Topic

The North Face Sputnik 2P Single-Wall Tent… a backyard over-view.

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
PostedMay 6, 2011 at 8:59 pm

Hi guys and gals.

The North Face Sputnik 2P Breathable Single-Wall Tent

I thought some you of you here might be interested in the new Sputnik from The North Face, a light-weight, breathable single-wall, single door, dual-vestibule 2P shelter. I was able to set one up, look it over, shoot some pix and spend an over-night in it. Here are the details:

The shelter uses a new utilizes a new breathable fabric TNF calls "Drywall", which is supposedly very strong, light-weight, waterproof and breathable with a robust DWR. That, along with multiple venting options, is supposed to help the Sputnik reduce or eliminate condensation.

Sputnik 2P Storage Sack

Sputnik 2P Storage Sack

Sputnik 2P Tent body, Stuff Sack, Poles, Stakes and associated storage sacks.

The Sputnik appears to be the love-child of TNF and Henry Shires (Tarptent), and in fact utilizes the same strut-type, two-point stake out corner design as his Sublite, Moment, Hogback, etc.

Sputnik 2P foot

These struts appear to be made of aluminum and remain permanently in the tent. You cannot remove them. The Sputnik + poles weighs in at 2lbs, 14oz exactly and will pack down into a 13 x 6 stuff sack fairly easily. The included compression sack is quite a bit larger, but is made of high-quality sil-nylon and weighs in at 2.4 oz. Eight high-quality DAC aluminum stakes are provided, as are sacks for the poles and stakes, which are made of standard nylon, not sil-nylon.

The Sputnik uses a 2-pole design (main and brow) which are constructed of high-end DAC Featherlite NSL aluminum, with the main pole having a unique taper to it – wider in the middle, narrower at the ends.

Sputnik 2P Poles

According to TNF, this was to help facilitate the very tight bend of the design. The poles together weigh in at 7.6 oz. Interestingly, they did not include a pole repair sleeve.

The tent is not free-standing, but still goes up rather quickly if you first stake out the two loops which receive the pole ends, attach the main pole, which you then attach to the tent. Once that is done, stake out the 4 corners, followed by the door and back vestibule, tighten up the two-point struts at each corner, followed by a final tug on each the door and back vestibule again. Took me about 5 minutes the first time to set it up. I tried two other times, and got it down to about 3 minutes or so, with each time resulting in a tighter pitch.

Sputnik 2P in Backyard

Back of Sputnik 2P

TNF specs 82" x 56.5" floor dimensions, 30.7 sq ft,  and a ceiling height of 39". This specs like a true 2-person tent, but nothing exceptional. But inside, it feels much larger than I expected (it dwarfed my two Thermarest prolite pads, 20 x 46 each).

Thermarest 20 x 46 pads in Sputnik 2P

20 x 46 Thermarest pads on Sputnik footprint for size reference.

The brow pole and the steep vertical multi-panel walls allow two full-sized adults to stretch out and fit comfortably. You could certainly squeeze 3 in a pinch. 4 people could easily enjoy a game of cards inside due to the already mentioned vertical walls and a ceiling height that remains very spacious across a large portion of the roof line. You can't help but be surprised when you first go inside. Once there, you'll notice loops for attaching a gear caddy, as well as two pockets for storage in opposing corners.

It is a very good thing the Sputnik is so large inside, because the two vestibules are very small. TNF specs 3 sq ft each and I'm sure that is about accurate! To make matters worse, you only get a very small doorway on the non-door side vestibule to access gear.

Sputnik 2P rear vestibule opening.

I'm thinking a pair of boots or trail runners is about all you could squeeze through. Even a partially full pack will have difficulty passing through the doorway, unless you are going ultra-light with an appropriately sized pack. Maybe this would be a good place to put a small pooch, cat or possibly store your cooking gear? All joking aside, I'm thinking a pair of boots is the ticket. One other thing, and this is a real stickler for me, the door and vestibule are situated so that rain will absolutely fall into your tent during inclement weather. I really wish that tent designers would address this in their fly designs. Seems a no-brainer to me. Just saying…

Ok… so what about venting options? Along with the already mentioned breathable Drywall fabric, you have several additional options to keep condensation at bay. Aside from fully opening and tacking back the main door fly, both it and the back vestibule allow you to fold up the bottom portion about 5 to 6 inches and stash it up to an elastic loop, thus increasing the potential for air flow.

Sputnik 2P ear vestibule fully deployed.
Sputnik 2P rear vestibule raised.

You can easily raise the vestibules and put them back down from inside the tent. The door's dual-zippers also allow you to open from the top to create additional venting.

Sputnik 2P door fully closed.
Sputnik 2P front door opened at top for increased ventilation.

It works, but the door and the vestibule's top flap lack a leg and velcro to prop up the vent, so its effectiveness is somewhat lacking. There is nothing stopping you from propping something in there to create a more effective vent, but I think TNF dropped the ball here. The did include a small window, however, so you can check on the weather from inside the tent.

Another area they blew it (IMHO) is the color choice. What were they thinking? Light gray and silver-ish colored walls, dark, cement gray floor, bright, 80's era neon green and mis-matched neon-yellow accents? Really? Come on guys! Maybe this would look good on the moon, or maybe in some really bad episode of Miami Vice, but out in the back country? Not a chance. Seriously, it is not a good looking tent. But… looks aren't everything, right? Bottom line: don't expect to impress your friends with your Sputnik's ability to "blend" into the wilderness!

Ok… so I put in a backyard overnight in the Sputnik, just because I could. The night was cool (about 38 degrees) and the early evening winds had died down to maybe 1 or 2 MPH, if at all. I had the vestibules raised up for max ventilation, did not utilize the door's upper venting option, but rather had it fully closed for the night, specifically to test the breath-ability of the Drywall fabric. When I awoke in the early morning, the grass in the yard was very damp and there was clearly condensation on the non-breathable vestibules. I checked all the internal Drywall fabric and found it nearly 100% dry. Only in a few small places did it feel slightly damp, and even then, it was more cold than anything. I was impressed, as similar backyard conditions have left other single-wall tents I own (and a few double-wall as well) dripping with condensation by morning. I am wondering about the Drywall fabrics ability to be 100% waterproof AND breathable for extended periods of rain. Seems a good trashing in the back country might be in order? I'll see what I can muster up!

Ok… There you go. TNF has an intriguing tent design with the Sputnik 2P. It is seriously light in weight for space it provides, packs small, is simple and quick to set up, and the Drywall fabric seems promising. On the downside, the color is horrible (IMHO), the door vent needs work and the small vestibules are a serious limitation. But at 2lbs, 14oz, this would be a sick single-person palace, and you would have more than enough room to store all your gear AND still flop around inside like fish out of water.

Let me know if you have any questions.

diego dean BPL Member
PostedMay 7, 2011 at 5:51 am

Thanks for taking the time to write thorough, detailed review. Always appreciated!!

PostedMay 7, 2011 at 9:11 am

Here is an update:

I was able to do one more overnight in the backyard (I couldn't make it up to the local campsite) before I returned the tent. Conditions were similar to the first backyard overnight, but temps were in the high 40's to low 50's this time and there was absolutely no wind at all. I also had my 5 year-old daughter in tow. The rear vestibule was raised for max ventilation and the main door fly was tied back fully for the night. The Sputnik was set to maximum venting. How did it fair? Poorly this time.

By 3am, I awoke to a drops of condensation hitting my face. I fired up my headlamp to see considerable beading and condensation all along the roof and down the sides of the "Drywall" tent body. I opened the small doorway into the rear vestibule to check the condition of the non-breathable fly fabric. It was worse, as was to be expected, but not significantly more so than the Drywall fabric. I decided to go outside to check of the pitch and found only minor stretching. That is a plus, as some of the newer tent fabrics stretch quite a bit when temps and/or humidity changes. After tightening up the Sputnik slightly, I want back inside to find more drops on the tent floor and on both my bag and my daughter's. If we were in the back country, I'd break out the tent sponge, but since we were at home, decided to call it off and spend the remainder of the night in the house.

I awoke early the next morning to check on the Sputnik. The door fly was soaked, both inside and out (the window was completely fogged up) and there were several places on the Drywall tent body that had wet out from the inside.

Sputnik 2P Condesation on main door fly and window

Sputnik 2P Drywall condensation from inside tent body

More Sputnik 2P main door fly condensation

Konrad . BPL Member
PostedMay 7, 2011 at 9:18 am

Thanks David for the update on the tent, and good call on returning it. If its performance isn't any better than the lightweight single-skin/hybrid offerings we see from Tarptent, SMD, or Lightheartgear, than I really see no point in taking on the extra weight, and smaller user space.

PostedMay 7, 2011 at 9:55 am

The floor shows all the places the condensation either dropped, rolled down the Drywall fabric and collected at the base of the tent or interestingly, even though a Sputnik footprint was used, wet up from the bottom.

Sputnik 2P floor, condensation
Sputnik 2P floor condensation 2
Sputnik 2P floor, condensation 3

I will concede that my backyard can be a condensation nightmare (cool, damp grass and often, little to no winds during the night), which is why I love to use it for a quick check of a shelter's ability to shed it. So in the Sputnik's defense, this might have been one of those bad nights. Had we a breeze, things most certainly would have fared differently. Regardless, there are a few things that concern me.

1. The tent was opened up for maximum ventilation. You could do nothing more to help ventilate, except open the main mesh tent door and tie it back as well (hardly a useful solution for damp, inclement or buggy nights). Possibly pitching the main door into a headwind might help further, but on a windless night, that option would be mute. Breathable Drywall fabric or not, this shelter could use more venting options. I think that a ceiling vent or two would go a long way to help out the breathable out.

2. The non-breathable vestibule and fly fabric comes into contact and lays against the tent body/mesh in more places than seems acceptable, promoting the transfer of condensation into the tent. This is especially apparent at the main door, and is exacerbated when you open the door to either enter/exit the tent or make adjustments to the ventilation. This could be indicative of my pitch, but in looking the Sputnik over carefully, it seems TNF needs to make a few design changes to keep the tent effectively separated from the fly/vestibules.

Please take into consideration that I have not been able to take the Sputnik out for a multi-day trip, and cannot provide any real-world experience. Additionally, the tent fared very well on it's first backyard over-night (there was a gentle breeze that night), so this second night may hardly be an indicator of the Sputnik's inability to shed condensation. Bad night not-with-standing, the Sputnik is intriguing, offers quite a large space for just 2lbs, 14oz, packs small and seems well constructed. Is it worth checking out? Yes, especially if you have experience with using single-wall shelters. But I have this gut feeling that it will be available for quite a bit less than the $265 retail in the not too distant future.

PostedMay 7, 2011 at 11:29 am

Hi Konrad,

In the Sputnik's defense, it is possible that a non-breathable single-wall, like a Six Moons or Tarptent or Nemo Meta, etc., might have fared much worse. But in those other designs, there are significantly greater options for ventilation, especially on rainless nights with very little wind. My guess is that the TNF is relying heavily on the breath-ability of the Drywall fabric in this design. Ceiling vents would help significantly on windless nights and in conditions observed in my backyard and should be considered if any revision to the design is green-lit.

Part of me wants to see how the Sputnik would equate itself on a multi-day trip, but there are too many other design limitations (the tiny vestibules rank high) such that I'm recommending to the owner that they take it back.

Now if they don't, you know I'll beg for a chance to put it to good use and will report back my findings! :)

PostedMay 7, 2011 at 11:35 am

Thanks David for continuing your report for the condensation section.

Any tent will get condensation in the right conditions but the Sputnik 2 seems to be, despite its "Drywall" name, no better than regular silnylon.

My TT Moment has many more venting options than TNF Sputnik 2. Personally I'd go with a Fly Creek 2 or Scarp II for a light two person tent.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Loading...