Aug 21, 2009 at 9:26 pm #1238735
I'm looking at the Marmot Kompressor, Mountain Hardwear scrambler (old model), North Face Flyweight
these are roughly the same weight ~ 10 oz, the scrambler offers the largest volume ~ 1600, the Kompressor the least ~ 900
others I should be looking at? opinions on any of the above?
the pack will serve as a stuff sack as well
thanks in advance
MikeAug 21, 2009 at 9:39 pm #1522397
Golite Ion which is approx. 10oz.
If you are looking for a dry sack, compression sack, stuff sack, what about the Outdoor Research Dry Peak Bagger at 9.2 oz:Aug 22, 2009 at 8:19 am #1522464
that looks like a nice option- wouldn't have to worry about your sleeping bag getting wet using that as the stuff sack
also found this- oware "daypack/stuff sack"
1050 cu in, 2.9 oz- pretty light :)Aug 22, 2009 at 7:35 pm #1522541
A REI flash 18 would work.
I have seen some that are trimmed down to 7-8 ounces.
I have last years model which only has one daisy chain down the middle and it weighs a couple ounces less. There must be other changes to account for the weight difference.Aug 23, 2009 at 7:06 pm #1522675
Joe GeibBPL Member
@joegeibLocale: Delaware & Lehigh Valleys
I also prefer the cousin to the REI Flash; the REI Zip Travel pack.
It has bottle pockets, a lid, and packs down (not at its own stuff sack, though).Aug 24, 2009 at 5:44 pm #1522802
Hikin’ JimBPL Member
@hikin_jimLocale: Orange County, CA, USA
I've got one of these, and I really like it: Patagonia Travel Pack. Expensive, but I waited for a sale. Folds up small and doubles as a compression sack. It's 15 oz according to the website, but it holds pretty much everything I need for a peak bag in good weather.
Their website lists it at 1647 cu in. Dunno, but that seems a bit bigger than what I've got, but mine is an older model ('07).Aug 24, 2009 at 7:20 pm #1522818
both the REI packs look very viable options, the Patagonia looks nice as well (a little heavier than some of the others posted though)
I found this one- pretty spartan (well quite spartan actually :)), but very, very light @ 4.5 ozAug 24, 2009 at 8:05 pm #1522824
@rayestrellaLocale: Northern Minnesota
I literally just sold and mailed off my MH Scrambler today. I kept my REI Flash. It is a pretty nice summit pack for the price and if you are an organization nut you will like all the pockets.Aug 24, 2009 at 10:08 pm #1522848
Fred ericBPL Member
@fre49Locale: France, vallée de la Loire
31g and plenty of room for 2.
we used it in Greenland and for a little weight penalty over my usual sleeping bag pack : +20G we could use this pack for short trip fishing etc.
the pack is much longer than wide but it was on purpose so it would be stable using only one shoulder strap diagonally, i needed the pack lenght to be close to my back lenght in diagonal so it would stay in place.
took less than an hour to sew.Aug 24, 2009 at 10:36 pm #1522850
@cooldripLocale: "Grand Canyon of the East"
If you can wait until December, A ZPacks Zilch or Zero would be perfect. Integral Designs makes one as well.Aug 25, 2009 at 10:40 am #1522893
Fred- very innovative!
I seem to be quite torn between the spartan (Integral Designs, Oware, Zpacks) or the more fully featured packs REI, Marmot, MH, etc
well nothing new there :)
the input is very much appreciatedAug 25, 2009 at 10:55 am #1522896
jim drauckerBPL Member
@mtnjimLocale: Shenandoah Valley VA
If you have any specific questions. Between my son and I
we own the Scrambler, Zilch , Oware and NF Fly weight.
JimAug 25, 2009 at 10:57 am #1522898
I recently got the newer REI Flash 18 and I like it a lot. It is very light and has nice features. I threaded shock cord through the front loops for a quick place to stash sandals or what not. It's a pretty inexpensive product as well.Aug 25, 2009 at 5:12 pm #1522947
looks like the REI is getting high marks
Jim- well that's handy :)
I know the light ones are light, but how do they do as a summit pack vs the other higher optioned ones?
do you have a favorite? any of those that you would recommend not getting?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.