Topic
Watchful Eye (poor) Designs
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Watchful Eye (poor) Designs
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 26, 2006 at 4:53 pm #1220408
Has anybody else failed to see that the emperor was naked, in fact. I’m of course talking about the ALOSAK/OP SAKs sold on this sight $6+ cost for three plastic bags. Mine have all aquired holes with about one week on the trail. Has anyone else had a similar experience, or what?
Nov 26, 2006 at 5:31 pm #1368424The OP Saks aren’t very durable. A partial solution is to keep the OP Saks inside silnylon stuff sacks inside your pack. The regular (non-OP) Alosaks are much more durable.
Nov 26, 2006 at 7:27 pm #1368432Joseph, I agree, and would even expand on your point. I bought many aloksaks due to marketing buzz, but after three critical failures of properly sealed sacks (video camera, wallet, etc..), I don’t use them for water resistant storage. The dual-zipper freezer style ziplocks are much better (and cheap). The Watchfulleye designs have been stagnant, ziplock is always improving their product to stay competitive and keep those housewives happy. If you want proof, compare the size, diameter, and tactile feedback of the ziplock slide-lock side by side with a Watchfuleye bag. Water-resistant storage is one thing, but I dont know if ziplocs will take boiling water; maybe the W.E. is the only choice there..
Nov 26, 2006 at 7:37 pm #1368433Joseph,
What are you using the OP Saks for? As Dondo mentioned, the OP saks are not meant for waterproof gear storage, they’re meant for odor-proof food storage.
Nov 26, 2006 at 8:00 pm #1368435I keep my gossamer thinlite pad wrapped around the OP sak.
Another big problem with the OP sack is that they are designed to carry food, but if you get the smallest amount of food or whatever in the seal, your out of luck unless you give up your toothbrush to clean it.
I have resort to keeping my food in small zipplock bags inside the OP bags. That way I don’t need to take the sak out of my backpack, (no punctures).
Nov 26, 2006 at 8:48 pm #1368442The ziplocks most certainly do take boiling water without failure, at least one time. I will pack a meal, pour boiling water into the bag and then roll it up when I’m finished, no dishes to clean.
Nov 27, 2006 at 5:05 am #1368464The Target brand quart size freezer bags also work well for boil-in-bag meals and are very inexpensive.
Nov 27, 2006 at 11:27 am #1368498I’ve used two of these for food bags all last season. No failures in 100+ days of hiking.
They are well-protected in the pack (surrounded by a sleeping pad, tarp, and sleepingbag above). I keep my lunch for the day in a separate ziplock so I don’t need to go fishing in them until I get to camp in the evening.
I think it is also much, much better to underfill them.
Nov 27, 2006 at 1:21 pm #1368503I find the OP sacks tend to get small punctures easily, and need to be taped to stay OP (to their credit, they really are, unlike any other bag I’ve used). The regular bags are certainly tougher, but I still have had some zip locks delaminate on them.
All in all, a mixed bag (sorry).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.