Feb 27, 2011 at 7:52 am #1269795
Ok, not the most experienced here, but in the last 12 months I've logged about 25 nights out to test the philosophy and slowly but surely it's sinking in. My issue is this. I have lightened my gear load significantly and tested (Via gearswap) about a dozen shelters etc… Yet when a good outing comes up with friends and I'm not pushing myself for big miles… I tend to say, "Well, you can bring the Hubba Hubba, or The Jetboil is so easy… Etc" I have yet to go straight UL entirely. *(Tarp/BB Ultra/ Etc… ) Bare bones even knowing I'll have all I need. Is this due to inexperience? Self doubt? How long did it take most of you to shed the mentality of not pushing it to see where your true comfort levels are? Just curious. I'm a tad impatient even with myself.
EdFeb 27, 2011 at 8:31 am #1702204
Ike JutkowitzBPL Member
@ikeLocale: Central Michigan
I like the aesthetics of an uncluttered room, and this has translated to an uncluttered pack, less items to fiddle with, less to keep track of. I also find my outdoor experiences to be enriched by a little adversity (cold, hunger, soreness), at least when I'm remembering the trip after the fact. Consequently, going UL seemed like a natural fit for me right off the bat.
If you enjoy your comfort items, are traveling with people of similar mindset, and aren't planning to go far, take what you like and just enjoy it. That's what I do when I camp with my kids.
If you want to immerse yourself in UL technique, try planning a solo adventure or one with another ultralighter. Walk farther and fuss less with gear. You might just get addicted.
Either way, it's all about getting outside. Have fun.Feb 27, 2011 at 8:37 am #1702207
Joe ClementBPL Member
It's a technique, not a religion (most of the time!). Nothing wrong with taking comfort items when you're doing a short trip with friends. Use the right tools for the job.Feb 27, 2011 at 8:40 am #1702209
Steven ParisBPL Member
@saparisorLocale: Pacific Northwest
It's certainly easier to carry less weight when you are the only one responsible for your gear, either b/c you're solo or with another hiker who is responsible for their own shelter, food, etc. In most of the trip reports here on BPL, you see each person with their own tarp/tarptent and often with their own stove and cookset.
I still go on trips with friends who aren't UL and if they feel better with a traditional tent (around 4-5 lbs), I'd probably just split the weight and carry half. Usually, these are just overnighters anyway, just to get outside.Feb 27, 2011 at 8:41 am #1702211
John S.BPL Member
No problems Edward. You will read tales of many who tried flat tarps and finally decide a full shelter is better for them.Feb 27, 2011 at 8:53 am #1702215
Sarah KirkconnellBPL Member
@sarbarLocale: In the shadow of Mt. Rainier
If you are happy, then don't worry! Really…some take it too far IMO. You can take the UL concept and make it fit you – If you go from a 45 lb pack to a 25 lb pack you have still made great strides. And if you want some comforts, then go for it!Feb 27, 2011 at 9:17 am #1702224
Don AmundsonBPL Member
@amrowincLocale: Southern California
As the saying goes "the more you hike the less you need." Can't remember who gets credit for that but I've found it to be true. For me it's been a journey I started in 2008 when I decided it was time to hike the JMT. I had been out of the backpacking game for 50 years and when I started to look at gear I was blown away at the changes. So, due to a desire to give my old body a fighting chance I started researching/buying lightweight gear. Every piece of gear I bought I tested on overnight trips. I analyzed and agonized, dumped, sold, found a better choice until I was fully equipped. I did the JMT in 2009 and managed quite well. I did more research, testing, dumping and purchasing and did the OHT last year along with a 90 mile section in the Sierras carrying less weight. I'm doing the TRT and a JMT section this year with a base weight down to about 10lbs.
It has just been a process of developing confidence in my own ability and my equipment. Would what I carry work for someone else? Probably, but they would have to go through the same process I did to be comfortable with it. I always wonder about those who talk about carrying heavy to be comfortable. I've never felt uncomfortable or was lacking anything on the trail equipment related. My 14oz shelter seems to work as well as a 2lb shelter, and it has more room than many heavier shelters that I've seen. My 5oz. cooking system provides the same hot water as a 16oz jet boil. A little slower yes, but I'm not in a hurry. My 21oz quilt has kept me warm during freezing nights no different than those carrying much heavier bags.
I guess the direct answer to your question is have patience. Enjoy the journey. Over time you'll continue to lighten your load and you'll stop thinking in terms of comfort/lightweight because you'll discover lightweight is comfortable.Feb 27, 2011 at 9:33 am #1702230
Mike MBPL Member
while I have found and embraced the spartan, near sul regime (Ion, poncho/tarp, esbit stove), my significant other has not- I've gotten her into some pretty light (and comfortable) gear (base weight of ~ 11 lbs), but my base weights goes up to about 13 lbs when we hike together (vs ~ 6 lbs when going solo)
I like solo trips and the challenges of ul, but I'd much rather hike w/ my wife than by myself, so I don't have any internal conflict when it comes to "ul reluctance" :)Feb 27, 2011 at 9:44 am #1702234
Ben 2 WorldBPL Member
@ben2worldLocale: So Cal
"If you are happy, then don't worry! "
+1. Why even fuss over whether something is XUL or SUL or UL or 'traditional'? The best gear set up is the one that gives YOU the optimal balance of safety, comfort, and light weight. Oh, and I should add fun as well. Lots of people find it very rewarding to lug their DSLR's along with mulitiple lenses. Certainly not UL — but if it adds enjoyment and the overall load is still quite manageable — then who cares?Feb 27, 2011 at 9:49 am #1702237
Jerry AdamsBPL Member
@retiredjerryLocale: Oregon and Washington
When they climb Everest, they go up in altitude, then part way back down to an intermediate elevation and it seems better than if they just went straight to that intermediate elevation
If they go to $4 a gallon gas, then back down to $3 a gallon, it seems cheap
Same idea applies to ULFeb 27, 2011 at 10:04 am #1702239
Adam RothermichBPL Member
@aroth87Locale: Missouri Ozarks
I think what you'll find is that most of us have gone lighter in the past only to decide that a little extra weight for creature comforts is a worthwhile trade off. For me, I love to bring my DSLR and a handful of lenses. Sometimes I even throw in a film camera (it uses the same lenses as the digital so I'm saving weight :D). For me, its worth it to bring a couple extra pounds so I can bring back something tangible to share with friends and to give me something to do at breaks and in camp. For other people, they might love to prepare a nicer meal than dehydrated beans on tortillas, read a book, etc.
I tend go lighter when I'm solo as well. When I'm with friends (many of whom are not UL) there's no reason to deprive myself so I can go a few extra miles since that's not the goal. For the past year or two I've pretty much settled on a set of gear that works well for both solo and group trips. I don't know the exact base weight (ahh, what a free feeling!) but its somewhere between 10 and 12 lbs. Camera gear adds another 4 or 5 lbs depending on what I bring. My new wrinkle is that my wife has expressed interest in hiking with me. She's been to a few trail maintenance outings now and hasn't lost interest. The problem is that my cooking gear and shelter aren't meant for two people, so I'll probably be looking for something a little different in those areas soon. The good news is she is also into photography and we can split that load :D.
How long did it take me to figure this out? A whole bunch of hikes, campouts, maintenance and construction outings, and MYOG iterations. A handful of miserable nights, a few hills that seemed like they would never end, and even more trips where everything just seemed to click.
AdamFeb 27, 2011 at 10:13 am #1702242
eric chanBPL Member
dont worry about it .. as long as you are reasonably light enough for you
just go out and enjoy it and have fun
much better to be someone who goes out every day with a 15 lb base … than someone who wont go out unless his gear and conditions are perfect for that sub 5 lb base
i realized a while back that its not the gear that defines you … its your experience and learned skills
so go out and be happy and joyfulFeb 27, 2011 at 10:54 am #1702258
James MarcoBPL Member
@jamesdmarcoLocale: Finger Lakes
"just go out and enjoy it and have fun"
Sure, that's what it is all about. Life is too short to sweat the details.
The middle of winter is not the time for a 5# base pack. Nor is the middle of summer on a week long canoe trip. What is your typical base weight? Base weights are a variable depending on what you do, what you WANT to do. Have fun. Enjoy the outside.
I have been out with a pound of hot dogs and a bag on a two day fishing trip. Not counting the fishing gear, I was sub 3 pounds. I have been out with my wife and kids with 56 pounds.
In both cases I had fun. Far better'n work.Feb 27, 2011 at 11:09 am #1702263
Dale WambaughBPL Member
@dwambaughLocale: Pacific Northwest
The real core to UL philosophy is that you have choices: you don't have to haul 50 pounds of gear to be safe and comfortable. You put your kit together knowing why you have a particular item with you and the compromises in weight, performance and cost.
Not everyone subscribes to the Spartan SUL kits. You will sort out what works for you, providing the comfort level and toys you want to take. You don't have to use a 5 pound kit anymore than a 50 pound kit; it is your choice and the real dues are that you know what you are doing and why.Feb 27, 2011 at 11:58 am #1702273
Jake WillitsBPL Member
@trailsavvyLocale: Arkansas Ozarks
I make my own rules for how low I want to be. There is an adjustment as your base weight get's lighter anyway. Just yesterday, I packed for (what used to be) an overnighter. But with a sub 20 lb. total pack weight, it became a dayhike. I HAD planned on sleeping outdoors and testing my new shelter, but decided to hike thru. And yes, I carried my Jetboil, since it was easier and faster. Not my lightest gear, but the gear most suited to my trek. That's my number 1 personal rule. So, just "hike your own hike".Feb 27, 2011 at 12:59 pm #1702305
Thanks all, great advice. Appreciated as always. I think the disconneect is being eager to test the limits but unwilling to pull the trigger as of yet. Thanks!Feb 27, 2011 at 1:11 pm #1702311
@rcaffinLocale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe
Go with what seems best.
If you are with heavy-weight friends you may not be going far or fast enough to need to push your weight down very much.
Aha – but wait till you get a bit older … :-)
CheersFeb 27, 2011 at 4:50 pm #1702383
Elliott WolinBPL Member
@ewolinLocale: Hampton Roads, Virginia
Roger wrote: "Aha – but wait till you get a bit older … :-)"
That says it all for me! I don't think my wife and I could have taken up backpacking again if not for lightweight and UL equipment. No way our old bodies could haul those heavy packs we used to haul 25 years ago. In my case it was Ray Jardine's book "Beyond Backpacking" (revised and renamed "Trail Life") that brought us back (I owe him a debt I can never repay).
I said "lightweight and UL" for a reason…our base weights are below 15 pounds now, and maybe we'll get down to 10, but it is not a priority for us (cost is a big factor, of course). We use some UL and some not-so-UL equipment, and we are perfectly happy. Our backs require 1" thick Thermarest pads, we like to cook moderately elaborate meals, we like to regularly wash up with hot water, etc.
As someone said, UL is a technique, not a religion. My feelings exactly.Feb 27, 2011 at 5:07 pm #1702393
@footeabLocale: Pacific Northwest
I find the lighter I get my base weight, the more books I take in compensation or the more camera equipment I take. I will admit I got the Panasonic GH2 camera that cuts well over 2lbs off my camera weight compared to before though. Now I get video as well. Now I am also broke. =) Or if mountain climbing I take more cams. More screws. A couple pitons. An extra rope for descending faster.
I am still humping around 30-40lbs when all is said and done. Of course that is for a week+ trip and I like to have reading material on hand especially during high summer when it stay light out at night.
Rope 8lbs partner carries the other rope
Camera Gear 1.5lbs minimum more like 3.5lbs min now
Books: As many as I can stuff in. Always thought mp3 players in the wilderness clashed rather loudly.
Baseweight 13-20lbs depending on seasons winter is heavier obviouslyFeb 27, 2011 at 6:22 pm #1702419
Piper S.BPL Member
@sbhikesLocale: Santa Barbara (Name: Diane)
The most important thing is to get out there. 25 nights in 12 months is great, and if they weight isn't killing you then even better.
My personal experience is I've never had enough money to get very demanding of creature comforts and conveniences in real life anyway, so having crappy homemade UL gear that takes forever to cook a meal or is hard as a rock to sleep on doesn't bother me in the least. All I care about is that I'm out there in the wilderness where I feel happy and not sitting in a cubicle for yet another wasted day.Feb 27, 2011 at 7:22 pm #1702449
Curtis B.BPL Member
@rutilateLocale: Pacific Northwest
I too am new to this scene, and perhaps the best advice I was given was to consider each trip a time to test. I take one old and new system with me each trip, trying out the new while carrying the backup just in case it all blows up.
This last trip was my first with the new Caldera TiTri Sidewinder. I took my XGK just in case it was too cold or it couldn't melt enough snow for water. Turns out the Caldera performed admirably in -10F and met all my needs. I fired up the XGK just for fun. Having passed the test, the XGK is going to stay home and I'll take my Caldera on any trip above 0F.
I also tried hiking in just Cap 3 in hopes of doing better temp management, and found that it was just too cold. I had my extra layers in the pack, so I was safe. Ordered some heavier weight First Ascent layers as soon as I got home.
In this way I have peace of mind knowing that I have my tried and tested just in case, so I won't have to abort my outing or risk my safety if I miscalculate.
I'm still working up to a tarp-don't know if I'm ever going to make it that far!Feb 27, 2011 at 8:33 pm #1702487
Eric BlumensaadtBPL Member
@danepackerLocale: Mojave Desert
I draw the line with certain gear. I'm a LIGHT backacker, not a ULer.
Below are my "lines".
TT MOMENT> I draw the line at tarps. too fiddly, often too flappy and by the time I get a bug net and ground cloth I'm back at a solo single wall tent weight.
REI UL 60 pack> I'll never will use a light full size pack W/O an internal frame – ever.
ANCIENT THERMAREST LITE REG.> Gotta have a good night's sleep
BRUNTON FLEX CANISTER STOVE> I can't abide alky stoves on week long trips or longer – too much fuel weight.
VARGO TRIAD BASE ESBIT STOVE> My lightest stove that I CAN abide.
Caldera Cone Sidewinder stove W/ Inferno conversion (TRUE efficiency.)
eVent PACKA rain parka/pack cover (Best solution to rain hiking yet.)Feb 28, 2011 at 11:44 am #1702676
Mary DBPL Member
@hikinggrannyLocale: Gateway to Columbia River Gorge
If it weren't for significant pack lightening, I would no longer be backpacking! Lightening up has enabled me to keep going into my 70's. However, there are some creature comforts (such as a 2.5" thick sleeping pad) that this old gal can't do without. My current base weight is 12 lbs., although this includes some items often eliminated from gear lists, such as camera and fishing gear. I guess that puts me on the verge of UL, but not quite there. It's close enough for me, though!
For quite a while, lightening up meant I could go out for the weekend with half the pack weight I used to carry in the 1980's. More recently, I've eliminated more gear weight so I can go out on longer trips (8-10 days) without resupply. I suspect, though that as the years go on, I'll be taking shorter and shorter trips. Not only am I not getting any younger, but per the vet my dog is now a "senior dog." A 15-lb. total pack weight for an overnighter, though, will let me keep going as long as I (and the dog) can put one foot in front of another, which is what I plan to do!
It's really an individual thing. For some, lightening up most of the pack allows a few luxuries to be carried, such as chairs, without significant burden. Or, as with me, being able to lengthen trips and still be comfortable. Or, carrying lots of heavy photo gear. For some, the accomplishment of surviving with a sub-5-pound pack is most important. We can all learn a lot from the UL, SUL and XSUL folks even if we don't imitate them completely.
All hail, the concepts of HYOH and YMMV!Feb 28, 2011 at 4:37 pm #1702789
Appreciate all the advice and experience. Think I just got a little caught up. Here's to 25 more nights! Cheers. When I think to the old Osprey Argon 85 crammed for a two night trip, it does seem I've come a long way. Here's to time and the benefits of experiences good and bad.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.