Topic

Filtering idea

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
PostedFeb 26, 2011 at 1:02 pm

I asked this in another thread, but I figured I would start the topic here to get some answers.
I've been trying recently to cut down weight on my water filtering methods. I originally used a Katadyn Hiker for awhile as my main filter. It weighed like 10ozs though, so I went with a Frontier Pro for awhile. Lightweight, yes, but super slow filter rate, just don't like it overall.

Ive been trying to think of a new way to filter water. I'm slightly basing my idea off this dudes video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is7X6JS9vUo
I wouldn't trust this 100% though, since those bags aren't scientifically rated at 1 micron, that just means that 90% of >1 micron stuff gets caught in it. So what I was thinking of doing is making one of these filters, with a coffee pre-filter (~20 micron, big enough to catch large cysts), and then chemically treat it with bleach afterwards. I've used bleach for a long time for water, usually after a filter. Only a few drops treats a liter.

My question to you is, would this work? I hike mainly in the rockies and cascades, so the water is pretty clean as is, and honestly, there are many times when I drink just from streams without even filtering. This would be a pretty lightweight approach, as the filters weigh almost nothing, and a small dirty container weighs like 2oz at most. I carry a microdropper of bleach with me anyways.

Thanks

Bob Gross BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2011 at 1:12 pm

John, you found that your Frontier Pro filter was super slow. How bad is it?

I wonder, because I use a Frontier Pro in a gravity-flow rig, and speed is not a problem at all. Mine will pass about one liter per minute.

There might be something going on that is not apparent to you. For example, air bubbles can be quite frustrating if you don't see them.

Mine suddenly slowed down one time, so I took it apart and found pine needles and crud in the pre-filter section. I cleaned that out and it worked perfectly again. I carry some replacements with me, but I don't think I will use them unless it appears to be really necessary.

Here is another odd way of thinking about a 1 micron filter. Suppose that 90% gets caught in it. That might be "thinning out" the giardia population to a somewhat safer level, even though it isn't perfect. By all accounts, there seems to be some number of cysts necessary to actually get giardiasis started, but that number is not firm. The filter just adds one level of help.

–B.G.–

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2011 at 1:16 pm

My experience with the Frontier Pro in gravity mode is 2.5 minutes per liter. I have come across a few complaints of "incessantly slow rate" — and I suspect there may be a quality issue. If you like everything else about the Frontier Pro, then I recommend you get a new one and give it another try.

Jerry Adams BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2011 at 1:21 pm

I think that's a bad idea

You don't want a MYOG filter

You want one that's been engineered and tested

Gravity filter – how high is inlet above outlet? If you have more drop, they'll more pressure so it'll be faster. A little more tubing doesn't weigh that much.

Bob Gross BPL Member
PostedFeb 26, 2011 at 1:31 pm

I use about two feet of tubing above the filter.

Yes, I am not too convinced about what I hear about the DIY filters.

–B.G.–

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Loading...