Topic
950+ Down @ Nunatak announcement
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › 950+ Down @ Nunatak announcement
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:28 pm #1266125
From Nunatak's website:
"Good news for those seeking the best possible down gear from us here at Nunatak.
We are pleased to announce a limited edition of 950+ white goose down for our gear this season. While our stock fill of 875+ is superior in every way, this is an extra high end boost for no additional weight. Now our jackets are warmer and more compressible than ever!
Cost is nominal, add $8.00 for every ounce of down being replaced in a down jacket or quilt. Overfill is 20$ per ounce. This means our Skaha down sweater, size xl with 5 ounces of fill, will cost an extra 40.00."
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:29 pm #1669818Is 950+ even feasible? Possible? I don't even think it exists.
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:39 pm #1669823i've always heard it was marketing department fiction, but who knows – anything is possible except dinosaurs.
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:45 pm #1669825"anything is possible except dinosaurs"
Well, the BPL PM and forum systems flat out proves that wrong…..
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:48 pm #1669826"anything is possible except dinosaurs."
Wait, are you telling me Jurassic Park is fake!! :-)
Dec 1, 2010 at 12:56 pm #1669827No, I think what he is saying is that many Dinosaurs had feathers.
Dec 1, 2010 at 1:07 pm #1669832It does not seem so unfeasible to me and I commend Nunatak for raising the bar. They don't seem to me to be a company that would make the statement frivolously.
It could simply be a matter of cherry-picking the best batches of the best 875+ fill by meticulously testing and sorting. Remember, the 875+ is a minimum average fill power. Or perhaps, genetically modified geese (God forbid), or some other special breed, like Valandre claims.
Dec 1, 2010 at 2:44 pm #1669877Quick…. grab my graduated cylinder!!!
Dec 1, 2010 at 3:40 pm #1669902You just feed the geese a special diet. Three espressos a day should do it.
Dec 1, 2010 at 3:45 pm #1669905Man we really get carried away with STUFF myself included;) and i try so hard to not like stuff lol!!
Dec 1, 2010 at 4:52 pm #1669939"You just feed the geese a special diet. Three espressos a day should do it."
Or a feed tham a load of BS, apparently.
Dec 1, 2010 at 4:57 pm #1669947Luxurylite says its possible. Though this article talks about the detriments of using down fill of this quality, it still seems to indicate that this fill quality does in fact exist.
http://www.luxurylite.com/fillweight.html900 seemed impossible until we started seeing it in gear.
e.g. Patagonia special edition sweater, Eddie Bauer Special edition downlite, The down sold by thru-hiker, quilts and down gear made by BPL members, etcDavid, why so hostile? any particular reason why it can't exist?
Dec 1, 2010 at 5:12 pm #1669951Hostile? Really? I simply choose not to believe the marketing spin.
Would you rather follow blindly or question the seemingly impossible?
What I want is the test results posted so I can then believe it.
Dec 1, 2010 at 5:23 pm #1669954"Or a feed tham a load of BS, apparently."
my bad! Choice of words threw me off
I def question as well, but with a seemingly more open/optimistic mindset…maybe i'm just gullible :/
Dec 1, 2010 at 5:26 pm #1669956Yes – I was just joking with the comment.
(trust me – I want it to be true. Fewer feathers is goooood).
Dec 1, 2010 at 5:27 pm #1669957agreed–coupled with this new lightweight momentum that Ron is pimping, we are talking revolution-potential here
Yes…sadly I do measure innovation by grams :D
Dec 1, 2010 at 7:39 pm #1669992Ryan Jordan
( ryan – BPL STAFF – M)Locale:
Greater YellowstoneNEW Re: Re: Re: Introduction to Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008 on 08/10/2008 08:04:56 MDT
Bill et al.,
I spoke at length with IDFL yesterday about down testing.
None of their tests stimulate real world testing. 900 fp in a test is going to be a pipe dream in the field, because they steam wash and dry the down to nearly zero humidity before doing the test. Ironically, this most recent iteration of test methods was designed to determine the maximum possible fill power for down rather than what it will look like in the field.
Interestingly as a side note, we did some 900 fp testing of down a few years ago on two manufacturer's 900 bags. We cut the bags open and sent them to IDFL. Neither made the claimed 900 spec (they tested 830-870 using the steam method). What was more dramatic was that when each down (which clearly came from different sources as evidenced by visual inspection) was subjected to 50% humidity, the differences were pretty dramatic. One bag tested at 770 fp, the other at 680 fp. It seems that at least these two sources of 900 down had feathers in it that were not resilient in response to humidity.
The kicker is that we ran the same test next to down taken from a manufacturer's 750 fp bag. at 50% humidity, the fp was 720. Why? It had more feathers that were stiff enough to preserve the loft in moist conditions.
Dec 1, 2010 at 7:48 pm #1669996dont say that H word on BPL …. its a fictional word invented by all those primaloft bums ;)
950 down? … isnt there a standard euro test for down? … EN 12934 or some other rule ….
darn euros … cant they just get with the marketing
Dec 2, 2010 at 7:31 am #1670092Thanks Richard. This confirms my thoughts. although I wasn't aware of the practicality of such a high rated down even if it did exist.
Dec 2, 2010 at 11:05 am #1670157Thanks Richard, Those findings are in line with the luxurylite article as well. Funny how there was recent discussion about how most gear today has >10% feather fill…didn't realize that this may actually be of benefit.
Dec 2, 2010 at 12:49 pm #1670177This is going OT a bit… But I can't help wondering if a superior insulation might be made by combining down and some sort of artificial feather? Some sort of plastic device which retains shape more durably than a feather.
Bring on the 1500 fill down!
Dec 2, 2010 at 2:37 pm #1670207Sure, humidity has a tremendous affect on down. Case in point:
If I stick my pair of Goose-feet down socks in the dryer, on 120 degree F heat (+/-) for about 10 minutes, they come out looking like they are so stuffed full of down that they could not possibly hold any more. They appear to have nearly doubled their loft and look more like balloons. Weighing them also shows that they are approximately 7% lighter than at ambient temperature/humidity levels (I do live in the PNW).
The idea that in real world circumstances, higher fill power does not directly equate to better performance is an interesting topic that has come up more than once recently here now. I also find it worth noting that the weight increase of the down due to ambient air humidity changes is indeed measurable and significant.
Dec 3, 2010 at 9:09 am #1670448I consider that great news. The gear companies get to sell a premium product to those who just have to have the "best" and I'll buy the "old" technology at half price.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
UPDATED August 2024: See our recommendations for lightweight gear at REI »
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.