i used 56#'s of supplies on a 35 day trek. it took 21 days i recall to make the first 120 miles. after that things opened up (no more swamp) and it was fun.
i should have ate the whole 62# i had, but i scimped too much in the opening sections. (was scared)
the problem is.. is that you lose too much mass doing long stints like that. the next bit was only 3 weeks or so, and i devoured pretty much the entire 62 pounds.
sometimes it's better to carry more grub so as to maintain body mass deeper into the trek.
you can see walter has grey hair. when it comes to toting stouter stuff ..
grey hair helps.
—
then comes something form a few years ago. this is insider stuff:
peter was sitting there in his apt with a large green terraplane, a large green mchale, and a large green aarn load beast with front pockets. i;ll type this out, but i got things to do tonight.
the dana worked ok up to maybe 55#, then the belt caves, it just does, maybe 60, at it's best. that's just the way it works on my body, using the 22° women"s belt helps a bit. adds 5#. .. whoopee. still, you can sub one for free, and it carries better. i did the cdt with a dana. it gave me pack sores too.
the aarn did in fact carry the full test load (90#) at the lowest heartrate. yes, the tilt factor matters. BUT, it's got so many straps and widgets and dwinky BS thingles on it, that every time you put it on, you need to pre-flight the dam thing. so ya, it works, but one needs to be very careful WHICH of the several arm holes you shoot the left arm thru or you will be in a big twitter, and probably tear the pack. so, huge dittos for making a viable advancement in carrying, but .. not ready for prime time. aarn really has the belt theory situation in hand. it was built rather crappy, but it did not strip down over my pelvis.
90 pounds gentlemen, is Heavy. it's heavy enough to be quasi dangerous if it gets loose back there during a mounting. it is sufficiently massive to SLAM your face into the rocks if you fall. arms alone will not stop it. it needs to be controlled. you do not want a big load to have a vote in the direction you are going. if you throw it up wrong, it can destroy a mature shoulder.
the mchale (i own two) did fine. the first one from the 90's was not spectacular, but it was durable. the second one circa 2005 is just phenominal in all ways. 21 oz lighter, carries well at all weights, lasts and lasts, never breaks, etc. i love it. and i trust it.
at test weight there was no localized discomfort. it all pushes down equally hard.
so, even though the aarn carries more efficiently, i would be a fool to trust my all to anything but my mchale.
is a mchale a free pass to toting big loads. no. you have to be in shape. and you have to be emotionally ready for it. and you have to WANT to do it. the mchale is a tool, which if used properly, will get the job done.