Topic

Deciding between BearPaw Cub Den 1.5, Zpacks Hexamid (I chose Cub Den, here are the pics and initial setup)

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 47 total)
Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 18, 2011 at 7:00 pm

**** I no longer pitch the shelter with the hiking pole inside the shelter. I pitch it outside…much easier, more stable, more interior room. ****

I had been searching for a shelter and rain jacket setup to replace my GoLite Poncho/Tarp (10.44 oz) and my Montane Featherlite Smock (4.16 oz sized L). I was lucky to not get wet with this small tarp setup (did not carry a bivy) and I wanted something lighter if possible and better rain coverage if windy.

I have never carried a bivy and was not willing to carry one for fear of added heat in the summer or restriction as a tumbling side/stomach sleeper with quilt. I also wanted my entire shelter bug free instead of just my bivy/head area for comfort reasons.

So it came down to two Cuben Fiber (.51 oz) shelters:

– Zpacks Hexamid (quoted weights):
http://www.zpacks.com/shelter/hexamid.shtml

7.45 tent (basically addition of bug netting to tarp)
+ 0.25 oz seam sealer
+ 0.9 oz extended beak
= 8.6 oz for just the tent w/ extended beak w/out any guy lines or Line Lock 3s.
$345

Basic area of foot print: 108in x 30in = 3240 in2

http://www.zpacks.com/large_image.shtml?shelter/hexamid/hexamid_profile_front_l.jpg

vs.

– Bear Paw Cub Den 1.5 (measured weights):
http://www.bearpawwd.com/tents_tarps/cubden.html

11.07 tent w/ line locks & webbing, bug netting and NO extended beak (taped/bonded, no seam sealing needed)
-0.37 subtracting Line Lock 3s & webbing (8 of them on shelter x 0.046 oz. weight quote sourced from Zpacks.com actually)
= 10.70 oz for just the tent w/ out any guy lines or Line Lock 3s.
$225

Basic area of foot print: 100in x 38in = 3800 in2
http://www.bearpawwd.com/tents_tarps/tent_images/cubden/dcubden1_Dim.jpg

So a difference of 2.1 oz between shelters.

(The included guy lines weigh .9 oz and CF stuff sack weighs .2 oz)

The Zpacks is pitched 6 in off the ground in their blueprint by default where as the Cub Den 1.5 is shown pitched to the ground in their's so it's not really a fair comparison (as you generally will pitch the Cub Den 1.5 off the ground as well unless it's storming). The BearPaw has more area under the tarp and is significantly taller. This is where the extra weight in materials comes in. Plus, I did not need a full bug net floor in the Hexamid, only perimeter to keep bugs out, my Polycro ground sheet does the rest.

I picked the Bear Paw 1.5 for the following reasons:

– Good reviews on workmanship.
– Could get the shelter quickly (Ordered on 5/4, delivered on 5/18).
– Don't (hopefully) need bivy (extra heat and not sure how I'd react as I toss and turn) or extended beak (potential condensation problems) because Cub Den 1.5 shelter is bigger than Hexamid and can be pitched directly to ground in inclement weather with more room to shift to the back of the shelter in driving rain.
– Significantly cheaper than Hexamid ($120 difference.)
– Taped/bonded seams should hopefully be stronger and not separate with use over time.
– Could squeeze my GF in if she every decides to move on from car camping. :p (2 x Cascade Design NeoAir Shorts = 40 in wide)

*Of note. I had to go for the slightly heavier GG LT4S hiking poles vs. the TiGoat adjustable poles because they did not allow enough height when pitching this shelter for me personally.

Based on weight and perceived coverage from the elements (just received the shelter today and have not tried it out) I gave this product a 4.

I did not give a rating of 5 because I was not able to obtain the average weights of the different parts/options on the shelter when I purchased the item. That was somewhat frustrating and a leap of faith for a gram weenie like me, but it looks like the manufacturer has changed their website to break it down a little better with average weights of components. The manufacturer was nice enough to spend time with me on the phone and let me know when the item shipped. I also appreciated the manufacturers willingness to customize the shelter to my needs (I opted for a vertical zipper for the bug netting to save weight at the expense of a little more difficult to get in and out.)

Here are the pictures of the shelter in my office today as I received it (looks to me in fine condition even though USPS beat the crap out of the box)

Receiving the Cub Den 1.5 from USPS

Receiving the Cub Den 1.5 from USPS (2)

Ok 2nd update. I setup the shelter as soon as I got home in the pouring rain….bless my GF for standing out there to take pics. :p

I am DEFINITELY glad I got the larger shelter of the two. I can fit two regularly size sleeping pads in there with a little room at the end for my pack when pitched to the ground for storms. This would be fine if it were my GF and I, perhaps a little close for comfort with two guys but doable (but the guy near the beak is exposed to sideways rain)

If I I pitch the tarp up off the ground 6 inches, I'm sure it could accommodate a friend and I pretty decently, but not a ton of room to spare.

Even pitched to the ground it gives my 5-9 self plenty of headroom to spare, and if I was solo, gobs of space for my gear and room to move to the back of the shelter if the weather gets bad. I like not having an extended beat as it's one less thing to setup and I maintain my ventilation somewhat. Getting the hang of pitching quickly will take some practice. Not easy in the pouring rain and dim light. :p

(For reference: I'm 5-9 tall and 195 lbs. Size 11 shoe. Red pad, 20in wide and full length, Yellow pad, is 20in wide NeoAir Short, Front beak is pitched at 30in, not sure on the rear peak as I had to rig a fixed length pole to work a little sideways, my adj poles aren't in yet.)

BearPawk Cub Den 1.5

BearPawk Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

BearPaw Cub Den 1.5

PostedMay 18, 2011 at 8:05 pm

Looks great. I ordered one in silnylon with the beak since my budget doesn't allow for cuben toys yet. I did have John make the netting attach with velcro so I don't have to carry the extra weight of the netting when it isn't needed. It should arrive tomorrow and I'm pretty excited.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 4:33 am

Yeah it's great to have options, BearPaw is good about that, but it drives you nuts, haha.

I did not consider detachable bug netting because I didn't want the added weight of the velcro all around, but it does give you the option to remove it when you want.

I fought with:

Cub Den 1.5 Tarp and Bivy vs. Cub Den 1.5 Tent w/ bug netting (what I got) and beak or no beak for both shelter options I considered.

I knew I was not comfy with the amount of coverage the Hexamid gave me (judging from photos, who knows maybe I'd be fine) in bad weather (only a little bit more than my Poncho/Tarp) and with the extended beak I figured I'd get wet with the condensation anyway and that would pull the weight difference of the Hexamid w/ beak vs. Cub Den 1.5 w/ no beak to 1.92 ounces and $120 extra. Wasn't worth it to me to have to potentially deal with condensation and the unknown, but others may differ in their choice.

With the ability to remove the bivy in colder weather with no risk of bugs, I could def go lighter, but then I'd miss out on one of the benefits of the bivy in colder weather…seal out drafts for a guy that tosses and turns in a quilt. And I didn't want a bivy in warmer weather, because I want the ability to stretch out and subconsciously regulate my temperature by putting my feet outside the quilt when I get warm.

The other nice things about the bug netting is that it would act as as primitive splash guard for rain as well at the perimeter of my tent, keeping not only my quilt, but most of my gear drier. Plus I am human….maybe I think there won't be bugs on a trip but I bed down for the night and I've guessed wrong on a multi-day trip, now what? :o So I carry a weight penalty for that comfort factor I guess. And with the bug netting at the perimeter I can squeeze on my GF or a buddy it looks like.

Tough calls all the way around, but nice to have options and quick shipping by the manufacturer. These days if folks want an extended beak he recommends a vent at the top of the shelter to vent condensation which I didn't want either (added weight). So I'll just get to the back of my roomy shelter is bad weather. From the downpour last night I think I'll be ok, but field testing is best.

John Mc BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 7:43 am

It looks like your foot box of your sleeping bag will be touching the tent wall. That equals wet bag. I'm 5'-9" also and have ran into the same situation with my Lightheart Cuben Solo. I need to find a way to 'lift' where my feet are. BTY….the Lightheart is AMAZING! Super light and mass interior space. I only need to resolve the foot box issue.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 7:58 am

How much condensation do you get in your lightheart solo and I have a sil nylon solo but have plenty room and Im 5'10" How thick of a mat do you use?

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 9:18 am

Hello,

If you look at my pics (I admit, may be difficult to tell w/out being there), I had room for my head and the extra fabric of a sleeping bag above me and room at my feet to stuff my pack, so I doubt I'll have condensation issues at my feet, but may brush up along the sides with two people crammed in there in worst case scenario.

Also, my pics were taken in a worst case scenario….

– Shelter pitched to the absolutely ground (normally it's 6in off the ground)
– Two sleeping pads (Normally it'd just be me going solo plus my gear)

The Lightheart solo is a nice shelter, but was too heavy and expensive for me:

http://www.lightheartgear.com/LightHeart_Gear/Cuben.html

It comes in more expensive ($575) and heavier than my Cub Den it seems (18-20 oz vs. 12.1 oz including shelter, lineloc 3s, and 30 feet or guy lines)

The SMD Skyscape X looks interesting with a quoted weight of 16oz and price of $450, but not sure if the quoted weight includes stuff sack, guy lines, linelocs are included in the quoted weight or not.

Jake Palmer BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 9:36 am

"It comes in more expensive ($575) and heavier than my Cub Den it seems (18-20 oz vs. 12.1 oz including shelter, lineloc 3s, and 30 feet or guy lines)"

The Lightheart is a double wall tent with a floor. Kind of apples and oranges when compared with a floorless tarp.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 9:38 am

I don't like the Bear Paw for the simple fact it takes 2 poles to setup as opposed to 1 with the Hexamid. I've seen too many broken poles to rely that heavily in setting up a shelter. I guess you could carry a spare in your pack, but that negates some of the weight savings.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 9:45 am

Hi Peter,

I've come across similar posts like yours, and I can understand the want for redundancy, but in my travels I have never broken a pole and in the NE there are always plenty of sticks around. Could be different in other areas of the country I suppose.

The Cub Den 1.5 also has a webbing strap at the highest peak to tie it off to an overhead tree if need be.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 9:55 am

My polycro ground sheet is 1.25 oz and can be found in window insulation kits at hardware stores for a couple of bucks. I do not see a benefit from the bug netting acting as a double wall (condensation perhaps?), but that is a difference between my shelter and the lightheart solo and contributes to weight difference.

Another option would be to purchase a net tent for $90 w/ flooring. 8 oz in CF + just the tarp version of the Cub Den 1.5, 5 oz = ~13-14 oz double wall shelter. This would give you the "double wall" if you prefer that as well:

http://www.bearpawwd.com/shelters_floors/pyraNet1.html

(I'm working quickly so not scrutinizing weights and floor print between the two as per my usual :p)

Jake Palmer BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 10:03 am

"I do not see a benefit from the bug netting acting as a double wall (condensation perhaps?)"

Condensation is one advantage, but the other big one is the ability to roll up the fly and see the stars. I like having a view on nice nights.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 10:13 am

I opted for the larger Cub Den vs. hexamid w/ beak after reading reports of condensation (and not willing to add a vent ) and for extra coverage. We'll see if the bigger shelter indeed leads to less condensation.

I am used to a Poncho/Tarp, so no moon roof for me, it was narrow enough to just cock my head a bit to the side and see the stars. I won't get this ability with my cub den 1.5 on both sides, but perhaps on the side with the awning. :)

The other thing I just thought about is generally my view of the stars is blocked my trees in the NE. Perhaps there are more open places in your neck of the "woods." :)

roberto nahue BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 10:41 am

like you said… the extra tieouts help increase the space at the foot box… and also you could pitch it a bit higher and be ok…

i ordered the cub den 2 for me, my wife and dog… i haven't taken my dog yet but when the wife comes along it's plenty of room for the two of us…

i am going by myself most of the time, so i am planning on getting a minimalist 1 to lower my total weight… and then i'll get a cub den 1.5…

check out my review on my tent :D not the greatest but you can see pics of it too…

http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/reviews/display_reviews?forum_thread_id=44194&cat=Shelters%20-%20Tarps%20%26%20Floorless&cid=33

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 11:22 am

Roberto, prior to my review, your review was about the only freaking one I could find on a Cub Den of any size, on the net. So much appreciated haha.

Speaking of dogs….when speaking to the owner of BearPaw he said he made the Cub Den 1.5 originally to house a person and his/her dog, haha. So it works nicely for one person with a lot of protection and gear to spread out with, or two people really crammed in there if need be. :)

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 11:27 am

Actually looks like a pretty big shelter for one, and longer and wider than my Cub Den 1.5:

http://www.lightheartgear.com/LightHeart_Gear/solo_specs.html

If someone of similar size (5-9) is getting condensation from running up against the inside of the shelter, I'd think it would be because it narrows down too much width wise where your feet would go? Is that more the problem than height near your feet? it's a pretty long shelter.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 11:37 am

"I don't like the Bear Paw for the simple fact it takes 2 poles to setup as opposed to 1 with the Hexamid. I've seen too many broken poles to rely that heavily in setting up a shelter. I guess you could carry a spare in your pack, but that negates some of the weight savings."

Simply not true for any east coaster, and many west coasters. You CAN use 2 poles to set it up, or you CAN use 2 sticks to set it up, or you CAN use one pole and one stick to set it up, etc. Thinking you have to carry a spare pole, or buy a Contrail because it only uses one pole, is just, well, silly.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 11:51 am

Or tie off above you to tie it to a tree for the high peak of the shelter.

And I suppose you don't need the ~30in shortened pole in the front if you had a small tree to tie off horizontally…. certainly more convenient with the poles though.

This would apply to the MLD Trailstar/Cricket as well.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:12 pm

Well I just came home and my Cub Den was waiting for. I have to say that my first impression is that I am not going to need a new shelter for a while. I purchased the silnylon version with the extended beak and perimeter netting. I had John make the netting attach with velcro so that I can leave it at home when bugs are not an issue. There is ample room for me and my gear (5"9 140 lbs) and if you use the side panel tie outs, there is even more room. I'm still fiddling with setup and after I will try to weigh it all.
First Setup

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:26 pm

Nice pitch Tyler…. looks like u have more daylight and better weather to play with yours.

Can you describe the steps you took to pitch it? It's a little tricky and I had little time to practice.

From the pic, it looks like your poles are slightly -> /

vs. in the blueprint (http://www.bearpawwd.com/tents_tarps/tent_images/cubden/dcubden1_Dim.jpg) -> / |

Is this the case or just the pic? I had trouble getting it -> / | as well, but I was dealing with fixed poles which aren't optimal.

What is your finished weight?

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:26 pm

I guess the picture doesn't show the height well but when I sit up in it, I have several inches of space left between my head and the silnylon. I'm coming from the Contrail and this has more headroom and it's more usable since the apex is not right at the front.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:36 pm

Agreed on the height Tyler. We're the same height and even pitched to the ground I had tons of room above me at the peak.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:38 pm

It's actually more the angle of the picture. When I have the beak down I place the front pole inside so I have to angle it more. When the beak is rolled up, I can place the front pole out side to provide a whole lot more room. Ya the pitch is kind of fiddly at first. I stake out the 4 corners first and then put up the rear pole. I then use the apex guyout to secure the rear. Then at the front, I add the front pole and use it's guyout to secure it. I then go around and tension up all the guylines and adjust the angle of a stake or two. I'm still getting the hang of it but with some practice it should take just a minute or two. As it would happen I seem to have misplaced my scale so I will post my weights later today. Unfortunately no rain in the forecast for a while so that test will have to wait. One little problem that I am having is with the rear pole. The handle of my pole is wanting to slide around on the area where the silnylon has been reinforced forcing me to angle the pole to provide more stability. Wondering if this is an issue for your cuben version? With the side panel tieouts this thing is a palace for one. Way larger than the Contrail I sold to buy this.

Bryce BPL Member
PostedMay 19, 2011 at 1:43 pm

W/ regards to the rear pole, I had to cock it off center a bit (right to left as you look into the shelter straight on. This can be seen in the 3rd and 4th pictures of my initial post.

I had no trouble with slipping on the CF< but there are variables at play like the plastic on the top of my pole may be different than yours and I had the end of my pole driven into the ground (even though it was a bit sideways to fit).

I imagine when I get my adj poles and the rear pole for the high peak can sit up more upright it will be even more secure.

PostedMay 19, 2011 at 2:30 pm

Ya having adjustable poles I think helps with this shelter. I have been playing around with a couple different heights and stuff. You can just about pitch this as high as you want depending on the conditions I would expect. Alright so I found my scale so here are some of the weights.

removable netting: 6.1oz
provided stuff sack: .4oz
cubden+beak+guylines:17oz

I haven't decided on what lengths guylines I want so I just weighed it with a bunch I just had laying around. Add in a ground sheet and I'm around 24oz with all the components. The part I like best is that when bugs are not an issue I can just bring the 17oz tarp. I like the modularity this will provide and the usable floorspace.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 47 total)
Loading...