Topic

Bear Canister in a Front Pack


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Bear Canister in a Front Pack

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1278559
    Larry De La Briandais
    BPL Member

    @hitech

    Locale: SF Bay Area

    Has anyone considered making a “front pack” style attachment to carry a bear canister in areas they are required? It seems to me this would be a very good solution. It would allow one to use a smaller main pack that should more than make up for the extra weight of the “front pack” (not including the weight of the bear canister, of course).

    I’m thinking of giving this a try. Any thoughts?

    #1773191
    Jason William
    Member

    @jdubs

    Locale: South SF Bay Area

    Don't see why not. The size/shape of the thing might be an issue (protrudes out, awkward round curve pressed against your chest?), but weight wise I think you're right on point. If we can carry a DSLR+lenses in a front camera case comfortably, no reason a bear canister shouldn't work in that same spot.

    #1773192
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    The problem with a large front pack like you suggest is that it blocks your view of your feet, and this may lead to stumbling. At least it does for me.

    –B.G.–

    #1773300
    ROBERT TANGEN
    Spectator

    @robertm2s

    Locale: Lake Tahoe

    I agree with Bob Gross about front packs' tendency to cause stumbling. The only exception is when skiing, I for one look out further than when hiking, and don't mind a front pack as much.

    #1773336
    Rodney OndaRock
    Member

    @rodneyondarock

    Locale: Southern California

    Gets in the way of peeing, as well as the forward lean hunch when climbing steep uphill

    Already have a beer belly, no room for a second barrel

    #1773431
    Larry De La Briandais
    BPL Member

    @hitech

    Locale: SF Bay Area

    This is the inspiration for this idea.

    It seems like there is a following for front packs (they are not the only ones to make one). Just seems like the bear canister would be a logical choice to put somewhere other than in your pack.

    I hadn't thought about not being able to see your feet. I do look down a lot when hiking, but I don't know if it would bother me or not if I could not see my feet.

    #1773584
    Ken K
    Member

    @thefatboy

    Locale: St. Louis

    Another thought… In addition to the increased tendency to stumble, if you DO fall forward, you put that hard shell right into your gut/ribs. A front pack with semi-soft, conforming load is probably a better thought.

    #1773642
    Larry De La Briandais
    BPL Member

    @hitech

    Locale: SF Bay Area

    Okay, so no one thinks this is a good idea. I guess a front pack with other "stuff" and the bear canister in the pack is a better idea.

    Well, that is why I asked…

    #1773663
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    Front packs are hot— that ends up being a lot of insulation and blocked ventilation. Might be nice with a 20F/10MPH breeze in your face, but no so much after 2000 feet of switchbacks in August.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...