I'm just back from hiking the Cranberry Loop 50 in the Adirondack Forest Preserve. My total stove and fuel load was 5 oz. at the start of the five day hike and 4 oz. at the end. We cooked on my Lunar Titan Woodsman wood stove.
see http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=18056
for a description and photos of the stove.
The ounce difference between start and finish is due to the consumption of a few drops of charcoal lighter per light-off. Charcoal lighter is my tinder of choice because it has a high energy content and doesn't stink if you get it on ya.
I've been cooking with wood for two years now, and about 8 months with the Woodsman. I'm ready to make some pronouncements on the philosophy of cooking with wood.
First, the contrast between conventional wood stove wisdom I've gleened and my own.
CW: dirty ME: so what?
CW: smelly ME: deal!
CW: can't cook with wet wood ME: can too!
CW: lower fuel load ME: darn toot'n
CW: can't use it everywhere ME: sad but true
CW: cooking with wood is a labor intensive pain in the butt. ME: a royal pain in the butt!
CW: Your fully enclosed design may be safer,
but I don't want to lift a pot to feed the fire. ME: What? Your arm's broken?
CW: Not that much of a weight saving. ME: you don't cook muffins or Viggo Red Beans and rice.
People don't seem to think about that last one very often. I think many people consciously or subconsciously alter their trail diet to conserve fuel which is something you never have to do with a wood stove. That said, I hate wood and I'm switching to gas for short hikes. It requires too much labor and too much attention. I want to come into camp and be cooking in less than 30 seconds.


