About 4-5 years ago, i gave a premier UK dealer a call about purchasing some top notch European gear and sending it over here to the US. He wasn’t interested, but what was interesting was his take on US vs. European rated down. His attitude was a tad condescending towards all things American (or i should more correctly say all things USA.), so i took his comments with a grain of salt, but they certainly sounded reasonable to uninformed me. I’d love to hear what WM and Nunatak have to say in response to a summarization of his comments which i’ve detailed below.
Here is essentially what he related to me:
1. US & European down (including Montbell) use two different methods for measuring fillpower.
2. The US method changed some years ago. The result was that the exact same quality of down that rated at 750FP 10-15yrs ago is now, due to additional “fluffing” (his word) with hot air and pre-measurement tom-foolery is rated at 800-850FP.
3. Down which is rated at 750FP using the European method will be rated at 800-850FP using the US method. Conversely, down rated at 800-850FP via the US method will only rate at 750FP when subjected to the European method.
4. The additional loft provided by the US method is IMMEDIATELY lost when the down is placed into a piece of gear, returning the 800-850FP to at best 750FP.
5. He just laughed at claims of 900FP and said his previous comments applied equally to 900FP down, i.e. it would only be rated at 750FP if the European measurement were used.
6. He didn’t appreciate US Marketing hype and the seemingly unethical attempts to attract buyers with misleading claims. To this i would whole heartedly agree if his facts about down measurement/quality are correct.
So, IF this fella’s facts are correct, is MB using a better quality down? Or, are they changing how they rate the down? That is, are they using the US method? [Note: these questions are NOT a slam on MB. I own a lot of MB gear and clothing – love it all. Maybe not the lightest or warmest in its particular class, but extremely functional, WELL MADE, and perhaps a better VALUE (perhaps the BEST value???) than other top notch brands.]
Miguel (or others), is a similar change in FP indicated by MB in Japan? Let us know, kudasai.
How does the loft of the new MB 800FP garments/gear cp. to the previous year’s loft for the same garment/piece of gear filled with 725FP down? Do the measurements of loft bear out a change in FP? Are the same number of ounces of down used in the new year’s models vs. the prev. year’s models?
Sorry only have a lot of questions and no answers.
Does anyone out there have an authoritative response in agreement with the Brit’s comments to me or refuting his statements? If so, please reply. If you have references or links that substantiate your info, all the better.
[Sorry, my “old-timers” is acting up and while i remember the conversation very well, i can’t remember his name, his company, whether it was four or five years ago that we talked, nor can i even remember what piece of gear i called about initially (i think it was a line of bivies unavailable at that time in the US, but now available from BaseGear.com – not sure though), but, i do remember that, we soon got to talkin’ ’bout sleeping bags and down quality].