Topic

north face triumph anorak

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
jscott Blocked
PostedFeb 6, 2011 at 12:18 pm

Anybody have experience with this? Under six ounces, waterproof/breathable…like a windshirt on steroids? I'm especially curious about its wind-blocking properties.

PostedFeb 6, 2011 at 12:22 pm

I have one, and like it quite a bit. My mens medium weighs under 6 oz. Windshirt on steroids is accurate. The lack of venting options and lack of full coverage makes it mainly a pack queen; when I know I'll be hiking in anything more than light drizzle I take my Peak shell.

Art … BPL Member
PostedFeb 6, 2011 at 4:08 pm

my size XL weighs 183g (6.4oz).
I like it a lot for ultralight adventures.
To me its totally windproof.

not sure what is meant by "pack queen" and lack of coverage.
I prefer my shells a bit large, thus the size XL.
I could fit into a medium snugly and it probably wouldn't cover my butt.
But the XL has plenty of coverage and is still very light.

I did add an elastic drawstring to the waist which tacked on 3 grams.

PostedFeb 6, 2011 at 4:35 pm

"not sure what is meant by "pack queen" and lack of coverage".

What that means is that I usually only take the Triumph if I expect only periods of drizzle, because as breathable as it is I sweat heavily wearing while hiking because of limited venting options (no pit zips, 1/2 zip) Consequently, it usually stays in the pack.

In terms of lack of coverage, that should be self-expanitory. My medium barely covers the top of my waistline. You seem to have addressed this by sizing up.

If it's raining I want my rain jacket to have full features to keep me dry as possible.

To the OP, the Triumph is a nice anorak, but IMO better used as an "oh crap" option if you're surprised by a brief shower.

Art … BPL Member
PostedFeb 6, 2011 at 4:52 pm

the Triumph is a "minimalist" piece of raingear.
It should be analyzed and considered in that context.
No bells and whistles, very light weight.
size up one size and its great for fast, ultralight adventures.
I do own a North Face Diad, XL (9.5oz) for times I want more options.

jscott Blocked
PostedFeb 7, 2011 at 9:26 am

Thanks guys; this is about what I expected for this piece of gear. Seems like better wind protection than a Houdini.

James holden BPL Member
PostedFeb 7, 2011 at 9:34 am

absolute wind proof isnt always best for moisture management … a bit of wind flow can improve the "breathability" of garments

ive never used the triumph so i cant tell you how breathable it is … but generally most rain gear aint as breathable as a windshirt for higher output activities … some may have better ventilation though making up for it

consider that a full zip rain jacket doesnt weigh much more, and that its easier to put on and off and you can vent better

John Topping BPL Member
PostedFeb 7, 2011 at 10:03 am

Hi,
I have a Triumph and would agree with the other posts.

Fit is very slim/short and going up a size is a good tip (I didn't but wish I had after using it a fair bit).
Breathability is worse than Paclite
Waterproofing is on a par with Paclite (and much better IME than event…..)

Like Tim, I generally take this garment along when I don't expect to use it very much, e.g. week long summer trip in the Alps/Sierra where you would not expect a lot of rain but if the weather turns you are going to be in trouble with just a windshirt. The Triumph is good insurance and has kept me dry.

I wouldn't recommend the Triumph as a windshirt replacement (the Houdini is in a different league when it comes to breathability and useability albeit that it quite quickly reaches its limit in heavy rain).

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Loading...