Interesting to see Dan's comments here, as I'm a long time loyal Helly Hansen wearer. I still have a couple of second-generation lifa shirts from the early 90s, and still wear them for some things, e.g. winter bike commuting. They are much more comfortable and less smelly than the 1970s first generation ones I had before (although that's admittedly a pretty low hurdle)
I had been watching the whole merino thing from the sidelines because I'm very sensitive to wool – had tried Icebreakers and a couple of other reputable brands on in shops, and almost broke out in a rash right there in the changing room. Then I found that I can wear Patagonia's "Wool 1" merino/polyester mix with no problems at all. Have been wearing one for all outings for the last few weeks – without washing, as an experiment. I'm so pleased with it, I just bought another one, because Patagonia have a history of quickly making their best kit unavailable in Europe.
Which means, I guess, that I'm not currently in the market for any more baselayers. Although from what I've read I don't realistically expect my new merino shirts to last decades like the old H-H polypros do. So I had noted with interest that both H-H and Montane make also merino-mix garments, but with different approaches.
The Patagonia mix, I read somewhere, is fibres spun with a polyester core and wool outside; Helly Hansen's layers are then something quite different (and if the polypro is on the inside, that would take away some of my concern about wool itch); Montane apparently has the merino on the inside and polyester on the outside. Interesting.
(Yes, I'm aware that none of these is a patch system as suggested by the original poster)