not much … I'm not seeing others with the same issue, so unless a bunch of people popped up with the same issue, I would probably give it a shot, if the roles were reversed …. who knows, could have been a fluke …. also, one other consideration to keep in mind is that these are summer filters, due to how they filter using tubular filaments of some sort, they can't go below freezing or the little tube / filament things can crack …. the instructions mention this as well, so just one consideration I haven't heard anyone else mention to keep in mind ….

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 10:19 am

No experience whatsoever, but just reading your posts… Am I right in my understanding that the Sawyer filter will do the following:

o treat bacteria
o treat protozoa
o clarify water

But NOT the following:

o treat viruses
o improve water taste

And sucking can quickly become difficult? I am especially curious about this last point. Is it a common experience with other actual users? Is the sucking difficult because priming is required? Or is sucking difficult because the filter clogs easily?

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 10:23 am

Ben: I seem to be the only person reporting issues with water flow so far, but this is not related to priming. I believe the manual instructs you to prime before you go out, but I tested to be sure I could prime if necessary in the field and didn't have any issues …. it just takes a bit more effort to get water moving unprimed and then once it is primed you're good to go …. I believe your other points are correct …

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 10:45 am

Thanks, Trace. Good to know one can prime in the field — where the force of a faucet is often unattainable. The altogether different product — the Sawyer purifier — suffers from this great defect — where priming with a faucet prior to each trip is a must.

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 11:11 am

Trace,

Good reminder on the freezing problem. I typically leave my filter out at night when camping. Must change that habit as it is often freezing at night when I'm backpacking.

Daryl

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 11:24 am

Ben,

Thanks for the REI tip. I cancelled my Bass Pro order and ordered the Squeeze from REI. The REI package includes a larger bag, which I prefer.

Daryl

PostedFeb 26, 2012 at 11:31 am

Ben,

Here's what Sawyer says on their website:

"Biological Filtration: removes 7 log (99.99999%) of all bacteria like salmonella, cholera, and E. coli. And 6 log (99.9999%) of all Protozoa such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium. You will find these removal rates to equal or exceed competitive options. EPA guidelines allow ten times more Protozoa left in the water than we allow."

Daryl

PostedFeb 27, 2012 at 8:47 am

Ben,

Here are some more words from Sawyer website:

"This Filter Removes:

Bacteria, Which Cause:

I.E.: Cholera, Botulism (Clostridum botulinum), Typhoid (Salmonella typhi), Amoebic Dysentery, E. Coli, Coliform Bacteria, Streptococcus, Salmonella

Protozoan (Cyst):

I.E.: Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora"

For me, hiking in the mountains of the Pacifc Northwest, I think this covers everything. If I recall correctly, you say that you typically chemically treat, wait a half hour and then filter. If using this filter would you skip the chemical treatment step given these claims?

Daryl

John S. BPL Member
PostedFeb 27, 2012 at 10:41 am

Ben is covering for viruses with the chemical treatment first.

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedFeb 27, 2012 at 10:57 am

Daryl:

John took the words right out of my mouth! There's a lot of subjectivity here. Remember, some folks never treat their water and never get sick either. OTOH, for me, I just don't want to "guess" whether a water source has only bacteria, or both bacteria and protozoa, or viruses might be present too. So, for me, I'd rather just find the simplest, lightest, most compact system that will "treat them all".

In the case of the Sawyer 3-Way — as John replied — it does NOT protect from viruses. Also, it does NOT do anything to improve water taste (no carbon/charcoal core). If neither is a concern, then the Sawyer can be a great option. But for those who want these two potential issues taken care of as well should look elsewhere.

PostedMar 1, 2012 at 8:13 pm

The Sawyer bottle is back in stock at Walmart, if anyone is looking to pick up a filter for a MYOG system.

Viewing 19 posts - 26 through 44 (of 44 total)
Loading...