Topic

FF down booties vs goosefeet down booties

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Mike M BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2010 at 7:48 pm

can't say which is better, but the FF come in a little cheaper as the shells are included in the price ($85), the FF also have more down 4 oz vs 1 oz (you can add up to an extra oz in the GF)

if you don't need that much down however, then the GF really shine as they are quite light ~ 3.9 oz vs 9 oz

so I guess it boils "down" :) to what your looking to use them for

Josh Newkirk BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2010 at 7:49 pm

I want to use them for winter camping in the pnw.
any idea whether I would need the extra down?

PostedDec 30, 2010 at 7:50 pm

Kind of a silly question, as, with all such questions, you'll generally get opinions on both sides. Not to mention that few people will have had both and so can make a direct comparison.

Both are very good. Both are well made. You won't go wrong with either.

Mike M BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2010 at 7:54 pm

for winter camping, depending on what temps your going to see, the FF might be the better option- a lot of folks like to err on the side of warm for cold weather

te – wa BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2010 at 10:01 pm

i for one dont get the point of stuffing 4 oz of down into the FF booties. my montbell alpine light has 4 oz of down, as does my te-wa Breeze underquilt.
that much down in small booties seems overkill, and diminishing.
stuffing down to the point where down compresses itself is pointless, imho.

get the goosefeet.

PostedDec 31, 2010 at 8:37 am

I have the FF booties, and really like them. The do have a lot of down in them (I would not say overkill) but they are for cold weather. If your going into warmer weather I think they might be to warm. I mostly went with FF because I liked the idea of having an inner and outer part of the boot. In the snow I can walk around camp in the booties and just slip the outer shell off while I climb into my bag at night. I was a little put off by the pic on the FF website (the inner bootie looked cheap to me) but upon receiving them I am very impressed with their quality and design.

Mike M BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2010 at 9:02 am

just to be clear, that would be 2 oz/bootie, not 4 oz for the FF :)

^ I think for winter (read cold) use the FF should work pretty well- sitting around camp from teens down to below 0 calls for pretty warm garments for the feet

I'd love to hear from GF users what their experience is for camp wear in cold weather- clearly for shoulder season/cool weather sleep/camp use the GF should be the cat's a$$

te – wa BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2010 at 9:09 am

thanks Mike, i knew i must have understood that wrong.. i have seen the FF in person. they look nice. i own GF inner and outer shells. they work fine around the house – i have not yet used the shell in the woods. Im sure it would hold up well, its made of dynemma iirc.
as if things arent confusing enough, i hear WM is going to introduce a newer, lighter version of their down socks this year.

t.darrah BPL Member
PostedDec 31, 2010 at 9:52 am

I have a pair of nunatak Teanaway down booties that I'm very pleased with.

4 oz total weight.
2 oz down fill weight.
Epic upper shell.
Toughtex outsole.

PostedDec 31, 2010 at 10:02 am

For Christmas I got a pair of the 40 Below Booties and I got my kid a set of the GF Socks with the Overboots. They are very cool. We just finished shoveling the driveway with the booties on. I was toasty warm and so was the kid (no wool socks needed). We had good traction and it is darn cold out there today with some decent wind chill.

I'll end up getting a pair of the GF for myself before too long, but I like the idea of synthetic insulation for moisture management.

Mike

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Loading...