Certainly you can avoid condensation in lightweight tents.
I can only surmise that many on this site are so wedded to bomber tents, if not single wall tents, that they must have total coverage with little ventilation, and are resigned to condensation.
This is what I saw with the criticisms of TarpTent's first version of the Scarp.
This is what I see when looking at the superlight, supertight Terra Nova tents, for example.
This is what I see from the manufacturers who provide coverage for tempests, but use designs and/or materials that cannot possibly withstand a tempest.
If you build a sauna enclosure, then you get a sauna bath.
You can be quite comfortable in most conditions without total enclosure. Not all of us are going to be Oli crossing Greenland. I am quite happy getting in my car and driving to the CDT, thank you. Plenty challenging, and it costs a whole lot less. Thank you, Motel 6.
AT/Adirondack shelters have been keeping us dry for over a century with one side completely open to the elements. And they are not all in the woods. Many are in high, exposed locations. NH's Cohos Trail Baldhead shelter, for example.
Indeed, many on this site frequently use tarps that do not provide total protection.
And with the coming of new technologies for treating fabrics, it will become even easier to design condensation free shelters.
There is simply no reason to carry a heavier, bombproof shelter year round and in all places, when with a little knowledge and experience, in most times and places one can readily plan for camping below timber/tree line or in protected areas in the event of foul weather.
Those who disagree may be pleased to know that this will be my last comment on the subject. If you want to suffer, go ahead. I will be enjoying both carrying a lighter shelter, and not having wetness rubbing up against and dripping all over me, my tentmates and my gear. Glub.