Jul 28, 2011 at 3:56 pm #1277355
I'm hiking the JMT this september and my major goal is to fish as much as possible. With that in mind, I'm strongly considering taking along a sandal or shoe I can wet wade in so I can access much more of the rivers and creeks along the route. My current pair of wading sandals weighs 28 oz. Obviously a balancing act between lightness and enough structure for support, traction, protection. Anyone else thought about this trade off and have ideas?Jul 28, 2011 at 9:08 pm #1764231
I have not found anything that works better than my hiking shoes (merrill moab ventillators) that I would dare to carry.I take it you try to keep your footware dry?Jul 29, 2011 at 5:51 am #1764292
Craig PriceBPL Member
@skeetsLocale: Melbourne, Australia
salomon tech amphibians
Columbia outpost hybrid
many others also out there
cheapsters – dunlop volleys, the original – roofers still wear them
light weight mesh runner-style shoes with specialised rubber on the soles for river use. Less slippery than ordinary runners, whose harder sole rubber is really slippery. No rubber is perfect, but these are better than ordinary. Ok to walk in, but with softer soles will wear out sooner.
CraigJul 29, 2011 at 8:57 am #1764337
Yes I need a 2nd pair of shoes because I find that if I hike after I'm in the water for a few hours, my feet get really chewed up.
Thanks for the suggestions
THe solomon tech amphibians are 24 oz
the columbia outpost hybrid is 20 oz
Merrell WaterPro Manistee Water Shoe are 22 oz
In regards to the lightweight runner style shoes are you referring to products like the
merrell glove cross trainers – they weight in at 13-14 oz for the pair. I tried them on and seem like they would be good in terms of the sole and grip, there is little stability and no front toe protection. So you'd need to be pretty careful when wading.
Maybe I can get creative with a knife and cut a bit off my current pair of sandals to reduce weight from the current 28 oz…..Aug 21, 2011 at 5:41 am #1771553
Craig PriceBPL Member
@skeetsLocale: Melbourne, Australia
I missed this, sorry.
if you are carrying a second pair of shoes, then there are other options to consider. as a suggestion:
modifying a rubber soled pair will be lightest. it's such a pity that the rubber in crocs is more slippery than ice on wet river rocks.
cheapest is grabbing your lightest cheap shoe/sandal, cutting off any frills, then glueing on some thin waterproof carpet, the thinnest grade stuff to reduce wet weight. works pretty well for wading, but you need something else for hiking. if you use something with a purely rubber upper, it will do as a camp shoe also.
just suggesting…Aug 21, 2011 at 9:32 am #1771596
Yuri RBPL Member
Question: I assume that the water will be plenty cold, as there still some snow on trails…how long do you think you can stand in sandals in cold water? Wouldn't you need something that is water-proof and wear some socks inside?Aug 25, 2011 at 1:02 pm #1772794
I find that most of the time, I can take a break on a rock or the bank to keep my feet happy even in the coldest water. For me a wading shoe needs to do 3 main things 1. protect your front toes 2. improve traction and protect soles of feet (as opposed to bare ft) 3. keep your socks and hiking shoes relatively dry to minimize blisters/skin breakdown, etc.Aug 27, 2011 at 10:05 am #1773443
@hellbillylarryLocale: southern appalachians
I would advise against a second pair of shoes. You'll be crossing water alot on that trail weather you plan on fishing or not. I'd just wear my regular hiking shoes and tromp on through. My Solomon xa pros and xt wings will both dry within an hour or so of hiking in them.
You need to learn to handle hiking with wet feet if you are going to do any long distance hiking.Aug 27, 2011 at 10:40 am #1773453
Just got my shoes, but after some tries, I think Columbia Drainmakers are really good for getting feet wet. My feet dry much faster than an hour.
Check out the video:
Don't know what they are like when you get snow, other than that, they seem really nice.
Light? Enough for me. Weight: one shoe, Size 9, 8.85oz/251g
"You need to learn to handle hiking with wet feet if you are going to do any long distance hiking."
An the original poster said "major goal is to fish as much as possible." –> not so long distances, right?Sep 23, 2011 at 8:18 pm #1782880
Antti – those look very interesting for 17 oz a pair it may be a great compromise.
Just got back from through fishing the JMT south to north and decided not to bring any additional footwear on my trip. I initially waded in my hiking shoes for the first 2 days. Soon developed serious raw region over achilles tendons that were very painful requiring significant taping. afterwards, I either waded in socks to the other side of the creek to improve my cast line (fly fishing) or just stayed on the edge and walked up or down stream until I found a clear casting lane. In retrospect, there were only a few creeks/rivers on which, wading shoes would have been really nice (Woods Creek, middle and north fork of the San Joaquin, Mono Creek and Merced River). However, when fishing those creeks and rivers, I simply used my socks alone or bare feet. Not ideal, at times a bit uncomfortable but nothing compared to my torn up heels. If I did it again, I'd probably bring a light 5 fingers or simple beach/sand shoe for protection. maybe even a thicker sock with a bit of shoe goo on the bottom, hmmm.Sep 23, 2011 at 9:12 pm #1782905
Roleigh MartinBPL Member
@marti124Locale: Moderator-JohnMuirTrail Yahoo Group
I've done the JMT every summer for the last 4 years and I like the Crocs' knock offs as they're totally functional (if you get the firmest/tightest size for your feet), you may need to order two sizes, try them out, and send back the size that's not right.
Waldies.net has a crocs knockoff called the AT Walker or something AT in the name, that is about 4 oz per sandal.
Walmart used to sell knockoffs Crocs and I used those this summer.
By the way, shameful plug here. I'm the moderator of the JohnMuirTrail@YahooGroups.com and we have 1240 members and the best research library on the JMT period. There is a whole document in the file library on JMT wading sandals options, some of them going down to about 1.5 oz per sandal (which I've used, but I've decided the extra 2.5 to 3 oz more per foot is worth it totally). If you haven't joined that group, I encourage you to do so. The best single file we have in the crib sheet for the JMT (prints out on one sheet of paper) that has all the phone numbers you'd ever conceivably need while on the trail (in case you have to bail out or get an unexpected resupply, etc).Sep 24, 2011 at 12:26 am #1782932
Besides me falling in a lake i kept my shoes dry on the jmt by using my dirty socks to cross then putting on my backup socks and stringing the wet ones on my pack. After I take the socks off I clean them up a bit so it's productive anyway. If you cross another one, put the wet ones back on for the crossing. As far as toe stubs I didn't have a problem but I wasn't trying to fish. This is just what works for me. I still got very minor blisters but not painful while on the trail. I've had worse from day hikes in wet shoes.Sep 24, 2011 at 12:42 am #1782933
Diana VannBPL Member
Thanks for the tip about the JMT group, it sounds very helpful. I haven't hiked the JMT, but it's high on my list of next hikes.Sep 24, 2011 at 7:29 am #1782982
Jerry AdamsBPL Member
@retiredjerryLocale: Oregon and Washington
some day maybe I'll do JMTOct 6, 2011 at 7:00 pm #1787549
@mxracer33xLocale: West Coast
WHat about a pair of crocs Quicktrails? I have no idea on weight, since I cant find one anywhere, but Im planning on calling tomorrow. These look just like what Ive been looking for for some of the areas I fish.Oct 10, 2011 at 8:56 pm #1789002
I've been using Columbia Drainmaker water shoes.
19.2 ounces for a pair in size 11.
Traction isn't great, but is adequate, and they dry out quickly.Apr 16, 2012 at 3:52 pm #1867850
Vivobarefoot ultras. I wear a size 13 and they're 7.9 oz for the pair on my scale. That's with the removable tongues removed. They're super comfortable; I think they're the same material as crocs but much thinner. Ems sells a pair for 50Apr 16, 2012 at 6:12 pm #1867921
@richardcullipLocale: San Diego County
I both hike and wet wade while fly fishing in my Innov8 Roclite 295's to avoid the weight of carrying a second pair of shoes. The rubber soles are soft and sticky and do a decent job of sticking to wet rocks while wading. The mesh top drains wells and dries quickly. The only downside I've experienced is that they don't keep my feet warm while wading in cold water. This limits the time I can keep my feet under water when wading ice cold streams/creeks before the cold drives me out of the water.Apr 17, 2012 at 11:38 pm #1868452
@jlrrayLocale: Pacific Southwest
You can get yourself a lightweight pair or wet wading socks which might make it more comfortable to wade in, but when wading in cold water for long periods of time, i usually throw on some neoprene guard socks on and away I go. kinda tough to keep adding things when you're trying to pack light, but for me, the whole point of going backpacking is fishing…Apr 29, 2012 at 11:17 am #1872435
Dan MagdoffBPL Member
@highsierraguyLocale: Northern California
for water/ fishing shoes I use the Northface hedgefrogs. They are 21oz on my scale, and work great! Quick drying, closed toed, and can be drawn tight so that you can hike quite a ways in them and have good traction.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.