Topic
Pack pocket 3/4 ridgerest
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Pack pocket 3/4 ridgerest
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 30, 2011 at 5:22 pm #1277433
Does anyone know of a pack that will hold a 3/4 length ridgerest in the pad pocket?
Jul 30, 2011 at 5:45 pm #1764739yes, the starlite holds it perfect. It does not need to be scored and folded or any such nonsense, just loosely roll it in the same width as the pocket and shove it in. Below 20-22 lbs it is amazingly comfortable and a great combination.
Above 20 lbs, when I tried the starlite I had no problem with the pack at any weight, It was not a pack buckling issue , rather I found that the weight would not stay off my shoulders above 25 lbs. I could adjust the pack and walk around, and over the next few min the weight would just drop onto my shoulders. The belt-to-pack connection began sagging at 30 lbs, and the belt did not grip my hips well and the belt slid down too in the back. It was unuseable on me at 35 lbs.
I tried the circuit and found it could carry 40+ lbs rock solid. I use 2 GG torso pads inside for support (5.3 oz vs. 9 oz for ridgerest)even with no stay. Better belt that doesnt slip on my hips, and better pack/belt connection with velcro on both sides of the belt, and more velcro area (wider belt) It seems strange since the belt is not stiffer than the starlites, but it doesnt begin to sag and collapse where it is attached, and the starlites belt actually was buckling at top of connection at 35 lbs.
Jul 30, 2011 at 5:47 pm #1764740I assume if that works with the starlite then the swift will work too?
Jul 30, 2011 at 6:01 pm #1764744Both the Traveler and the Starlight will hold 3/4 Ridgerest pads in their external pad pockets.
Our Travelers also hold a deflated 20×66 inch Thermarest Prolite Plus.
Jul 30, 2011 at 6:08 pm #1764747The ULA Ohm has elastic straps inside the pack that hold a 3/4 Ridgerest folded in forths. I really like the Ohm, very functional, and the service from ULA was outstanding.
Jul 30, 2011 at 6:20 pm #1764748It will fit into a Swift too.
Jul 30, 2011 at 8:26 pm #1764781Awesome, because the two packs that I am still debating on and changing my mind about each day is between the ULA Ohm and the SMD swift. Thanks for sharing your experiences.
Jul 30, 2011 at 9:55 pm #1764800Casey,
Get the Ohm.
Torso length pads or 3/4 length sleeping pads folded into 1/3rds are easily slipped under the elastic pad straps inside the Ohm-makes for a very stable load. Between the delrin hoop, sleeping pad 'framesheet', and load lifters, the Ohm carries loads like butter.
Jul 30, 2011 at 10:19 pm #1764803both are good packs. Highly recommend trying out whatever you choose with max weight first and returning if find it doesnt work.
From ULA website: The OHM
Is your load weight almost always under 22#s and you are willing to suffer mightily if you get up to 25 or 30#s?
You are also aware of the fact that this pack has no back padding to speak of, a smaller waist belt, and that the belt and shoulder straps are fixed, ie, no adjustment possible.
If all the above fits you, then you may want to consider the Ohm Backpack, but not until you come up with a good reason not to spend the extra $25 and get a Circuit Backpack. If you are hiking the PCT or the AT or the JMT this is probably not the pack for you, even though the light weight is very tempting.
If you have a lot of experience or are a total gram weenie and plan to be at the head of the pack then the Ohm Backpack might just work for you.
Jul 31, 2011 at 9:52 pm #1765064Any ULA circuit owners out there? I was curious how you pack a foam sleeping pad? I didn't see anywhere about the circuit having a pad pocket.
Aug 1, 2011 at 8:27 am #1765117"I didn't see anywhere about the circuit having a pad pocket."
Read Eugene's post above, extrapolate to the Circuit.Ohm…….23 ounces
Circuit…..36 ounces (~300 ci bigger, external fixed backpad)Same Suspension.
Aug 1, 2011 at 8:33 am #1765118Greg, doesn't the Circuit also have a single vertical aluminum stay that the Ohm does not?
Also, if the circuit suspension is anything like the catalyst suspension, then both should have a very rigid foam sheet
I also do not believe that the circuit has a pad pocket for your own inflatable mat
Aug 1, 2011 at 8:55 am #1765125Casey,
Chris at ULA is very helpful, send him an email or give them a call.
I have the Ohm, have only had it out a few times on 1 and 2 night trips. The straps inside hold the 3/4 Ridgerest well, I stuff the quilt in the bottom, then shelter (in an over sized stuff sack), and have plenty of room, I have not come close to filling the extension collar with three season clothing. I think the Bear Vault 450 will fit in there as well. I like the mesh outside pocket for rain gear, etc. The best part are the side pockets which are huge and can be reached easily. I went with a large hipbelt even though I only have a 32" waist, it warps around better and the hipbelt pockets are huge on it.
It may be a little small for longer trips or colder weather, it just depends on your what you are going to use it for.
You could order both the Ohm and Circuit then send one back.Eric
Aug 1, 2011 at 9:16 am #1765131Konrad –
"Greg, doesn't the Circuit also have a single vertical aluminum stay that the Ohm does not?"
You may be right, but the ULA website states on the Circuit –
"…It still utilizes a 1.2 oz carbon fiber and delrin suspension hoop in conjunction with a dense internal foam frame…"
Aug 1, 2011 at 9:59 am #1765146I'm just trying to get some insight about three packs, swift, ohm and circuit for a PCT through hike next year. My base weight is at 11 lbs (with with ohm on my spreadsheet) and I am looking at probably going down to as low as 10 lbs. I think my gear will fit easily in all of these packs. My only concern is being able to carry lots and lots of food and water. And I would also like this pack to do more than just a through hike I would like it for weekend trips as well. I've been debating on what pack to get for a couple of weeks now and I change my mind several times throughout the day. I looked at some other packs as well but I think the three I mentioned will work best for me. Now I just got paid and I need to buy a pack so I can use it for the summer and replace my 4 pound pack.
The reason I was curious about the circuit having a pad pocket is because I use a 3/4 length ridgerest foam pad and I don't want to strap it on the outside.
And a little bit about my setup.
I use a bivy with a poncho tarp. (no other rain gear)I would have to say besides the current pack I have now the heaviest item I have is my Marmot Pinnacle 15 degree sleeping bag. It can take up a lot of volume if I don't have it in the stuff sack. I am assuming though if I go with the ohm I may have to put it in the stuff sack if I want to carry 7-10 days worth of food.What do you guys think I should get. I only have money for one pack and don't want to waste money on shipping packs back.
Aug 1, 2011 at 10:21 am #1765160Check out this link:
http://www.ula-equipment.com/buying-the-right-ula-backpack-for-your-adventure.asp
You might get some ideas from the current SOTM pack articles as well.
Aug 1, 2011 at 4:29 pm #1765281AnonymousInactive"Greg, doesn't the Circuit also have a single vertical aluminum stay that the Ohm does not?"
The newer model of the Circuit definitely has the aluminum stay. I personally removed and replaced one in its sleeve on a friend's pack about a week ago to demo for him the how and where of it.
Edited for spelling
Aug 1, 2011 at 6:32 pm #1765346Yes the circuit has a removeable aluminum 2 oz stay right in the center of the back. The carbon fiber/delrin stay is removeable as well.(carbon rods on sides, plastic hoop across top)
There are 2 foam layers (high density and lower density) in the backpanel so that the Aluminum stay doesnt press into your back, and to prevent other hard items in the pack from digging into your back.
You can use the circuit without a pad for additional support/cushioning because of foam backpanel and carbon fiber stays. When you exceed some weight, depending on how its packed, the backpanel might buckle, hence the newer al stay they added.
There is no specific place inside to put a pad. Just put it in. I fold mine and put against my back. Then wedge by sleeping bag into the bottom, which creates the rounded shape at bottom and holds the pad in place against my back.
With the pad inside, there is no need for the Al stay (2oz) or foam layers in the backpanel (2oz). If stayed under 20 and packed right, probably could take the carbon fiber stays out too, but I havent tried that.
I like 2 GG torsolites together to give full length. I have the pad run that was only 2.6oz each so my pad weighs 5.2 oz. With pad inside it takes up probably half the pack, but still room for 5 days food or so. Put in Al stay and the foam backpanel , and strap pad to back or top, and could carry 10 days food.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.