Topic

Vasque Blur, Velocity and Celerator

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Ethan A. BPL Member
PostedMar 3, 2010 at 1:31 pm

Anyone have any experience with them?

Are they true to size? In other words, if you have a size 11 foot, and typically wear an 11.5 in running and hiking shoes, would you also take an 11.5 in these shoes?

Do they have a wide forefoot/generous toe box?

Good cushioning?

I only have experience with Vasque's light boots, and the experience was very good.

PostedMar 3, 2010 at 1:45 pm

I have these and they fit me well. They are true to there size and have a fairly wide toe area which I need.They breathe so well, also.

Ethan A. BPL Member
PostedMar 3, 2010 at 1:49 pm

Thanks Josh – how's the cushioning throughout, especially the forefoot?

PostedMar 3, 2010 at 6:15 pm

I have a pair of Velocity VST's I bought in a local gear shop last summer. They felt great at the time but I didn't really wear them. I was trying to finish killing off a pair of older GoLites. I took them out last weekend and am pretty dissatisfied. While the width and cushioning seem ok, my toes were sliding into the toebox and I was left with some pretty sore piggies at the end of the weekend. I had never experienced that before and was a little disgruntled.

Take it FWIW.

Ethan A. BPL Member
PostedMar 3, 2010 at 6:23 pm

Isn't it interesting that some of the products that are most heavily marketed in a given category turn out to be the most disappointing? I remember seeing that shoe all over the place.

Thanks guys for the feedback, very helpful.

Fred Eoff BPL Member
PostedMar 4, 2010 at 5:07 am

I have been using the Blurs since early last season. I have a wide forefoot and always a problem finding a good fit. The Blurs are probably the most comfortable in that regard of any shoe I have worn.

Francis DeRoos BPL Member
PostedMar 4, 2010 at 9:17 am

I've recently gone through trying all sorts for trail runners as I'm transiting from a heavy boot to lightweight backpacking. I chose the Vasque blur because it has a much firmer shaped heel than most other trail runners and this is a feature I've found myself continually choosing in my running shoes as well as my biking shoes. I also like the slightly wider and less pointed toe box to allow some movement and flexibility but not have my toes feel like they're being funneled forward into a point after lots of hiking (if that makes sense). I typically wear an 11 in most shoes but found 11.5 more comfortable because of the slightly firmer heal shape.

PostedMar 4, 2010 at 9:41 am

I used Velocity's on my 2007 AT thru-hike, and I found them to be extremely comfortable and well-fitting. I got over 1000 miles out of my first pair, too, which I think speaks well to their durability.

I've stopped using them since discovering other trail runners with wider toe-boxes. I lost both of my little toenails because of the relatively narrow toe box of my Velocity's. I haven't tried the newer wide sizes for the Vasques, but I'm hesitant to try since I'm perfectly happy with the fit of my New Balance sneakers– that's not to say NB is better, they're just a better fit for MY feet.

PostedMar 4, 2010 at 10:34 am

Wear a size 12, hiked through 6" of slush for 2 days in them and have worn them to work for the past 3 weeks. Seem pretty comfortable but they are my first pair of trail runners. Good deal for 55 bucks.

I wear a 12 in everything, my Garmont Eclipses seem large when I start a hike and I have to tighten them a lot. My Vasque Clarions always fit pretty well. My adidas skate shoes with rubber toes are super tight.

These fit well with big socks, with ultralight socks they are a little roomy in the office.

PostedApr 3, 2013 at 7:52 am

Been using theese shoes for over 10 years. Nice and stiff and fit me well. I find them true to size.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Loading...