Actually, I think it's the Banana Boat "Baby Max Protect" that's in the hall of shame, but it may be the same thing. Apparently, a lot of high SPF sunscreens do a good job of protecting us from UVB, but a poor job with UVA. Until a few years ago, all UVA-effective creams could only be obtained abroad–they hadn't been approved here yet.
EVG suggests "In the meantime [until more effective screening compounds are approved], high-SPF products may tempt people to stay in the sun too long, suppressing sunburns but upping the risks of other kinds of skin damage. EWG recommends that consumers avoid products labeled with anything higher than “SPF 50+” and reapply sunscreen often, regardless of SPF."
Of course, if one knows this, not sure what the problem would be with using a high SPF product one likes and re-applying it often.
The EVG site is a wealth of information. Thanks, Jack. But not so sure I agree with their anti-oxybenzone, anti-vitamin A, etc. stance. They seem to favor creams with mineral oxides (Titanium, zinc, etc.) I guess I'd like to see more proof that the other common ingredients are actually bad.