Topic

First Impressions: TrailLite Designs Single Track pack

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Eugene Smith BPL Member
PostedApr 11, 2011 at 5:45 am

First Impressions: TrailLite Designs Single Track pack

In the current market of cottage industry UL packs, the low volume multi-sport day pack is often overlooked and underdeveloped- far too often day packs materialize on shelves in the form of oversized floppy stuff sacks with some silly daisy chains tacked on the back and a pair of rudimentary shoulder straps- little if any attention is given to how the contents fit and ride inside the pack. No secret, there is an established heritage of lightweight multisport/adventure based packs from the likes of: Salomon, Inov8, Golite, Nathan, Osprey, Gregory, Ultimate Direction, Terra Nova- these are mainstream companies with years of development and feedback from wearers. What is currently available in the cottage industry for those looking to support the “Made In USA” small guy? Not much…nada. Where does that leave those of us looking for a multi-sport day use pack amongst the cottage industry makers? Seemingly left to Google search and pick your poison amongst the fray in the day pack market, or peruse the REI walls.

Enter the Single Track pack (Prototype 1) from Traillite Designs. Contributing Backpacking Light.com member Thom Darrah has been working up ideas for a sub 10oz. UL multisport day pack geared toward day hikers, trailrunners, adventure based outings, and other off pavement pursuits. The multi-sport day pack is a difficult corner of the pack world, unlike a traditional Jardine derived UL backpacking rucksack, the demands and feature requirements of the multisport wearer will vary tremendously for such activities like: trailrunning, day hiking, mountain biking, scrambling, ultramarathons, SUL overnight mountain raids, bc skiing, to name a few- making a single pack that can meet many of the needs of such a wide variety of users is no easy feat.

Is the Single Track pack successful? Too soon to tell, but it’s looking promising.

“Run Report”:

I recently took the Single Track pack through the paces on a short 7 mile early morning trail run along one of my daily trail routes to see how it rode- running is such a repetitive activity and a great revealer- inadequacies and weaknesses in your body’s bio-mechanics and in your running kit (shoes, clothing, socks, shells, packs) are brought to light in short order.

Typically, for a run shy of 15 miles, a single handheld water bottle or two is sufficient for year round trail running in the desert for me. The Single Track being a 850-1200 ci. pack would likely be a pack that I would save for trail marathons, ultramarathon distance runs, and long day hikes. So for this short initial run I simply loaded up the pack with a typical kit I’d use for a trail race, but for reference, these items could very easily assume the role of items many of us take on a nice day hike.

Giddy up.

IMG_2714 - Version 2

Early morning light breaks over the top of Tortugas Mountain, my local go to run route, a generous title considering Tortugas ‘Mountain’ only gains just shy of 1K in elevation from the base, however it is prominent and offers great technical trail running within city limits.

IMG_2724

Corridor into a series of switchbacks that gain footing up the West face of Tortugas Mountain, brief but steep, they expedite heart rate elevation off the bat

IMG_2728 - Version 2

The short pitchy climb is rewarded with great views of the Organs- early morning runs are what it’s all about.

IMG_2731

This is one of those sections of single track that makes running effortless.

Pack profile

In atypical fashion, I stopped mid-run for several minutes to do the Single Track pack justice and share some of the simple but functional features of the pack for this post. Aesthetically speaking, it’s one sharp SOB if that’s of concern to you, the stealth Xpac cloth making up the entire body of the pack has a nice low key matte finish to it and should provide most importantly, durability! Let it be known, a 7-mile run is obviously to brief a window to really comment on the durability of the pack, but having used other day packs with flimsier materials with no ill effects under normal wear and tear- FWIW I’d have no concern of the longevity of the Single Track pack with it’s current Xpac body.

Pack profile

Key Features:

– compact asymmetrical design
– dual side bottle pockets with mini-cord locks for retention
– internal hydration bladder sleeve and top exiting hose port
– genius single pull compression cording
– large rear pocket
– slender main pack body for load stability
– simple webbing belt with quick release buckle
– spacer mesh shoulder straps w/ daisy chains to attach accessories
– black pack body *for stealth SUL mountain raids or urban graffiti missions
– RiRi waterproof zipper
– Xpac material for durability and weight savings
– sternum strap
– haul loop

Shoulder straps

Shoulder straps make a pack

The shoulder straps are superbly made and comfortable. Christopher Zimmer was the craftsman behind this pack, responsible for formulating Thom’s ideas into a tangible object of UL desire… well you know what I mean. 3D spacer mesh lines both sides of the curved shoulder strap, sandwiching a layer of Xpac in between- I think this is generous, perhaps too generous, as some weight could be saved here as well as decreasing material surface contact with the body by only using a single layer of 3D spacer mesh. The shoulder straps attach to the pack body pretty straight forward, however there isn’t a flaw in the construction and Chris was diligent in hiding seams and disguising the building process- it’s clear that durability was the prevailing goal in the project.

Shoulder pocket

Cute handy little shoulder accessory pocket…yeah I said cute, what!?

Simple webbing runs down the middle of the shoulder strap for attaching accessories and pockets, of which are in the works according to Thom. The accessory pocket on the Single Track prototype I received is clever, attached with 2 short runs of cord and a mini-cordlock per cord to cinch up wherever the wearer prefers on the shoulder strap. The accessory pocket has 2 compartments, one front open pocket for gels, phone, compact camera, and the 2nd compartment is a RiRi zippered pocket for ID. I found the design to be slick, however the dimensions were a tad to small, all my items took some effort to get in and out. Accessing items required me to stop which isn’t ideal in a “fast and light” pack geared toward forward momentum. This should be addressed, perhaps a stretch mesh outer pocket with a simple cord lock top closure for storing gel wrappers, sunglasses, camera, Clif bars etc. that would accommodate more items on the go with minimal effort while running or hiking.

Bottle holsters

Upright bottle sleeves hug each side of the Single Track pack, accommodating standard 20oz. and 26oz. bottles, 2 standard Aquafina bottles fit as well if you’re of that ilk. Mini-Cord locks run through a collar at the top of the sleeves to secure the bottle while moving. I’m a handheld user for trailrunning, this is the easiest way to transition at aid stations and refill bottles quickly and painlessly, hydration bladders suck IMO in most cases, so the option to use both bottles or hydration bladders should make everyone happy. One glaring issue I found was that the construction of the sleeve was so spot on, the tolerances were just too tight and made loading and extracting a bottle a two handed operation that required more effort than my lazy butt cared to expend at the time- this did wonders for my confidence that I wouldn’t lose a bottle however.

Compression system

No two compression systems are alike, this is definitely the case with the Single Track- single pull compression held my Houdini in place just fine on the outside

The compression system on the Single Track is nifty, single pull via the bottom of the pack stabilizes the entire pack load, compresses the items in the rear stuff pocket, as well as providing tension on items lashed on the outside of the cording. It’s a fast compression system that doesn’t require any thinking. I dig it.

Loaded items

Not items I typically take on a 7 mile run in early spring, but this kit simulates what I take for a longer run upwards of 15 miles in the mountains

Gear list items in pack on this run:

– x2 Ultimate Direction kicker water bottles
– Patagonia Houdini windshell
– Pata Capilene 3 zip shirt
– pair of socks
– Defeet gloves
– x2 GU gels
– electrolytes (in tube)
– Canon S21400is compact camera
– Petzl Tikka XP2 headlamp
– ipod nano + headphones (currently playing the heaviness of the new Mogwai album)

I’m not a scientist, in fact I’m horrible at math, so I’m going to spare you the postulating on volume and dimensions. I’ll sum it up to this: it’s big enough. If you’re going out for a short hike or extended run and need to throw in a windshell, lightweight insulation piece, liner gloves, headlamp, carbs, hat, camera, FAK, rattle snake anti-venom, SUL tarp or bivy, 40oz. of Steel Reserve… this pack has you covered for day use and for the savvy kit assemblers, could even do a SUL overnight, perfect for that personal epic.

loaded pack triptych

Triptych showing all items loaded up and ready to go

The pack is clearly compact and svelte, however I had difficulty filling up the entire pack body even with my ample running kit, leaving a small void in the pack that was ‘floppy’ towards the top, which leads to my biggest issue with the Single Track pack as a trail running pack, the bounce factor. I had to cinch tightly down on the shoulder straps and secure the sternum strap snugly to maintain a smooth ride while running, but this didn’t completely address the issue. This is where fully developed running packs shine, in the harness system, and also where the Single Track pack needs to be further fine tuned in the next phase of design. I was able to slip my full hand under the shoulder straps as they bounced on the flat sections of trail- where pack bounce was most pronounced. I find this to be the only real glaring disappointment amongst a stellar piece of kit. I didn’t enjoy wearing the webbing belt while running, so I cannot comment on if or how much the belt would improve the pack movement.

Pack carry

Pack rides nicely high on the back as it should, however accessing bottles while running was impossible for me, this is a stop and go sort of pack in it’s current state

IMG_2770

Running along Deer Trail on the E side of Tortugas Mountain, sunlight starting to fill in the creosote, ocotillo, and mesquite bush of the upper stretches of the great Chihuahuan Desert.

IMG_2773

A super highway for the desert dwellers scaled and legless, two legged, or four.

Thoughts, remarks, suggestions, and feedback:

– The Single Track pack is veering towards becoming a “Double Track” pack, pun totally intended. The pack is slightly confused on it’s intended purpose- Is it a trailrunning dedicated pack or is it a day hiking pack? Is it a multi-sport pack or is it a SUL overnight pack? All of the above? I still don’t know, it has potential for all areas and all kinds of users. I think it could serve many purposes with some tweaking.

– The shoulder straps are a thing of beauty, but the harness as a whole system needs work if this pack is to be suitable for extended trail running and brisk day hiking. It’s all about the ergonomics, which is why many available hydration packs are designed and worn like a 2-point upper body hugging harnesses resembling a brassiere… embrace the support! A heavier load would’ve easily offset the bounce I noticed, but running with a fully loaded day pack just isn’t something I do often.

– Accessory shoulder pocket dimensions are a touch too small- increase size and volume

– Xpack material is excellent, not the lightest solution, but durable

– Some hardware could be pared down to save a minimum amount of weight without compromising durability

– Construction is flawless!

Fin.

t.darrah BPL Member
PostedApr 11, 2011 at 6:12 am

Eugene,
Thanks for the RR (Run Report)and gear review. As always great writing and nice pictures.

Your analysis and suggestions are greatly appreciated and very much valued. Many of your findings were identical to my own. I will attempt incorporate the required changes and corrections in the 2nd prototype and if your willing have you test the pack again.

Many thanks,
Thom
TrailLite Designs

PostedApr 11, 2011 at 9:11 am

@Thom & Chris
Another great-looking pack from TLD– it really comes across that there's a successful collaboration taking place here!


@Eugene

Another great review– I always enjoy your writing style. What make/model of camera, lenses, filters, and/or software are you using for these photos?

As well, if this pack needs a good, non-smoking home where it will be well cared for and taken often on long walks and biking commutes, I just might know of a place… =D!

PostedApr 11, 2011 at 5:25 pm

I fully admit I'm a pack wh*re. Osprey, Ergon, REI, Gregory are all packs I own and use/have used. Right now the cream of the crop is a Wingnut 3.0 for multi day bikepacking. The reason being is that it has the canted storage on the hips. No cheesy hip belt pockets (those just don't work right!!!) on this thing. At 800 c.i. it is a perfect size for my intended use. It's biggest weakness is its terrible shoulder straps. They need to change those.

I'm very interested in where this pack is headed. I think it has some real potential. I would love to see this pack usable on the go. Being able to grab water or food from the side pockets are going to be key.

Keep the weight as light as possible while maintaining it's structure/durablity and this thing could be a winner. Please continue to update us as to how this is going. I know my interest is peaked.

David Chenault BPL Member
PostedApr 11, 2011 at 6:04 pm

Nice review Eugene. Looks a bit warm down there.

I've never had a pack other than the Nathan HPL 020 that I found at all tolerable for running. I'm interested to here thoughts from those yet to retire from running on what makes a pack suitable for running.

Eugene Smith BPL Member
PostedApr 12, 2011 at 6:48 am

Dave,

Yep, it's warming up down here, we're just high enough in altitude to have cool evenings, but temps are on the up.

"I'm interested to here thoughts from those yet to retire from running on what makes a pack suitable for running."

No bounce!

This is just my experience- the pack has to be able to disperse the weight of the water and gear across the center of the upper back and torso. The Nathan packs as well as the Ultimate Direction packs wear more like fishing vests if anything, they're non-restricting and very light, they don't bounce whatsoever, the shoulder straps rise up over the back like a yoke- however they're only good for essentials, not an UL kit of gear for an overnight. Materials seem to help tremendously as well, the wider and lighter the shoulder straps the more the pack becomes unnoticeable- the Nathan mesh shoulder straps are a perfect example.

The Black Diamond Bbee is one backpack that get's it right, it's not a hydration vest style pack like the one's above, rather a simple ruck that rides high and tight, doesn't bounce, and carries water and gear- I've seen a few of these at races.

PostedApr 12, 2011 at 11:49 am

It’s nice to see a cottage industry effort at a small sport-oriented pack. I’ve used two packs for running; the talon 22 and Nathan 020.

This pack appears to aim more for the talon 22. To be honest, I greatly prefer the Nathan 020 design type (fishing vest, really minimal). I’ve seen some mention the Nathan having a higher volume pack with bottle storage reachable on the move (063 AR maybe?), would love to see something along those lines.

"I'm interested to here thoughts from those yet to retire from running on what makes a pack suitable for running."

Here’s my current running pack wish list:

– No bounce, or at least very minimal bounce and no side-to-side sway.
– Low profile: no snag worries on tight single-track in forest environment.
– Ability to hold 2 – 20z water bottles and access each on the run
(Sub-point: water weight low, near hips. V-angle access at small of back like some belt hydration systems would be sweet.)
– Also hydration sleeve compatible
– Basic durability, but weight savings trumping any extra toughness
– Any shoulder or hip belt pockets be removable

Most of the time I use a single or dual-bottle waist pack. Still looking for a running backpack that suits me.

David Chenault BPL Member
PostedApr 12, 2011 at 12:09 pm

Ryan, look closer: you're thinking of a different pack.

Chris, sounds pretty good. I wonder what the weight limit is on the load carried by a truly stable running pack. (If any.) I love my Talon 22 and 11 for mountain biking, hiking, scrambling, etc. I have not found the 11 suitable for running, more like barely tolerable. Haven't run with the 22.

PostedApr 12, 2011 at 1:36 pm

I don't think having removable straps makes much sense (enlighten me). Other than that I agree with what you're saying.

I also wouldn't mind seeing a small handle on the top of the pack to hang it from something or make it easy to pick up.

. . BPL Member
PostedApr 12, 2011 at 1:45 pm

@Eugene – thanks for sharing


@Thom
– nice looking pack and congrats on graduating to a 3-letter acronym in the BPL world: TLD 4 SUL. nice. LOL.

Eugene Smith BPL Member
PostedApr 12, 2011 at 10:40 pm

@ Clint, I just use the only compact camera I could find that still fits into the tiny pocket on my running shorts- Canon SD1400IS, it has a horrible sensor, poor low light capability, but it's fairly light, durable enough, and I can run with it without the thing pulling my shorts down to my ankles. Software is just Aperture on my Mac.

@ Chris,

The Single Track is closer to the Talon 11 in size, but more refined and stripped down features and considerably lighter. Like you, I too prefer a harness style hydration pack (Ultimate Direction WASP) if I have to carry more than what I typically do in my 2 handheld bottle holsters.

I tried a lumbar style bottle holder 2 years ago, it never really worked out for me, there were chafe issues when I ran sans shirt, and also twisting issues with the belt. Anyone find these to work for them?

PostedApr 13, 2011 at 4:52 am

Eugene & Thom, thank you for working to expand the offerings for this type of pack.

RE : lumbar packs, I like my nathan elite 1 mutation the most. The belt uses velcro, not clips, does not loosen and is soft against the skin. No chaffing issues for runs up to a half mary or so. Longer runs and I use glide or petroleum jelly and it's fine.

I also have a UD cruz (2 bottle). The belt is not nearly as good. I have to keep a shirt under it for runs over 10 miles or I'll chafe for sure. For 2 bottles, I tend to do a single handheld and the nathan 1 bottle. I do like having at least one free hand.

Most of all, I like that each keeps water weight tight against the small of my back where the weight is not really noticable and that I can reach back, grab bottle, drink, and put bottle back, all while running.

Hydration storage is such a personal thing, it seems like all trail runners go through a bunch of products to find what works for them. I almost never need more than two bottles of water as I run where I can fill on the trail. I run quite a bit on game trails or overgrown singletrack with lots of deadfall involving ducking and jumping so weight and movement on my back is a concern.

All of that being said, there is a definite limit to the weight/volume I can carry comfortably with a lumbar pack. It's two 22 ounce bottles of water, a small digital camera, and a few ounces of food.

Keeping an eye on this and other small sport packs for now.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Loading...